Practical aspects concerning validation and quality control for forensic and clinical bioanalytical quantitative methods

被引:93
作者
Wille, Sarah M. R. [1 ]
Peters, Frank T. [2 ]
Di Fazio, Vincent [1 ]
Samyn, Nele [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Criminalist & Criminol, Fed Publ Serv Justice, B-1120 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Jena, Inst Forens Med, D-07743 Jena, Germany
关键词
Experimental set-up; Acceptance criteria; Validation; Quality control; Bioanalytical toxicology; MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY; RECENT ISSUES; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00769-011-0775-0
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Reporting reliable analytical data is the backbone of forensic and clinical bioanalytical research and applications. Therefore, international agreement concerning validation and quality control requirements is needed. Several international guidelines provide a standard for fundamental validation parameters such as selectivity, matrix effects, method limits, calibration, accuracy, precision and stability. However, it is not always easy for the analyst to 'translate' these guidelines into practice. International guidelines remain nonbinding protocols that need to be updated according to the type of application and the analyst's method requirements and depends on the evolution of analytical techniques. In this publication, suggestions for experimental set-up, statistical approaches and straightforward acceptance criteria for validation of forensic bioanalytical applications are suggested. Furthermore, permanent quality control, to ensure state-of-the-art quantitative analytical performances, as well as measurement uncertainty influencing interpretation is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 292
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Linear regression for calibration lines revisited: weighting schemes for bioanalytical methods [J].
Almeida, AM ;
Castel-Branco, MM ;
Falcao, AC .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2002, 774 (02) :215-222
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Guidance for industry, bioanalytical method validation
[3]  
[Anonymous], E HDB STAT METH
[4]   Key aspects of analytical method validation and linearity evaluation [J].
Araujo, Pedro .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2009, 877 (23) :2224-2234
[5]   The evaluation of measurement uncertainty from method validation studies - Part 2: The practical application of a laboratory protocol [J].
Barwick, VJ ;
Ellison, SLR ;
Rafferty, MJQ ;
Gill, RS .
ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2000, 5 (03) :104-113
[6]   The evaluation of measurement uncertainty from method validation studies - Part 1: Description of a laboratory protocol [J].
Barwick, VJ ;
Ellison, SLR .
ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2000, 5 (02) :47-53
[7]  
Bonfiglio R, 1999, RAPID COMMUN MASS SP, V13, P1175, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(19990630)13:12<1175::AID-RCM639>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-0
[9]   Validation issues arising from the new FDA guidance for industry on bioanalytical method validation [J].
Brodie, RR ;
Hill, HM .
CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 2002, 55 (Suppl 1) :S91-S94
[10]  
[CHMP (CHMP) C. f. m. p. f. h. u.], 2009, GUID VAL BIOAN METH