Relation of Operator Volume and Access Site to Short-Term Mortality in Radial Versus Femoral Access for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:0
作者
Hannan, Edward L. [1 ]
Zhong, Ye [1 ]
Ling, Frederick S. K. [2 ]
LeMay, Michel [3 ]
Jacobs, Alice K. [4 ]
King, Spencer B., III [5 ]
Berger, Peter B.
Venditti, Ferdinand J. [6 ]
Walford, Gary [7 ]
Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline [8 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Albany, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[3] Univ Ottawa, Heart Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Boston Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[5] Emory Hlth Syst, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Albany Med Ctr, Albany, NY USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Med Ctr, XXX, New York, NY USA
[8] Mt Sinai St Lukes Hosp, New York, NY USA
关键词
ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ARTERY ACCESS; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; ANGIOGRAPHY; OUTCOMES; PREDICT; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.04.025
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The relation between operator volume and mortality of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) procedures for ST-elevation myocardial infarction has not been studied comprehensively. This study included patients who underwent PPCI between 2010 and 2017 in all nonfederal hospitals approved to perform PCI in New York State. We compared risk-adjusted in-hospital/30-day mortality for radial access (RA) and femoral access (FA) and the relation between risk-adjusted mortality and procedure volume for each access site. In 44,540 patients in the study period, the use of RA rose from 8% in 2,010% to 43% in 2017 (p <0.0001). There was no significant change in PPCI risk-adjusted mortality during the period (p=0.27 for trend). RA was associated with lower mortality when imposing operator exclusion criteria used in recent trials. There was a significant operator inverse volume-mortality relation for FA procedures but not for RA procedures. FA procedures performed by lower volume FA operators (lowest quartile) were associated with higher risk-adjusted mortality compared with RA procedures (3.71% vs 3.06%, p = 0.01) or compared with FA procedures performed by higher volume FA operators (3.71% vs 3.16% , p = 0.01). In conclusion, in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction referred for primary PCI in New York State, there was a significant uptake in the use of RA along with relatively constant in-hospital/30-day mortality. There was a significant inverse operator volume-mortality relation for FA procedures accompanied by higher mortality for FA procedures performed by low volume FA operators than for all other primary PCI procedures. In conclusion, this information underscores the need for operators to remain vigilant in maintaining FA skills and monitoring FA outcomes. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 36
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Improved in-hospital outcome for radial access in a large contemporary cohort of primary percutaneous coronary intervention
    Hasun, Matthias
    Doerler, Jakob
    Alber, Hannes F.
    Bauer, Axel
    Berger, Rudolf
    Christ, Guenter
    Frick, Matthias
    Hoppe, Uta C.
    Huber, Kurt
    Lamm, Gudrun
    Lassnig, Elisabeth
    von Lewinski, Dirk
    Rab, Anna
    Roithinger, Franz X.
    Schuchlenz, Herwig
    Siostrzonek, Peter
    Sipoetz, Johann
    Stefenelli, Thomas
    Steinwender, Clemens
    Edlinger, Michael
    Weidinger, Franz
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2021, 11 (03) : 726 - 735
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness of Radial Access Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome
    Lee, Peter
    Liew, Danny
    Brennan, Angela
    Stub, Dion
    Lefkovits, Jeffrey
    Reid, Christopher M.
    Zomer, Ella
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 156 : 44 - 51
  • [23] Is It Time to Join the Cult? Radial Access and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Kleiman, Neal S.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (06)
  • [24] A Call to Arms: Radial Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Savage, Michael P.
    Fischman, David L.
    Ruggiero, Nicholas J.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 163 (12) : 956 - +
  • [25] Radial Access for Rescue Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Underutilized and Underappreciated
    Mahmud, Ehtisham
    Patel, Mitul
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (14) : 1877 - 1879
  • [26] Clinical outcomes following radial versus femoral artery access in primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention in Scotland: retrospective cohort study of 4534 patients
    Johnman, Cathy
    Pell, Jill P.
    Mackay, Daniel F.
    Behan, Miles
    Slack, Rachel
    Oldroyd, Keith G.
    Berry, Colin
    HEART, 2012, 98 (07) : 552 - 557
  • [27] Predictive Factors for Access-Site Pain Chronicity after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Radial Artery Access
    Brogiene, Liuda
    Baksyte, Giedre
    Klimaite, Agne
    Paliokas, Martynas
    Macas, Andrius
    PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 2020
  • [28] Radial Access Use for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Dialysis Patients
    Sutton, Nadia R.
    Seth, Milan
    Lingam, Natesh
    Gurm, Hitinder S.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (01)
  • [29] Predictors of Radial to Femoral Artery Access Crossover During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Dang, Denee
    Kuhn, Lisa
    Fooladi, Ensieh
    Ky, Vivian
    Cheung, Kevin
    Rashid, Hashrul
    Zaman, Sarah
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2022, 31 (07) : 985 - 992
  • [30] Comparison of quality-of-life measures after radial versus femoral artery access for cardiac catheterization in women: Results of the Study of Access Site for Enhancement of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Women quality-of-life substudy
    Hess, Connie N.
    Krucoff, Mitchell W.
    Sheng, Shubin
    Anstrom, Kevin J.
    Barham, W. Britt
    Gilchrist, Ian C.
    Harrington, Robert A.
    Jacobs, Alice K.
    Mehran, Roxana
    Messenger, John C.
    Mark, Daniel B.
    Rao, Sunil V.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 170 (02) : 371 - 379