The impacts of democracy on innovation: Revisited evidence

被引:117
作者
Wang, Quan-Jing [1 ]
Feng, Gen-Fu [2 ]
Wang, Hai-Jie [1 ]
Chang, Chun-Ping [3 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Business Sch, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Shih Chien Univ, Dept Mkt Management, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
Democracy; Political regime; Innovation; Panel GMM; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY-RIGHTS; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; COUNTRY; POLICY; DETERMINANTS; INTELLIGENCE; TRADE; ENTREPRENEURSHIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102333
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This research empirically tests the Popper hypothesis (2012) by utilizing panel data that cover 132 countries over the time period 1980-2017 and via panel GMM estimation in order to investigate the causal link from democracy to innovation, which is captured by two comprehensive variables, patent application and trademark application. Aside from the relationship between democracy and innovation, we further explore whether or not the change of democracy significantly influences innovation, whether the influence of democracy on innovation varies among different kinds of democracy or autocracy, and hence pay more attention on factors such as economic development level, economic performance, globalization, and international trade, and how do they change the democracy's impact on technical innovation. To confirm credibility, we carry out the robustness test by changing the measurement of democracy, the measurement of innovation and deleting extreme values. In summary, while democracy promotes innovation performance, autocracy generally exhibits lower technological innovation performance. This study provides evidence on the influence of democracy on innovation being affected by other factors such as those stated above.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]   Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge [J].
Acs, ZJ ;
Anselin, L ;
Varga, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (07) :1069-1085
[2]   WHY ISNT THE WHOLE WORLD EXPERIMENTING WITH THE EAST-ASIAN MODEL TO DEVELOP - REVIEW OF THE EAST-ASIAN MIRACLE [J].
AMSDEN, AH .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1994, 22 (04) :627-633
[3]   Urbanization, productivity, and innovation: Evidence from investment in higher education [J].
Andersson, Roland ;
Quigley, John M. ;
Wilhelmsson, Mats .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2009, 66 (01) :2-15
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, INT TAX PUBL FINANCE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, REVISITING GROWTH EF
[6]  
Arin K. P., 2011, Research Paper No. 104
[7]   Revisiting the Determinants of Entrepreneurship: A Bayesian Approach [J].
Arin, K. Peren ;
Huang, Victor Zengyu ;
Minniti, Maria ;
Nandialath, Anup Menon ;
Reich, Otto F. M. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2015, 41 (02) :607-631
[8]   Democracy and Political Trust Before and After the Great Recession 2008: The European Union and the United Nations [J].
Arpino, Bruno ;
Obydenkova, Anastassia V. .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2020, 148 (02) :395-415
[9]   Technology transfer in a global economy [J].
Audretsch, David B. ;
Lehmann, Erik E. ;
Wright, Mike .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2014, 39 (03) :301-312