Caudate Encodes Multiple Computations for Perceptual Decisions

被引:215
作者
Ding, Long [1 ]
Gold, Joshua I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Neurosci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENTS; BASAL GANGLIA; PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIMATE CAUDATE; DISCRIMINATION TASK; REWARD MODULATION; MACAQUE MONKEY; RESPONSE BIAS; NEURAL BASIS; AREA LIP;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2894-10.2010
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Perceptual decision making is a complex process that requires multiple computations, including the accumulation of sensory evidence and an ongoing evaluation of the accumulation process to use for prediction and adjustment. Implementing these computations likely involves interactions among many brain regions. For perceptual decisions linked to oculomotor actions, neural correlates of sensory evidence accumulation have been identified in several cortical areas, including the frontal eye field and lateral intraparietal area, and one of their direct, subcortical targets, the superior colliculus. These structures are also connected indirectly, via the basal ganglia. The basal ganglia pathway has been theorized to contribute to perceptual decision making, but the nature of this contribution has yet to be examined directly. Here we show that in monkeys performing a reaction-time visual motion direction-discrimination task, neurons in a primary input structure of the basal ganglia, the caudate nucleus, encode three aspects of decision making: evidence accumulation, evaluation, and choice biases. These results indicate that the basal ganglia pathway can provide important signals to influence and assess perceptual decisions that guide oculomotor behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:15747 / 15759
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Modulation of neuronal activity by target uncertainty [J].
Basso, MA ;
Wurtz, RH .
NATURE, 1997, 389 (6646) :66-69
[2]   The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions [J].
Bogacz, Rafal ;
Gurney, Kevin .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2007, 19 (02) :442-477
[3]   The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks [J].
Bogacz, Rafal ;
Brown, Eric ;
Moehlis, Jeff ;
Holmes, Philip ;
Cohen, Jonathan D. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2006, 113 (04) :700-765
[4]   Relationship between the corticostriatal terminals from areas 9 and 46, and those from area 8A, dorsal and rostral premotor cortex and area 24c: an anatomical substrate for cognition to action [J].
Calzavara, Roberta ;
Mailly, Philippe ;
Haber, Suzanne N. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 26 (07) :2005-2024
[5]   NEURAL COMPUTATION OF LOG LIKELIHOOD IN CONTROL OF SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENTS [J].
CARPENTER, RHS ;
WILLIAMS, MLL .
NATURE, 1995, 377 (6544) :59-62
[6]   Visual and anticipatory bias in three cortical eye fields of the monkey during an adaptive decision-making task [J].
Coe, B ;
Tomihara, K ;
Matsuzawa, M ;
Hikosaka, O .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 22 (12) :5081-5090
[7]   Modeling the effects of payoff on response bias in a perceptual discrimination task: Bound-change, drift-rate-change, or two-stage-processing hypothesis [J].
Diederich, Adele ;
Busemeyer, Jerome R. .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2006, 68 (02) :194-207
[8]   Comparison of reward modulation in the frontal eye field and caudate of the macaque [J].
Ding, L ;
Hikosaka, O .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 26 (25) :6695-6703
[9]  
Dorris MC, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P7015
[10]   Can Monkeys Choose Optimally When Faced with Noisy Stimuli and Unequal Rewards? [J].
Feng, Samuel ;
Holmes, Philip ;
Rorie, Alan ;
Newsome, William T. .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2009, 5 (02)