Robotic Salvage Lymph Node Dissection in Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Lessons Learned from 68 Cases and Implications for Future Clinical Management

被引:7
作者
Linxweiler, Johannes [1 ]
Sprenk, Jan [1 ]
Cascetta, Katerina [1 ]
Pryalukhin, Alexej [2 ,5 ]
Hoelters, Sebastian [1 ,6 ]
Zeuschner, Philip [1 ]
Nini, Alessandro [1 ]
Al-Kailani, Zaid [1 ]
Ezziddin, Samer [3 ]
Bohle, Rainer M. [2 ]
Fries, Peter [4 ]
Ohlmann, Carsten H. [1 ,7 ]
Heinzelbecker, Julia [1 ]
Siemer, Stefan [1 ]
Stoeckle, Michael [1 ]
Junker, Kerstin [1 ]
Saar, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Saarland Univ, Dept Urol, Homburg, Germany
[2] Saarland Univ, Dept Gen & Surg Pathol, Homburg, Germany
[3] Saarland Univ, Dept Nucl Med, Homburg, Germany
[4] Saarland Univ, Clin Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Homburg, Germany
[5] Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Dept Pathol, Vienna, Austria
[6] Ingn Buro Gesundheitswesen GmbH, Leipzig, Germany
[7] Malteser Hosp Seliger Gerhard, Dept Urol, Bonn, Germany
关键词
recurrence; prostatic neoplasms; positron emission tomography computed tomography; robotic surgical procedures; lymph node excision; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000001697
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Salvage lymph node dissection is a rescue treatment for patients with nodal recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Very limited data are available on robotic salvage lymph node dissection. Our purpose was to investigate perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic salvage lymph node dissection in a large monocentric series. Materials and Methods: Perioperative data, complications within 30 days after surgery and oncological outcomes as assessed by histology, prostate specific antigen changes, prostate specific antigen nadir after salvage lymph node dissection, and time to further therapy were analyzed. To identify predictive factors for oncological outcome, Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analyses were performed. For cases with a mismatch between preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography and the number of histologically positive lymph nodes, prostate specific membrane antigen immunohistochemistry was performed on removed lymph nodes. Results: A total of 68 patients underwent robotic salvage lymph node dissection with a median operation time of 126 minutes, a blood loss of 50 ml, and a length of stay of 4 days. No major complications (>Clavien 3) occurred. Median followup was 12.1 months. Median time to further therapy was 12.4 months, 37% of patients experienced complete biochemical response (prostate specific antigen <0.2 ng/ml) and 11% reached an undetectable prostate specific antigen, which was maintained for >1 year in 3 cases. Lower preoperative prostate specific antigen, longer time between radical prostatectomy and salvage lymph node dissection, preoperative prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography and complete biochemical response after salvage lymph node dissection were significant predictors of longer therapy-free survival (all p<0.005). Prostate specific membrane antigen immunohistochemistry revealed that prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography tends to miss small lymph node metastases <5 mm. Conclusions: Robotic salvage lymph node dissection is a feasible approach with low perioperative morbidity and delays further systemic therapy in most patients. Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography detection is mostly limited to tumor foci >5 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 96
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Robotic salvage retroperitoneal and pelvic lymph node dissection for 'node-only' recurrent prostate cancer: technique and initial series [J].
Abreu, Andre ;
Fay, Carlos ;
Park, Daniel ;
Quinn, David ;
Dorff, Tanya ;
Carpten, John ;
Kuhn, Peter ;
Gill, Parkash ;
Almeida, Fabio ;
Gill, Inderbir .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (03) :401-408
[2]   Diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer: evaluation in 1007 patients [J].
Afshar-Oromieh, Ali ;
Holland-Letz, Tim ;
Giesel, Frederik L. ;
Kratochwil, Clemens ;
Mier, Walter ;
Haufe, Sabine ;
Debus, Nils ;
Eder, Matthias ;
Eisenhut, Michael ;
Schaefer, Martin ;
Neels, Oliver ;
Hohenfellner, Markus ;
Kopka, Klaus ;
Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich ;
Debus, Juergen ;
Haberkorn, Uwe .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2017, 44 (08) :1258-1268
[3]   MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis [J].
Ahdoot, Michael ;
Wilbur, Andrew R. ;
Reese, Sarah E. ;
Lebastchi, Amir H. ;
Mehralivand, Sherif ;
Gomella, Patrick T. ;
Bloom, Jonathan ;
Gurram, Sandeep ;
Siddiqui, Minhaj ;
Pinsky, Paul ;
Parnes, Howard ;
Linehan, W. Marston ;
Merino, Maria ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Shih, Joanna H. ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Wood, Bradford J. ;
Pinto, Peter A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (10) :917-928
[4]   Novel Insights into the Management of Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review [J].
Battaglia, Antonino ;
De Meerleer, Gert ;
Tosco, Lorenzo ;
Moris, Lisa ;
Van den Broeck, Thomas ;
Devos, Gaetan ;
Everaerts, Wouter ;
Joniau, Steven .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (02) :174-188
[5]   Reply to Verane Achard, Alan Dal Pra, and Thomas Zilli's Letter to the Editor re: Carlo A. Bravi, Nicola Fossati, Giorgio Gandaglia, et al. Long-term Outcomes of Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Nodal Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Not as Good as Previously Thought. Eur Urol 2020;78:661-9 [J].
Bravi, Carlo A. ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Briganti, Alberto .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (06) :E223-E224
[6]   Assessing the Best Surgical Template at Salvage Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Nodal Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: When Can Bilateral Dissection be Omitted? Results from a Multi-institutional Series [J].
Bravi, Carlo A. ;
Fossati, Nicola ;
Gandaglia, Giorgio ;
Suardi, Nazareno ;
Mazzone, Elio ;
Robesti, Daniele ;
Osmonov, Daniar ;
Juenemann, Klaus-Peter ;
Boeri, Luca ;
Karnes, R. Jeffrey ;
Kretschmer, Alexander ;
Buchner, Alexander ;
Stief, Christian ;
Hiester, Andreas ;
Nini, Alessandro ;
Albers, Peter ;
Devos, Gaetan ;
Joniau, Steven ;
Van Poppel, Hendrik ;
Shariat, Shahrokh F. ;
Heidenreich, Axel ;
Pfister, David ;
Tilki, Derya ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Gill, Inderbir S. ;
Mottrie, Alexander ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre, I ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Briganti, Alberto .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (06) :779-782
[7]  
CLAVIEN PA, 1992, SURGERY, V111, P518
[8]   A Systematic Review on the Role of Imaging in Early Recurrent Prostate Cancer [J].
De Visschere, Pieter J. L. ;
Standaert, Chloe ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Villeirs, Geert M. ;
Panebianco, Valeria ;
Walz, Jochen ;
Maurer, Tobias ;
Hadaschik, Boris A. ;
Lecouvet, Frederic E. ;
Giannarini, Gianluca ;
Fanti, Stefano .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (01) :47-76
[9]   Comparison of Peri-operative and Early Oncological Outcomes of Robot-Assisted vs. Open Salvage Lymph Node Dissection in Recurrent Prostate Cancer [J].
Devos, Gaetan ;
Muilwijk, Tim ;
Raskin, Yannic ;
Calderon, Victor ;
Moris, Lisa ;
Van den Broeck, Thomas ;
Berghen, Charlien ;
De Meerleer, Gert ;
Albersen, Maarten ;
Van Poppel, Ilendrik ;
Everaerts, Wouter ;
Joniau, Steven .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
[10]   Underestimation of Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography in Assessing Tumor Burden in Prostate Cancer Nodal Recurrence: Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA and 11C-Choline in a Large, Multi-Institutional Series of Extended Salvage Lymph Node Dissections [J].
Fossati, Nicola ;
Scarcella, Simone ;
Gandaglia, Giorgio ;
Suardi, Nazareno ;
Robesti, Daniele ;
Boeri, Luca ;
Karnes, R. Jeffrey ;
Heidenreich, Axel ;
Pfister, David ;
Kretschmer, Alexander ;
Buchner, Alexander ;
Stief, Christian ;
Battaglia, Antonino ;
Joniau, Steven ;
Van Poppel, Hendrik ;
Osmonov, Daniar ;
Juenemann, Klaus-Peter ;
Shariat, Shahrokh ;
Hiester, Andreas ;
Nini, Alessandro ;
Albers, Peter ;
Tilki, Derya ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Gill, Inderbir S. ;
Mottrie, Alexander ;
Galosi, Andrea Benedetto ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Briganti, Alberto .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (02) :296-301