Time to Achieve Blood Pressure Goal with a Combination Versus a Conventional Monotherapy Approach in Hypertensive Patients with Metabolic Syndrome

被引:8
|
作者
Fogari, Roberto [1 ]
Zoppi, Annalisa [1 ]
Ferrari, Ilaria [1 ]
Mugellini, Amedeo [1 ]
Preti, Paola [1 ]
Derosa, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Fondaz IRCC Policlin S Matteo, Dept Internal Med & Therapeut, Clin Med II, Ctr Ipertens & Fisiopatol Cardiovasc, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
关键词
valsartan; amlodipine; hypertension; metabolic syndrome; combination therapy; PLUS HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; CALCIUM-ANTAGONIST; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; ADULT PATIENTS; RISK-FACTORS; AMLODIPINE; VALSARTAN; EFFICACY; TOLERABILITY;
D O I
10.3109/10641960903265212
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The time to achieve a blood pressure (BP) goal <= 130/85 mmHg with a combination versus a conventional monotherapy approach was evaluated in 308 hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome. They were randomized to valsartan (V) 8 mg/amlodipine (A) 5 mg combination or to V 160 mg monotherapy for 12 weeks and every 2 weeks, there was a titration in nonresponder patients: in the combination group V/A was progressively increased to V 160/A 5 mg; V160/A 7.5 mg; V160/A 10 mg; V 240/A 10 mg, and V 320/A 10 mg. In the monotherapy group, the regimen was progressively modified as following: V 240 mg; V 320 mg; V 320/A 5 mg; V 320/A 7.5 mg, and V 320/A 10 mg. The mean time to achieve the BP goal was shorter in patients randomized to combination therapy compared to those randomized to conventional monotherapy (4.7 +/- 2.7 weeks vs. 7.1 +/- 3.9 weeks, respectively, p < 0.001). The percentage of patients who achieved target BP in the combination approach group statistically exceeded that of the monotherapy treated one already after 2 weeks of treatment (30.5 vs. 14.9%, p < 0.01) and again after 4, 6, 8, and 10 weeks of treatment. Only at 12 weeks the percentage of normalized patients was similar in the two treatment groups (78.8% vs. 75.3%, ns). These results suggest that initial therapy with a V/A combination approach may be more quickly effective than a conventional sequential monotherapy approach in achieving target BP in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 250
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combination therapy with lercanidipine and enalapril reduced central blood pressure augmentation in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome
    Ghiadoni, Lorenzo
    Bruno, Rosa Maria
    Cartoni, Giulia
    Stea, Francesco
    Magagna, Armando
    Virdis, Agostino
    Grassi, Davide
    Ferri, Claudio
    Taddei, Stefano
    VASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 92 : 16 - 21
  • [2] Time to achieve blood-pressure goal: Influence of dose of valsartan monotherapy and valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy
    Weir, Matthew R.
    Levy, Drew
    Crikelair, Nora
    Rocha, Ricardo
    Meng, Xiangyi
    Glazer, Robert
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2007, 20 (07) : 807 - 815
  • [3] Olmesartan/Amlodipine Combination Versus Olmesartan or Amlodipine Monotherapies on Blood Pressure and Insulin Resistance in a Sample of Hypertensive Patients
    Derosa, Giuseppe
    Cicero, Arrigo F. G.
    Carbone, Anna
    Querci, Fabrizio
    Fogari, Elena
    D'Angelo, Angela
    Maffioli, Pamela
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION, 2013, 35 (05) : 301 - 307
  • [4] Achieving blood pressure goal: initial therapy with valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination compared with monotherapy
    Weinberger, M. H.
    Glazer, R. D.
    Crikelair, N. A.
    Chiang, Y. T.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2010, 24 (12) : 823 - 830
  • [5] Effective and safe reduction of blood pressure with the combination of amlodipine 5 mg and valsartan 160 mg in hypertensive patients not controlled by calcium channel blocker monotherapy
    Johannes Brachmann
    Anwar Ansari
    Gerhard Mahla
    Renate Handrock
    Sven Klebs
    Advances in Therapy, 2008, 25 : 399 - 411
  • [6] Effective and safe reduction of blood pressure with the combination of amlodipine 5 mg and valsartan 160 mg in hypertensive patients not controlled by calcium channel blocker monotherapy
    Brachmann, Johannes
    Ansari, Anwar
    Mahla, Gerhard
    Handrock, Renate
    Klebs, Sven
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2008, 25 (05) : 399 - 411
  • [7] Valsartan 160 mg/Amlodipine 5 mg Combination Therapy versus Amlodipine 10 mg in Hypertensive Patients with Inadequate Response to Amlodipine 5 mg Monotherapy
    Sung, Jidong
    Jeong, Jin-Ok
    Kwon, Sung Uk
    Won, Kyung Heon
    Kim, Byung Jin
    Cho, Byung Ryul
    Kim, Myeong-Kon
    Lee, Sahng
    Kim, Hak Jin
    Lim, Seong-Hoon
    Park, Seung Woo
    Park, Jeong Euy
    KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2016, 46 (02) : 222 - 228
  • [8] Metabolic syndrome and exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients
    Tsioufis, Costas
    Kasiakogias, Alexandros
    Tsiachris, Dimitris
    Kordalis, Athanasios
    Thomopoulos, Costas
    Giakoumis, Michalis
    Bounas, Pavlos
    Pittaras, Andreas
    Michaelides, Andreas
    Stefanadis, Christodoulos
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 19 (03) : 467 - 473
  • [9] Blood pressure effects of high-dose amlodipinebenazepril combination in black and white hypertensive patients not controlled on monotherapy
    Chrysant S.G.
    Drugs in R&D, 2012, 12 (2) : 57 - 64
  • [10] Should blood pressure goal be individualized in hypertensive patients?
    Yannoutsos, Alexandra
    Kheder-Elfekih, Rania
    Halimi, Jean-Michel
    Safar, Michel E.
    Blacher, Jacques
    PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 118 : 53 - 63