Male mate preference for female eyespan and fecundity in the stalk-eyed fly, Teleopsis dalmanni

被引:29
作者
Cotton, Alison J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cotton, Samuel [1 ]
Small, Jennifer [1 ]
Pomiankowski, Andrew [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Genet Evolut & Environm, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] UCL, CoMPLEX, London WC1E 6BT, England
[3] Bristol Zoo Gardens, Bristol Zool Soc, Bristol BS8 3HA, Avon, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 英国自然环境研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
fecundity; female ornament; male mate preference; mate choice; sexual selection; stalk-eyed fly; SEXUAL ORNAMENT SIZE; COURTSHIP-ROLE REVERSAL; CYRTODIOPSIS-DALMANNI; ARTIFICIAL SELECTION; DIASEMOPSIS-MEIGENII; CONDITION DEPENDENCE; MATING FREQUENCY; FLIES DIOPSIDAE; GENETIC MODELS; MALE CHOICE;
D O I
10.1093/beheco/aru192
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Traditional views of sexual selection view males as the indiscriminate sex, competing for access to choosy females. It is increasingly recognized that mating can also be costly for males and they are therefore likely to exhibit choice in order to maximize their reproductive success. Stalk-eyed flies are model species in sexual selection studies. Males are sperm limited and constrained in the number of matings they are able to partake in. In addition, variation in female fecundity has been shown to correlate positively with female eyespan, so eyespan size could provide males with a reliable signal of female reproductive value. We examined male mate preference in the wild in the stalk-eyed fly, Teleopsis dalmanni. In addition, we set up experiments in the laboratory allowing males a choice between females that varied in 1) eyespan (a proxy for fecundity) and/or 2) fecundity (manipulated through diet). We found that males exhibited preference for large eyespan females, both in the wild and laboratory studies. As well as using female eyespan as a mating cue, males were also able to assess female fecundity directly. Changes in fecundity among large eyespan females caused corresponding changes in male mate preference, whereas changes in the fecundity of small eyespan females had limited effect on their attractiveness. These results show that male mate preferences are a prevalent feature of a canonical example of female mate choice sexual selection and that males use multiple cues when they assess females as potential mates.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 385
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Do the eyestalks of female diopsid flies have a function in intrasexual aggressive encounters?
    Al-khairulla, H
    Warburton, D
    Knell, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSECT BEHAVIOR, 2003, 16 (05) : 679 - 686
  • [2] Why are female birds ornamented?
    Amundsen, T
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2000, 15 (04) : 149 - 155
  • [3] Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish
    Amundsen, T
    Forsgren, E
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (23) : 13155 - 13160
  • [4] Risky mate search and male self-sacrifice in redback spiders
    Andrade, MCB
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2003, 14 (04) : 531 - 538
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2003, Animal Signals
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1972, SEXUAL SELECTION DES, DOI [10.4324/9781315129266-7, DOI 10.4324/9781315129266-7, DOI 10.1002/AJPA.1330400226]
  • [7] Baker RH, 2001, EVOLUTION, V55, P1373
  • [8] Accessory gland size influences time to sexual maturity and mating frequency in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni
    Baker, RH
    Denniff, M
    Futerman, P
    Fowler, K
    Pomiankowski, A
    Chapman, T
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2003, 14 (05) : 607 - 611
  • [9] Effects of multiple mating and male eye span on female reproductive output in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni
    Baker, RH
    Ashwell, RIS
    Richards, TA
    Fowler, K
    Chapman, T
    Pomiankowski, A
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2001, 12 (06) : 732 - 739
  • [10] Female nuptial coloration and its adaptive significance in a mutual mate choice system
    Baldauf, Sebastian A.
    Bakker, Theo C. M.
    Kullmann, Harald
    Thuenken, Timo
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 22 (03) : 478 - 485