The SPARK Tool to prioritise questions for systematic reviews in health policy and systems research: development and initial validation

被引:15
|
作者
Akl, Elie A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fadlallah, Racha [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Ghandour, Lilian [6 ]
Kdouh, Ola [7 ]
Langlois, Etienne [8 ]
Lavis, John N. [3 ,9 ,10 ,11 ]
Schunemann, Holger [3 ,12 ,13 ]
El-Jardali, Fadi [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Internal Med, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Ctr Systemat Reviews Hlth Policy & Syst Res SPARK, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, Fac Hlth Sci, Beirut, Lebanon
[5] Amer Univ Beirut, Knowledge Policy Ctr K2P, Beirut, Lebanon
[6] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Fac Hlth Sci, Beirut, Lebanon
[7] Minist Publ Hlth, Primary Healthcare Dept, Beirut, Lebanon
[8] World Hlth Org, Alliance Hlth Policy & Syst Res, Ave Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[9] McMaster Univ, McMaster Hlth Forum, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[10] McMaster Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[11] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Global Hlth & Populat, Boston, MA USA
[12] McMaster Univ, McMaster GRADE Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[13] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS | 2017年 / 15卷
关键词
Systematic review; Health policy and systems research; Priority setting; Evidence-informed policymaking; Health system strengthening; Development of a tool; MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES; SETTING PRIORITIES; CAPACITY; WASTE;
D O I
10.1186/s12961-017-0242-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Groups or institutions funding or conducting systematic reviews in health policy and systems research (HPSR) should prioritise topics according to the needs of policymakers and stakeholders. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a tool to prioritise questions for systematic reviews in HPSR. Methods: We developed the tool following a four-step approach consisting of (1) the definition of the purpose and scope of tool, (2) item generation and reduction, (3) testing for content and face validity, (4) and pilot testing of the tool. The research team involved international experts in HPSR, systematic review methodology and tool development, led by the Center for Systematic Reviews on Health Policy and Systems Research (SPARK). We followed an inclusive approach in determining the final selection of items to allow customisation to the user's needs. Results: The purpose of the SPARK tool was to prioritise questions in HPSR in order to address them in systematic reviews. In the item generation and reduction phase, an extensive literature search yielded 40 relevant articles, which were reviewed by the research team to create a preliminary list of 19 candidate items for inclusion in the tool. As part of testing for content and face validity, input from international experts led to the refining, changing, merging and addition of new items, and to organisation of the tool into two modules. Following pilot testing, we finalised the tool, with 22 items organised in two modules - the first module including 13 items to be rated by policymakers and stakeholders, and the second including 9 items to be rated by systematic review teams. Users can customise the tool to their needs, by omitting items that may not be applicable to their settings. We also developed a user manual that provides guidance on how to use the SPARK tool, along with signaling questions. Conclusion: We have developed and conducted initial validation of the SPARK tool to prioritise questions for systematic reviews in HPSR, along with a user manual. By aligning systematic review production to policy priorities, the tool will help support evidence-informed policymaking and reduce research waste. We invite others to contribute with additional real-life implementation of the tool.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] The SPARK Tool to prioritise questions for systematic reviews in health policy and systems research: development and initial validation
    Elie A. Akl
    Racha Fadlallah
    Lilian Ghandour
    Ola Kdouh
    Etienne Langlois
    John N. Lavis
    Holger Schünemann
    Fadi El-Jardali
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 15
  • [2] The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence
    Munn, Zachary
    Moola, Sandeep
    Riitano, Dagmara
    Lisy, Karolina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 3 (03) : 123 - 128
  • [3] Development and Validation of a Literature Screening Tool: Few-Shot Learning Approach in Systematic Reviews
    Wiwatthanasetthakarn, Phongphat
    Ponthongmak, Wanchana
    Looareesuwan, Panu
    Tansawet, Amarit
    Numthavaj, Pawin
    Mckay, Gareth J.
    Attia, John
    Thakkinstian, Ammarin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [4] Identifying health policy and systems research priorities for the sustainable development goals: social protection for health
    Qiu, Mary
    Jessani, Nasreen
    Bennett, Sara
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2018, 17
  • [5] Reporting of Financial and Non-financial Conflicts of Interest in Systematic Reviews on Health Policy and Systems Research: A Cross Sectional Survey
    Bou-Karroum, Lama
    Hakoum, Maram B.
    Hammoud, Mira Z.
    Khamis, Assem M.
    Al-Gibbawi, Mounir
    Badour, Sanaa
    Hasbani, Divina Justina
    Lopes, Luciane Cruz
    El-Rayess, Hebah M.
    El-Jardali, Fadi
    Guyatt, Gordon
    Akl, Elie A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 7 (08) : 711 - 717
  • [6] Evaluation of research co-design in health: a systematic overview of reviews and development of a framework
    Peters, Sanne
    Guccione, Lisa
    Francis, Jill
    Best, Stephanie
    Tavender, Emma
    Curran, Janet
    Davies, Katie
    Rowe, Stephanie
    Palmer, Victoria J.
    Klaic, Marlena
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [7] Understanding the implications of the Sustainable Development Goals for health policy and systems research: results of a research priority setting exercise
    Sara Bennett
    Nasreen Jessani
    Douglas Glandon
    Mary Qiu
    Kerry Scott
    Ankita Meghani
    Fadi El-Jardali
    Daniel Maceira
    Dena Javadi
    Abdul Ghaffar
    Globalization and Health, 16
  • [8] Understanding the implications of the Sustainable Development Goals for health policy and systems research: results of a research priority setting exercise
    Bennett, Sara
    Jessani, Nasreen
    Glandon, Douglas
    Qiu, Mary
    Scott, Kerry
    Meghani, Ankita
    El-Jardali, Fadi
    Maceira, Daniel
    Javadi, Dena
    Ghaffar, Abdul
    GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2020, 16 (01)
  • [9] Social values and health systems in health policy and systems research: a mixed-method systematic review and evidence map
    Whyle, Eleanor
    Olivier, Jill
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2020, 35 (06) : 735 - 751
  • [10] Identifying health policy and systems research priorities for the sustainable development goals: social protection for health
    Mary Qiu
    Nasreen Jessani
    Sara Bennett
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 17