High performance liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric determination of ginsenoside Rg3 and its metabolites in rat plasma using solid-phase extraction for pharmacokinetic studies

被引:106
作者
Xie, HT
Wang, GJ
Sun, JG
Tucker, I
Zhao, XC
Xie, YY
Li, H
Jiang, XL
Wang, R
Xu, MJ
Wang, W
机构
[1] China Pharmaceut Univ, Key Lab Drug Metab & Pharmacokinet, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu Prov, Peoples R China
[2] China Pharmaceut Univ, New Drug Screening Ctr Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210009, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES | 2005年 / 818卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ginsenoside Rg3; Rh2; 20(S)-protopanaxadiol (ppd); pharmacokinetics;
D O I
10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.12.028
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
To support pharmacokinetic studies of ginsenosides, a novel method to quantitatively analyze ginsenoside Rg3 (Rg3), its prosapogenin ginsenoside Rh2 (Rh2) and aglycone 20(S)-protopanaxadiol (ppd) in rat plasma was developed and validated. The method was based on gradient separation of ginsenosides present in rat plasma using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), followed by detection with electrospray ionization(ESI) mass spectrometry (MS) in negative ion mode with the mobile phase additive, ammonium chloride (500 mu M). Differentiation of ginsenosides was achieved through simultaneous detection of the [M+Cl-] adduct of ginsenoside Rg3 and [M+Cl-] adducts of its deglycosylated metabolites Rh2 and ppd, and other ions after solid phase extraction (SPE). The /specific ions monitored were m/z 819.50 for Rg3. m/z 657.35 for Rh2, m/z 495.40 for ppd and m/z 799.55 for the internal standard (digitoxin). The mean recoveries for Rg3, Rh2 and ppd were 77.85, 82.65 and 98.33%, respectively using 0.1 rut plasma for extraction. The lower limits of quantification were 10.0, 2.0 and 8.0 ng/ml (equivalent to 0.1, 0.02 and 0.08 ng in each 10 mu l injection onto the HPLC column) for Rg3, Rh2 and ppd, respectively. The method has been demonstrated to be highly sensitive and accurate for the determination of Rg3 and its metabolites in rat plasma. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 173
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Ginseng pharmacology - Multiple constituents and multiple actions [J].
Attele, AS ;
Wu, JA ;
Yuan, CS .
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 58 (11) :1685-1693
[2]   Metabolism of 20(S)- and 20(R)-ginsenoside Rg3 by human intestinal bacteria and its relation to in vitro biological activities [J].
Bae, EA ;
Han, MJ ;
Choo, MK ;
Park, SY ;
Kim, DH .
BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN, 2002, 25 (01) :58-63
[3]   Differentiation and authentication of Panax ginseng, Panax quinquefolius, and ginseng products by using HPLC/MS [J].
Chan, TWD ;
But, PPH ;
Cheng, SW ;
Kwok, IMY ;
Lau, FW ;
Xu, HX .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 72 (06) :1281-1287
[4]  
Chen Dafu, 2003, Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, V34, P546
[5]  
CHEN SE, 1980, EUR J DRUG METAB PH, P161
[6]   Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric determination of 20(S)-protopanaxadiol and 20(S)-protopanaxatriol for study on human urinary excretion of ginsenosides after ingestion of ginseng preparations [J].
Cui, JF ;
Bjorkhem, I ;
Eneroth, P .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 1997, 689 (02) :349-355
[7]   Liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometric identification of ginsenosides in Panax ginseng roots [J].
Fuzzati, N ;
Gabetta, B ;
Jayakar, K ;
Pace, R ;
Peterlongo, F .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 1999, 854 (1-2) :69-79
[8]  
HUO YS, 1986, ZHONGGUO YAO LI XUE, P519
[9]   Simultaneous determination of ginsenoside Rb1 and Rg1 in human plasma by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [J].
Ji, HY ;
Lee, HW ;
Kim, HK ;
Kim, HH ;
Chang, SG ;
Sohn, DH ;
Kim, J ;
Lee, HS .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2004, 35 (01) :207-212
[10]   Quantitative determination of ginsenosides by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J].
Ji, QC ;
Harkey, MR ;
Henderson, GL ;
Gershwin, ME ;
Stern, JS ;
Hackman, RM .
PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS, 2001, 12 (05) :320-326