Techno-optimism and policy-pessimism in the public sector big data debate

被引:62
作者
Vydra, Simon [1 ,2 ]
Klievink, Bram [2 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Jaffalaan 5, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Fac Governance & Global Affairs, Turfmarkt 99, NL-2511 DP Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Big data; Analytics; Government; Public administration; Policy-making; Decision-making; Science-policy interface; Network governance; DECISION-MAKING; SOCIAL MEDIA; DATA SPEAK; POLITICS; RATIONALITY; ANONYMITY; PRIVACY; LESSONS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.010
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Despite great potential, high hopes and big promises, the actual impact of big data on the public sector is not always as transformative as the literature would suggest. In this paper, we ascribe this predicament to an overly strong emphasis the current literature places on technical-rational factors at the expense of political decision-making factors. We express these two different emphases as two archetypical narratives and use those to illustrate that some political decision-making factors should be taken seriously by critiquing some of the core lechno-optimise tenets from a more 'policy-pessimist' angle. In the conclusion we have these two narratives meet 'eye-to-eye', facilitating a more systematized interrogation of big data promises and shortcomings in further research, paying appropriate attention to both technical-rational and political decision-making factors. We finish by offering a realist rejoinder of these two narratives, allowing for more context-specific scrutiny and balancing both technical-rational and political decision-making concerns, resulting in more realistic expectations about using big data for policy-making in practice.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   How to De-Identify Your Data [J].
Angiuli, Olivia ;
Blitzstein, Joe ;
Waldo, Jim .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2015, 58 (12) :48-55
[2]  
Angwin Julia, 2016, PROPUBLICA
[3]  
Angwin Julia, 2016, ProPublica responds to company's critique of machine bias story
[4]  
[Anonymous], USING BEHAV BIG DATA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 18403 MPRA
[6]  
[Anonymous], 22 M EUR STAT SYST C
[7]  
[Anonymous], 31 FEEM, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1594132
[8]  
[Anonymous], CAN ACCURACY PRIVACY
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2016, FED PROBAT
[10]  
[Anonymous], EUR C QUAL OFF STAT