Semi-Dry Carbonation Process Using Fly Ash from Solid Refused Fuel Power Plant

被引:10
|
作者
Kim, Jung Hyun [1 ]
Kwon, Woo Teck [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst Ceram Engn & Technol KICET, Div Energy & Environm, 101 Soho Ro, Jinju Si 52581, Gyeongsangnam D, South Korea
来源
SUSTAINABILITY | 2019年 / 11卷 / 03期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
SRF; fly ash; carbon dioxide; carbonation; CO2; capture; CO2; CAPTURE; ADSORPTION; SORBENT; STABILITY; SYSTEM; NOX;
D O I
10.3390/su11030908
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The increasing CO2 concentration in the Earth's atmosphere, mainly caused by fossil fuel combustion, has led to concerns about global warming. Carbonation is a technique that can be used as a carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology for CO2 sequestration. In this study, the utilization of the fly ash from a solid refused fuel (SRF) power plant as a solid sorbent material for CO2 capture via semi-dry carbonation reaction was evaluated as a simple process to reduce CO2. The fly ash was exposed to accelerated carbonation conditions at a relative humidity of 25, 50, 75, and 100%, to investigate the effects of humidity on the carbonation kinetics of the fly ash. The reaction conditions such as moisture, concentration of CO2, and reaction time can affect CO2 capture performance of fly ash. Due to a short diffusion length of H2CO3 in water, the semi-dry process exhibits faster carbonation reaction than the wet process. Especially, the semi-dry process does not require a wastewater treatment plant because it uses a small amount of water. This study may have important implications, illustrating the possibility of replacing the wet process with the semi-dry process.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Processing and properties of a glass-ceramic from coal fly ash from a thermal power plant through an economic process
    Kim, JM
    Kim, HS
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2004, 24 (09) : 2825 - 2833
  • [42] Introducing an integrated chemical looping hydrogen production, inherent carbon capture and solid oxide fuel cell biomass fueled power plant process configuration
    Aghaie, Mahsa
    Mehrpooya, Mehdi
    Pourfayaz, Fathollah
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 124 : 141 - 154
  • [43] Impact of coal source changes on mercury content in fly ash: Examples from a Kentucky power plant
    Hower, James C.
    Clack, Herek L.
    Hood, Madison M.
    Hopps, Shelley G.
    Thomas, Gerald H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2017, 170 : 2 - 6
  • [44] Study of Modified Dry Desulfurization Ash in a Power Plant for Sequestering CO2 from a Micron-Nanoscale Perspective
    Cai, Jieying
    Li, Xiangdong
    Chen, Di
    Feng, Qiyan
    JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01) : 382 - 391
  • [45] Optimization of major elements recovery from thermal power plant fly ash using Taguchi experimental design
    Kurklu, K.
    Sayilgan, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 17 (05) : 2645 - 2654
  • [46] Optimization of major elements recovery from thermal power plant fly ash using Taguchi experimental design
    K. Kurklu
    E. Sayilgan
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2020, 17 : 2645 - 2654
  • [47] Treatment of fly ash from power plants using thermal plasma
    Al-Mayman, Sulaiman
    AlShunaifi, Ibrahim
    Albeladi, Abdullah
    Ghiloufi, Imed
    Binjuwair, Saud
    BEILSTEIN JOURNAL OF NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 8 : 1043 - 1048
  • [48] Process development for chemical stabilization of fly ash from municipal solid waste incineration
    Vavva, Chrisanthi
    Voutsas, Epaminondas
    Magoulas, Kostis
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2017, 125 : 57 - 71
  • [49] Particle size effect on the filtration drag of fly ash from a coal power plant
    Joo-Hong Choi
    Soon-Jong Ha
    Young-Chul Bak
    Young-Ok Park
    Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2002, 19 : 1085 - 1090
  • [50] Characterization of heavy metal trace elements in the fly ash from a thermal power plant
    Kumar, Satish
    Kumar, Kaushal
    Gupta, Munish
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2016, 38 (16) : 2370 - 2376