Relation of Operator Volume and Access Site to Short-Term Mortality in Radial Versus Femoral Access for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:0
作者
Hannan, Edward L. [1 ]
Zhong, Ye [1 ]
Ling, Frederick S. K. [2 ]
LeMay, Michel [3 ]
Jacobs, Alice K. [4 ]
King, Spencer B., III [5 ]
Berger, Peter B.
Venditti, Ferdinand J. [6 ]
Walford, Gary [7 ]
Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline [8 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Albany, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[3] Univ Ottawa, Heart Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Boston Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[5] Emory Hlth Syst, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Albany Med Ctr, Albany, NY USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Med Ctr, XXX, New York, NY USA
[8] Mt Sinai St Lukes Hosp, New York, NY USA
关键词
ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ARTERY ACCESS; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; ANGIOGRAPHY; OUTCOMES; PREDICT; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.04.025
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The relation between operator volume and mortality of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) procedures for ST-elevation myocardial infarction has not been studied comprehensively. This study included patients who underwent PPCI between 2010 and 2017 in all nonfederal hospitals approved to perform PCI in New York State. We compared risk-adjusted in-hospital/30-day mortality for radial access (RA) and femoral access (FA) and the relation between risk-adjusted mortality and procedure volume for each access site. In 44,540 patients in the study period, the use of RA rose from 8% in 2,010% to 43% in 2017 (p <0.0001). There was no significant change in PPCI risk-adjusted mortality during the period (p=0.27 for trend). RA was associated with lower mortality when imposing operator exclusion criteria used in recent trials. There was a significant operator inverse volume-mortality relation for FA procedures but not for RA procedures. FA procedures performed by lower volume FA operators (lowest quartile) were associated with higher risk-adjusted mortality compared with RA procedures (3.71% vs 3.06%, p = 0.01) or compared with FA procedures performed by higher volume FA operators (3.71% vs 3.16% , p = 0.01). In conclusion, in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction referred for primary PCI in New York State, there was a significant uptake in the use of RA along with relatively constant in-hospital/30-day mortality. There was a significant inverse operator volume-mortality relation for FA procedures accompanied by higher mortality for FA procedures performed by low volume FA operators than for all other primary PCI procedures. In conclusion, this information underscores the need for operators to remain vigilant in maintaining FA skills and monitoring FA outcomes. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 36
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radial or femoral access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): Does the choice matters?
    Batra, Mahesh Kumar
    Rai, Lajpat
    Khan, Naveed Ullah
    Mengal, Muhammad Naeem
    Khowaja, Sanam
    Rizvi, Syed Nadeem Hassan
    Saghir, Tahir
    Qamar, Nadeem
    Sial, Jawaid Akbar
    Karim, Musa
    INDIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 72 (03) : 166 - 171
  • [2] Comparison of radial access versus femoral access with the use of a vascular closure device for the prevention of vascular complications and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention
    Teblick, Arno
    Vanderbruggen, Wies
    Vandendriessche, Tom
    Bosmans, Johan
    Haine, Steven Els Frans
    Miljoen, Hielko
    Segers, Vincent
    Wouters, Kristien
    Vrints, Christiaan
    Claeys, Marc J.
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2018, 73 (03) : 241 - 247
  • [3] Effect of Radial-to-Femoral Access Crossover on Adverse Outcomes in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Azzalini, Lorenzo
    Khan, Razi
    Al-Hawwas, Malek
    Hatem, Raja
    Fortier, Annik
    L'Allier, Philippe L.
    Ly, Hung Q.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 114 (08) : 1165 - 1173
  • [4] Left main percutaneous coronary intervention-Radial versus femoral access: A systematic analysis
    Goel, Sunny
    Pasam, Ravi T.
    Raheja, Hitesh
    Gotesman, Joseph
    Gidwani, Umesh
    Ahuja, Keerat R.
    Reed, Grant
    Puri, Rishi
    Khatri, Jai K.
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 95 (07) : E201 - E213
  • [5] Radial Versus Femoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Implications for Vascular Complications and Bleeding
    Nathan, Sandeep
    Rao, Sunil V.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 14 (04) : 502 - 509
  • [6] Radial versus femoral access in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and rotational atherectomy
    Januszek, Rafal
    Siudak, Zbigniew
    Malinowski, Krzysztof P.
    Reczuch, Krzysztof
    Dobrzycki, Slawomir
    Lesiak, Maciej
    Hawranek, Michal
    Gil, Robert J.
    Witkowski, Adam
    Wojakowski, Wojciech
    Lekston, Andrzej
    Gasior, Mariusz
    Wanha, Wojciech
    Dudek, Dariusz
    Bartus, Stanislaw
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2020, 78 (06) : 529 - 536
  • [7] Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography/Intervention in Women With Acute Coronary Syndromes Insights From the RIVAL Trial (Radial Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention)
    Pandie, Shaheen
    Mehta, Shamir R.
    Cantor, Warren J.
    Cheema, Asim N.
    Gao, Peggy
    Madan, Mina
    Niemela, Kari
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Schwalm, Jon David
    Valentin, Vicent
    Velianou, James L.
    Jolly, Sanjit S.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (04) : 505 - 512
  • [8] Barriers to use of radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention
    Riangwiwat, Tanawan
    Mumtaz, Tayebah
    Blankenship, James C.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 96 (02) : 268 - 273
  • [9] Radial Versus Femoral Access for Acute Coronary Syndromes
    Routledge, Helen
    Sastry, Sanjay
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 17 (12)
  • [10] Balanced Adoption of Radial Artery Access for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Anderson, H. Vernon
    Faxon, David P.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 2 (10) : 1059 - 1060