Marketing Strategies for Cultured Meat: A Review

被引:22
作者
Siddiqui, Shahida Anusha [1 ,2 ]
Khan, Sipper [3 ]
Murid, Misbah [4 ]
Asif, Zarnab [4 ]
Oboturova, Natalya Pavlovna [5 ]
Nagdalian, Andrey Ashotovich [5 ,6 ]
Blinov, Andrey Vladimirovich [5 ]
Ibrahim, Salam A. [7 ]
Jafari, Seid Mahdi [8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Campus Straubing Biotechnol & Sustainabil, Essigberg 3, D-94315 Straubing, Germany
[2] German Inst Food Technol DIL eV, Prof Klitzing Str 7, D-49610 Quakenbruck, Germany
[3] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Agr Engn, Trop & Subtrop Grp, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany
[4] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Natl Inst Food Sci & Technol, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
[5] North Caucasus Fed Univ, Dept Food Technol & Engn, Stavropol 355017, Russia
[6] St Petersburg State Agr Univ, St Petersburg 196605, Russia
[7] North Carolina Agr & Tech State Univ, E Market St 1601, Greensboro, NC USA
[8] Gorgan Univ Agr Sci & Nat Resources, Fac Food Sci & Technol, Gorgan 49165, Golestan, Iran
[9] Univ Vigo, Fac Sci, Dept Analyt Chem & Food Sci, Nutr & Bromatol Grp, Orense 32004, Spain
[10] Hebei Agr Univ, Coll Food Sci & Technol, Baoding 071001, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 17期
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
cultured meat; marketing strategies; affordability; familiarity; drivers; consumer acceptability; IN-VITRO MEAT; STEM-CELLS; REGULATORY CHALLENGES; CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE; PROCESSING WASTE; FOOD; ALTERNATIVES; PERCEPTIONS; PROSPECTS; FUTURE;
D O I
10.3390/app12178795
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Environmentally intense and negative consequences relateing to conventional meat production systems have induced some actors to suggest alternative meat sources. Diseases carried by animals, human perception of cruelty to animals, and public health concerns about cardiovascular diseases have provided the basis for the development of cultured meat. The current market is influenced by many factors, including regulators, affordability, religion, and media perception. The existing cultured meat market is also regulated by legislatures, affordability, consumer religion, and the media. Consumer perception is distributed across various aspects, including ethical priorities, nutritional profile of the meat consumed, age-based acceptance, gender differentiation, political orientation, land-based attitude, education status, socioeconomic factors, and familiarity factor with the existing product in the market. Inhibiting barriers reported among consumers-including low naturalness, safety, nutritional concerns, trust, neophobia, economic, and ethical approaches-should be employed as marketing tactics directly to address their respective concerns. Tissue culture, starter cells, printing, and 3D printing are some of the methods currently being used for the production of cultured meat. Similarly, many hybrid technologies are also being used to produce meat-like products to increase consumer familiarity along and market presence. Existing research frameworks have improved the previous mindset of consumers with media coverage, educational frameworks, and the textural attributes of cultured meat. Additional benefits of CUME may include being environmentally friendly with less production of greenhouse gases. However, consumer trust, affordability, improving nutritional status, and widescale adoption are just a few of the parameters that need to be addressed to enhance consumer acceptability of these products. The aim of this article was to analyze the current state of cultured meat and the marketing content challenges and strategies used to advance public acceptance of cultured meat.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]   Plant-based meat alternatives: Compositional analysis, current development and challenges [J].
Ahmad, Mudasir ;
Qureshi, Shahida ;
Akbar, Mansoor Hussain ;
Siddiqui, Shahida Anusha ;
Gani, Adil ;
Mushtaq, Mehvesh ;
Hassan, Ifrah ;
Dhull, Sanju Bala .
APPLIED FOOD RESEARCH, 2022, 2 (02)
[2]   Bioprocess Design Considerations for Cultured Meat Production With a Focus on the Expansion Bioreactor [J].
Allan, Scott J. ;
De Bank, Paul A. ;
Ellis, Marianne J. .
FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2019, 3
[3]  
Anderson J., 2018, Attitudes toward farmed animals in the BRIC countries
[4]   CasADi: a software framework for nonlinear optimization and optimal control [J].
Andersson, Joel A. E. ;
Gillis, Joris ;
Horn, Greg ;
Rawlings, James B. ;
Diehl, Moritz .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING COMPUTATION, 2019, 11 (01) :1-36
[5]   Should we stop meating like this? Reducing meat consumption through substitution [J].
Apostolidis, Chrysostomos ;
McLeay, Fraser .
FOOD POLICY, 2016, 65 :74-89
[6]   Properties and Applications of Superhydrophobic Coatings in High Voltage Outdoor Insulation: A Review [J].
Arshad ;
Momen, G. ;
Farzaneh, M. ;
Nekahi, A. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DIELECTRICS AND ELECTRICAL INSULATION, 2017, 24 (06) :3630-3646
[7]  
Arshad MS, 2017, COGENT FOOD AGR, V3, DOI 10.1080/23311932.2017.1320814
[8]   Tissue Engineering for Clean Meat Production [J].
Ben-Arye, Tom ;
Levenberg, Shulamit .
FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2019, 3
[9]   In vitro meat: A future animal-free harvest [J].
Bhat, Zuhaib Fayaz ;
Kumar, Sunil ;
Bhat, Hina Fayaz .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2017, 57 (04) :782-789
[10]   Surface-Oxidized Polymer-Stabilized Silver Nanoparticles as a Covering Component of Suture Materials [J].
Blinov, Andrey Vladimirovich ;
Nagdalian, Andrey Ashotovich ;
Povetkin, Sergey Nikolaevich ;
Gvozdenko, Alexey Alekseevich ;
Verevkina, Marina Nikolaevna ;
Rzhepakovsky, Igor Vladimirovich ;
Lopteva, Mariya Sergeevna ;
Maglakelidze, David Guramievich ;
Kataeva, Tatyana Semenovna ;
Blinova, Anastasiya Aleksandrovna ;
Golik, Alexey Borisovich ;
Osipchuk, Galina Vladimirovna ;
Shariati, Mohammad Ali .
MICROMACHINES, 2022, 13 (07)