Toward a Resolution of the Tripartite Structure of Subjective Well-Being

被引:67
作者
Busseri, Michael A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brock Univ, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
关键词
LIFE-SATISFACTION; POSITIVE AFFECT; PERSONALITY; HAPPINESS; ADAPTATION; MODEL; STABILITY; COMPONENT; JUDGMENT;
D O I
10.1111/jopy.12116
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Diener (1984) introduced the concept of subjective well-being (SWB) as comprising three primary components: life satisfaction (LS), positive affect (PA), and negative affect (NA). Busseri and Sadava (2011) identified multiple competing conceptualizations of the tripartite structure of SWB and delineated problems with this ambiguity with respect to defining, operationalizing, analyzing, and synthesizing information concerning SWB. The present work provides an empirical evaluation of four competing structural approaches in which SWB is conceptualized variously as three separate components (Model 1), a hierarchical construct (Model 2), a causal system (Model 3), and a composite (Model 4). Data from a longitudinal study of middle-aged Americans (N=3,707; 20-75 years old, 55% female, 94% Caucasian) were used to examine the relatedness versus independence of the three SWB components within and across time, as well as predictive effects on SWB. The various structural models differ in how adequately they accommodate the joint relatedness/independence of the SWB components and lead to different conclusions concerning predictive effects on SWB. Conceptual and empirical considerations are considered within and across models. Implications and next steps for further understanding the tripartite structure of SWB are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 428
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Agent-Based Simulations of Subjective Well-Being [J].
Baggio, Jacopo A. ;
Papyrakis, Elissaios .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2014, 115 (02) :623-635
[22]   A bifactor model of subjective well-being: A re-examination of the structure of subjective well-being [J].
Jovanovic, Veljko .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2015, 87 :45-49
[23]   The Structure of Subjective Well-being: A Vector Autoregressive Approach [J].
Binder, Martin ;
Ward, Felix .
METROECONOMICA, 2013, 64 (02) :361-400
[24]   Italian and Swedish adolescents: differences and associations in subjective well-being and psychological well-being [J].
Garcia, Danilo ;
Sagone, Elisabetta ;
De Caroli, Maria Elvira ;
Al Nima, Ali .
PEERJ, 2017, 5
[25]   Are changes in the perception of major life events associated with changes in subjective well-being [J].
Haehner, Peter ;
Pfeifer, Lena Sophie ;
Fassbender, Ina ;
Luhmann, Maike .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2023, 102
[26]   Genetic Contribution to the Individual Differences in Subjective Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Vukasovic, Tena ;
Bratko, Denis ;
Butkovic, Ana .
DRUSTVENA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2012, 21 (01) :1-17
[27]   Subjective well-being of college students: Developmental trajectories, predictors, and risk for depression [J].
Liu, Xinqiao ;
Li, Yan ;
Gao, Wenjuan .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY IN AFRICA, 2024, 34 (05) :477-486
[28]   Subjective Well-Being and Policy [J].
Bruno S. Frey ;
Jana Gallus .
Topoi, 2013, 32 :207-212
[29]   Subjective Well-Being of Orphans [J].
Dahlan, Tina Hayati ;
Wyandini, Diah Zaleha ;
Hasanah, Viena Rusmiati .
ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2019, 25 (01) :216-220
[30]   Dimensions of Subjective Well-Being [J].
Kapteyn, Arie ;
Lee, Jinkook ;
Tassot, Caroline ;
Vonkova, Hana ;
Zamarro, Gema .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2015, 123 (03) :625-660