A Novel Robotic Monofilament Test for Diabetic Neuropathy

被引:11
|
作者
Wilasrusmee, Chumpon [1 ]
Suthakorn, Jackrit [2 ]
Guerineau, Claire [2 ]
Itsarachaiyot, Yuttana [2 ]
Sa-Ing, Vera [2 ]
Proprom, Napaphat [1 ]
Lertsithichai, Panuwat [1 ]
Jirasisrithum, Sopon [1 ]
Kittur, Dilip [3 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Ramathibodi Hosp, Dept Surg, Fac Med, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Ctr Biomed & Robot Technol, Fac Engn, Dept Biomed Engn,BART LAB, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
[3] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Dept Surg, Syracuse, NY USA
关键词
diabetic foot; Semmes-Weinstein monofilament; Toronto Clinical Scoring System; vibration perception test; SEMMES-WEINSTEIN MONOFILAMENT; PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY; SENSORY NEUROPATHY; SCREENING-TESTS; FOOT PROBLEMS; RISK-FACTORS; POLYNEUROPATHY;
D O I
10.1016/S1015-9584(11)60006-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The use of the Semmes-Weinstein (SW) monofilament test is recommended as a screening method for diabetic neuropathy. It offers an important chance to prevent further complications of diabetic foot. We aimed to develop a prototype Robotic Monofilament Inspector that can be used as a standard machine for screening of diabetic neuropathy. METHODS: :Development was divided into three parts: computer software, control box, and Robotic Monofilament Inspector. The examiner conducted the SW test (by hand and by robotic inspector), vibration perception threshold, and Toronto Clinical Scoring System without knowledge of patient information. The unpaired e test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine the differences between independent groups in terms of continuous outcomes, while the chi(2) test was used to determine categorical outcomes. Agreement between the various diabetic neuropathy tests was measured using the kappa statistic. RESULTS: The SW test and vibration perception threshold were more valid tests for neuropathy than the Toronto test. The robotic test was in excellent agreement with the two former tests and appeared to be valid (kappa statistic, 0.35-0.81). Another indirect evidence for the validity of the robotic test was the finding that diabetic patients with foot ulcers had a higher prevalence of neuropathy (77% vs. 38%). This might indicate that the robotic test was more valid than the manual test. CONCLUSION: The Robotic Monofilament Inspector could be used as a simple screening machine. This prototype may be developed further for routine clinical use. [Asian J Surg 2010;33(4):193-8]
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 198
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is it possible to substitute the monofilament test for the Ipswich Touch Test in screening for peripheral diabetic neuropathy?
    Alfonso Dutra, Luz Marina
    Moura, Mirian Conceicao
    Prado, Flaviene Alves
    Lima, Giselle De Oliveira
    Melo, Manuela Costa
    Morato Fernandez, Rubens Nelson
    Carvalho Garbi Novaes, Maria Rita
    DIABETOLOGY & METABOLIC SYNDROME, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [2] Is it possible to substitute the monofilament test for the Ipswich Touch Test in screening for peripheral diabetic neuropathy?
    Luz Marina Alfonso Dutra
    Mirian Conceição Moura
    Flaviene Alves do Prado
    Giselle De Oliveira Lima
    Manuela Costa Melo
    Rubens Nelson Morato Fernandez
    Maria Rita Carvalho Garbi Novaes
    Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, 12
  • [3] Diagnostic Accuracy of Monofilament Tests for Detecting Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Fengyi
    Zhang, Jiaqi
    Yu, Jiadan
    Liu, Shaxin
    Zhang, Rengang
    Ma, Xichao
    Yang, Yonghong
    Wang, Pu
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES RESEARCH, 2017, 2017
  • [4] The Semmes Weinstein monofilament examination as a screening tool for diabetic peripheral neuropathy
    Feng, Yuzhe
    Schlosser, Felix J.
    Sumpio, Bauer E.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 (03) : 675 - 682
  • [5] Accuracy of Monofilament Testing to Diagnose Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review
    Dros, Jacquelien
    Wewerinke, Astrid
    Bindels, Patrick J.
    van Weert, Henk C.
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2009, 7 (06) : 555 - 558
  • [6] Effectiveness of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination for diabetic peripheral neuropathy screening
    Kamei, N
    Yamane, K
    Nakanishi, S
    Yamashita, Y
    Tamura, T
    Ohshita, K
    Watanabe, H
    Fujikawa, R
    Okubo, M
    Kohno, N
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS, 2005, 19 (01) : 47 - 53
  • [7] Corneal Confocal Microscopy A novel noninvasive test to diagnose and stratify the severity of human diabetic neuropathy
    Tavakoli, Mitra
    Quattrini, Cristian
    Abbott, Caroline
    Kallinikos, Panagiotis
    Marshall, Andrew
    Finnigan, Joanne
    Morgan, Philip
    Efron, Nathan
    Boulton, Andrew J. M.
    Malik, Rayaz A.
    DIABETES CARE, 2010, 33 (08) : 1792 - 1797
  • [8] Clinical usefulness of the two-site Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy
    Lee, SY
    Kim, HH
    Choi, SH
    Park, YS
    Kim, YJ
    Cho, BM
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 18 (01) : 103 - 107
  • [9] FREQUENCY OF SENSORY NEUROPATHY IN FOOT OF ASYMPTOMATIC TYPE2 DIABETIC PATIENTS USING SEMMES-WEINSTEIN MONOFILAMENT
    Ahmed, Syed Rehan
    Zuberi, Bader Faiyaz
    Afsar, Salahuddin
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 25 (03) : 349 - 352
  • [10] Prediction of Incident Diabetic Neuropathy Using the Monofilament Examination A 4-year prospective study
    Perkins, Bruce A.
    Orszag, Andrej
    Ngo, Mylan
    Ng, Eduardo
    New, Patti
    Bril, Vera
    DIABETES CARE, 2010, 33 (07) : 1549 - 1554