Auto-Targeted Neurostimulation Is Not Superior to Placebo in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Fourfold Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:0
作者
Ferrandiz, Maria Encarnacion Aguilar [2 ,5 ]
Nijs, Jo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gidron, Yori [6 ]
Roussel, Nathalie [1 ,7 ]
Vanderstraeten, Rob [4 ]
Van Dyck, Dries [4 ]
Huysmans, Eva [1 ,2 ]
De Kooning, Margot [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Www Paininmotion Be, Pain Mot Int Res Grp, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, Fac Phys Educ & Physiotherapy, Dept Physiotherapy Human Physiol & Anat, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Hosp Brussels, Dept Phys Med & Physiotherapy, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ Antwerp, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Antwerp, Belgium
[5] Univ Granada, Dept Phys Therapy, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[6] Vrije Univ Brussel, Fac Med & Pharm, Ctr Neurosci 4, Brussels, Belgium
[7] Univ Antwerp, Fac Med, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Low back pain; chronic pain; randomized controlled trial; electric stimulation therapy; trigger points; MYOFASCIAL TRIGGER POINTS; CENTRAL SENSITIZATION; MANAGEMENT; PREVALENCE; MODULATION; DISABILITY; KNEE; NECK; STIMULATION; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) are common in people with musculoskeletal pain and may play a role in chronic nonspecific low back pain (CLBP). One of the potential treatments of MTrPs is the Nervomatrix Soleve (R) auto-targeted neurostimulation device, providing targeted transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) to MTrPs in the lower back muscles. To date, no controlled studies have evaluated the effectiveness of this device for the pain management of this population. Objective: To examine whether the Nervomatrix Soleve (R) auto-targeted neurostimulation device is superior over placebo for the treatment of CLBP. Study Design: A fourfold-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. Setting: Brussels University Hospital, health care centers and pharmacies around Belgium. Methods: Participants with CLBP for at least 3 months were randomly assigned to the experimental (the Nervomatrix Soleve (R) auto-targeted neurostimulation device providing TENS-stimulation and mechanical pressure) or placebo group (the Nervomatrix Soleve (R) auto-targeted neurostimulation device providing mechanical pressure alone without current). The treatment protocol in both groups consisted of 6 treatment sessions per patient. Participants were evaluated at baseline prior to the intervention, immediately following treatment, and at one month follow-up. Pain and pain behavior (steps climbed) were assessed as primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures were pain functioning, health beliefs, symptoms of central sensitization, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia. Results: In total, 39 participants were included in the study. Participants in both groups improved significantly for pain and functioning, but no significant differences were observed between groups. These improvements were not clinically meaningful for any of the reported measures. The health beliefs changed significantly in both groups (P < 0.05), with superior results at follow-up in the placebo group. Limitations: The follow-up period is limited to one month. Conclusions: Treatment of MTrPs with the Nervomatrix Soleve (R) auto-targeted neurostimulation device in patients with CLBP does not result in a better outcome than placebo-treatment in terms of pain, pain behavior, functioning, central sensitization, pain catastrophizing, and health beliefs.
引用
收藏
页码:E707 / E719
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Chapter 4 - European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain
    Airaksinen, O.
    Brox, J. I.
    Cedraschi, C.
    Hildebrandt, J.
    Klaber-Moffett, J.
    Kovacs, F.
    Mannion, A. F.
    Reis, S.
    Staal, J. B.
    Ursin, H.
    Zanoli, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (Suppl 2) : S192 - S300
  • [2] Performance Tests in People With Chronic Low Back Pain Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Change
    Andersson, Eleonor I.
    Lin, Christine C.
    Smeets, Rob J. E. M.
    [J]. SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) : E1559 - E1563
  • [3] Does pre-surgical central modulation of pain influence outcome after total knee replacement? A systematic review
    Baert, I. A. C.
    Lluch, E.
    Mulder, T.
    Nijs, J.
    Noten, S.
    Meeus, M.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2016, 24 (02) : 213 - 223
  • [4] Objective Sonographic Measures for Characterizing Myofascial Trigger Points Associated With Cervical Pain
    Ballyns, Jeffrey J.
    Shah, Jay P.
    Hammond, Jennifer
    Gebreab, Tadesse
    Gerber, Lynn H.
    Sikdar, Siddhartha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (10) : 1331 - 1340
  • [5] Effect of TENS on pain in relation to central sensitization in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
    Beckwee, David
    De Hertogh, Willem
    Lievens, Pierre
    Bautmans, Ivan
    Vaes, Peter
    [J]. TRIALS, 2012, 13
  • [6] Physiologic Effects of Dry Needling
    Cagnie, Barbara
    Dewitte, Vincent
    Barbe, Tom
    Timmermans, Frank
    Delrue, Nicolas
    Meeus, Mira
    [J]. CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2013, 17 (08)
  • [7] The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey -: The prevalence of low back pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults
    Cassidy, JD
    Carroll, LJ
    Côté, P
    [J]. SPINE, 1998, 23 (17) : 1860 - 1866
  • [8] Optimal stimulation duration of tens in the management of osteoarthritic knee pain
    Cheing, GLY
    Tsui, AYY
    Lo, SK
    Hui-Chan, CWY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2003, 35 (02) : 62 - 68
  • [9] Cho Sang-Hyun, 1994, Yonsei Medical Journal, V35, P464
  • [10] Testing factorial validity and gender invariance of the pain catastrophizing scale
    D'Eon, JL
    Harris, CA
    Ellis, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2004, 27 (04) : 361 - 372