Network structure of scientific collaborations between China and the EU member states

被引:33
|
作者
Wang, Lili [1 ]
Wang, Xianwen [2 ]
Philipsen, Niels J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, UNU MERIT, Boschstr 24, NL-6211 AX Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, WISE Lab, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[3] Maastricht Univ, METRO, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Univ, RILE, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
基金
奥地利科学基金会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
International collaboration; Science; Network; Structure; Centrality; Integration; EU member states; INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; PATTERNS; COOPERATION; EVOLUTION; INSTITUTIONS; CENTRALITY; DISTANCE; CITATION; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-017-2488-6
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Collaborations between China and the European Union (EU) member states involve not only connections between China and individual countries, but also interactions between the different EU member states, the latter of which is due also to the influence exerted by the EU's integration strategy. The complex linkages between China and the EU28, as well as among the 28 EU member states, are of great importance for studying knowledge flows. Using co-authorship analysis, this study explores the changes of the network structure between 2000 and 2014. Our results show that EU member states with middle- or low- scientific capacities, in particular those who joined the EU after 2000, have been actively reshaping the network of scientific collaborations with China. The linkages between middle- and low- scientific capacity countries have been tremendously strengthened in the later years. The network positional advantage (measured by the degree of betweenness centrality) has shifted from a few dominant nations to a wider range of countries. We also find that countries like Belgium, Sweden and Denmark are in important positions connecting the relatively low-capacity 'new' EU member states with China. The 'new' EU member states-that have relatively low scientific capacity-intend to cooperate with China jointly with 'old' EU member(s).
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 781
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Network structure of scientific collaborations between China and the EU member states
    Lili Wang
    Xianwen Wang
    Niels J. Philipsen
    Scientometrics, 2017, 113 : 765 - 781
  • [2] The world network of scientific collaborations between cities: domestic or international dynamics?
    Maisonobe, Marion
    Eckert, Denis
    Grossetti, Michel
    Jegou, Laurent
    Milard, Beatrice
    JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2016, 10 (04) : 1025 - 1036
  • [3] Winners and losers in US-China scientific research collaborations
    Lee, Jenny J.
    Haupt, John P.
    HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 80 (01) : 57 - 74
  • [4] Scientific collaboration between 'old' and 'new' member states: Did joining the European Union make a difference?
    Makkonen, Teemu
    Mitze, Timo
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 106 (03) : 1193 - 1215
  • [5] The effect of competitive public funding on scientific output: A comparison between China and the EU
    Wang, Lili
    Wang, Xianwen
    Piro, Fredrik Niclas
    Philipsen, Niels J.
    RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2020, 29 (04) : 418 - 430
  • [6] Network Effects on Scientific Collaborations
    Uddin, Shahadat
    Hossain, Liaquat
    Rasmussen, Kim
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (02):
  • [7] Strategic cultures between the EU member states: convergence or divergence?
    Mi, Xue
    EUROPEAN SECURITY, 2023, 32 (04) : 558 - 582
  • [8] EU-China Security Relations: Discourse vs Practice and the Role of EU Member States
    Montesano, Francesco Saverio
    INTERNATIONAL SPECTATOR, 2019, 54 (02) : 139 - 158
  • [9] The Global Structure of International Scientific Collaborations
    Zelnio, Ryan
    PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2011: THE 13TH CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 898 - 913
  • [10] China's emerging centrality in the contemporary international scientific collaboration network
    Zhang, Zhihui
    Rollins, Jason E.
    Lipitakis, Evangelia
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 116 (02) : 1075 - 1091