Enabling individualized recommendations and dynamic pricing of value-added services through willingness-to-pay data

被引:15
作者
Backhaus, Klaus [2 ]
Becker, Joerg [1 ]
Beverungen, Daniel [1 ]
Frohs, Margarethe [2 ]
Mueller, Oliver [1 ]
Weddeling, Matthias [2 ]
Knackstedt, Ralf [1 ]
Steiner, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Munster, D-48143 Munster, Germany
关键词
Collaborative filtering; Dynamic pricing; Willingness-to-pay; Service science; Design science; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; INFORMATION; SYSTEMS; SCIENCE; DESIGN; WEB;
D O I
10.1007/s12525-010-0032-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
When managing their growing service portfolio, many manufacturers in B2B markets face two significant problems: They fail to communicate the value of their service offerings and they lack the capability to generate profits with value-added services. To tackle these two issues, we have built and evaluated a collaborative filtering recommender system which (a) makes individualized recommendations of potentially interesting value-added services when customers express interest in a particular physical product and also (b) leverages estimations of a customer's willingness to pay to allow for a dynamic pricing of those services and the incorporation of profitability considerations into the recommendation process. The recommender system is based on an adapted conjoint analysis method combined with a stepwise componential segmentation algorithm to collect individualized preference and willingness-to-pay data. Compared to other state-of-the-art approaches, our system requires significantly less customer input before making a recommendation, does not suffer from the usual sparseness of data and cold-start problems of collaborative filtering systems, and, as is shown in an empirical evaluation with a sample of 428 customers in the machine tool market, does not diminish the predictive accuracy of the recommendations offered.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 146
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   ORTHOGONAL MAIN-EFFECT PLANS FOR ASYMMETRICAL FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS [J].
ADDELMAN, S .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1962, 4 (01) :21-+
[2]   Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions [J].
Adomavicius, G ;
Tuzhilin, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2005, 17 (06) :734-749
[3]  
Alderson Wroe., 1957, MARKETING BEHAV EXEC
[4]  
Allenby G. M., 2006, The Handbook of Marketing Research: Uses, Misuses, and Future Advances, P418, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412973380.N20
[5]  
[Anonymous], P C HUM FACT COMP SY
[6]   Internet recommendation systems [J].
Ansari, A ;
Essegaier, S ;
Kohli, R .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2000, 37 (03) :363-375
[7]   Fab: Content-based, collaborative recommendation [J].
Balabanovic, M ;
Shoham, Y .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1997, 40 (03) :66-72
[8]  
Becker J, 2009, ENTERP MODELLING INF, V4, P26
[9]  
Bergen M., 2003, European Management Journal, V21, P663
[10]   Applications of flexible pricing in business-to-business electronic commerce [J].
Bichler, M ;
Kalagnanam, J ;
Katircioglu, K ;
King, AJ ;
Lawrence, RD ;
Lee, HS ;
Lin, GY ;
Lu, Y .
IBM SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2002, 41 (02) :287-302