Upstream oil and gas production and ambient air pollution in California

被引:35
作者
Gonzalez, David J. X. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Francis, Christina K. [4 ]
Shaw, Gary M. [5 ]
Cullen, Mark R. [6 ]
Baiocchi, Michael [7 ]
Burke, Marshall [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Emmett Interdisciplinary Program Environm & Resou, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Program Environm Sci & Studies, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Pediat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] Stanford Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Stanford, CA USA
[7] Stanford Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[8] Stanford Univ, Sch Earth Energy & Environm Sci, Dept Earth Syst Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Oil and gas; Exposure assessment; Ambient air pollution; Particulate matter; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150298
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: Prior studies have found that residential proximity to upstream oil and gas production is associated with increased risk of adverse health outcomes. Emissions of ambient air pollutants from oil and gas wells in the preproduction and production stages have been proposed as conferring risk of adverse health effects, but the extent of air pollutant emissions and resulting nearby pollution concentrations from wells is not clear. Objectives: We examined the effects of upstream oil and gas preproduction (count of drilling sites) and production (total volume of oil and gas) activities on concentrations of five ambient air pollutants in California. Methods: We obtained data on approximately 1 million daily observations from 314 monitors in the EPA Air Quality System, 2006-2019, including daily concentrations of five routinely monitored ambient air pollutants: PM2.5, CO, NO2, O-3, and VOCs. We obtained data on preproduction and production operations from Enverus and the California Geographic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) for all wells in the state. For each monitor and each day, we assessed exposure to upwind preproduction wells and total oil and gas production volume within 10 km. We used a panel regression approach in the analysis and fit adjusted fixed effects linear regression models for each pollutant, controlling for geographic, seasonal, temporal, and meteorological factors. Results: We observed higher concentrations of PM2.5 and CO at monitors within 3 km of preproduction wells, NO2 at monitors at 1-2 km, and O-3 at 2-4 km from the wells. Monitors with proximity to increased production volume observed higher concentrations of PM2.5, NO2, and VOCs within 1 km and higher O-3 concentrations at 1-2 km. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Adjusting for geographic, meteorological, seasonal, and time-trending factors, we observed higher concentrations of ambient air pollutants at air quality monitors in proximity to preproduction wells within 4 km and producing wells within 2 km. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Potential Public Health Hazards, Exposures and Health Effects from Unconventional Natural Gas Development [J].
Adgate, John L. ;
Goldstein, Bernard D. ;
McKenzie, Lisa M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (15) :8307-8320
[2]   Community Noise and Air Pollution Exposure During the Development of a Multi-Well Oil and Gas Pad [J].
Allshouse, William B. ;
McKenzie, Lisa M. ;
Barton, Kelsey ;
Brindley, Stephen ;
Adgate, John L. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 53 (12) :7126-7135
[3]   Spatiotemporal Industrial Activity Model for Estimating the Intensity of Oil and Gas Operations in Colorado [J].
Allshouse, William B. ;
Adgate, John L. ;
Blair, Benjamin D. ;
McKenzie, Lisa M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (17) :10243-10250
[4]  
Arbelaez J, 2015, CALIFORNIANS RISK AN
[5]   Association of Air Pollution and Heat Exposure With Preterm Birth, Low Birth Weight, and Stillbirth in the US A Systematic Review [J].
Bekkar, Bruce ;
Pacheco, Susan ;
Basu, Rupa ;
DeNicola, Nathaniel .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (06)
[6]   Air Monitoring Stations Far Removed From Drilling Activities Do Not Represent Residential Exposures to Marcellus Shale Air Pollutants. Response to the Paper by Hess et al. on Proximity-Based Unconventional Natural Gas Exposure Metrics [J].
Buonocore, Jonathan J. ;
Casey, Joan A. ;
Croy, Rachel ;
Spengler, John D. ;
McKenzie, Lisa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (02)
[7]   Unconventional Natural Gas Development and Birth Outcomes in Pennsylvania, USA [J].
Casey, Joan A. ;
Savitz, David A. ;
Rasmussen, Sara G. ;
Ogburn, Elizabeth L. ;
Pollak, Jonathan ;
Mercer, Dione G. ;
Schwartz, Brian S. .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 27 (02) :163-172
[8]   Associations of unconventional natural gas development with depression symptoms and disordered sleep in Pennsylvania [J].
Casey, Joan A. ;
Wilcox, Holly C. ;
Hirsch, Annemarie G. ;
Pollak, Jonathan ;
Schwartz, Brian S. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
[9]   Hydraulic fracturing and infant health: New evidence from Pennsylvania [J].
Currie, Janet ;
Greenstone, Michael ;
Meckel, Katherine .
SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2017, 3 (12)
[10]  
Czolowski ED, 2017, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V125, DOI [10.1289/EHP1535, 10.1289/ehp1535]