Discrimination Learning and Attentional Set Formation in a Mouse Model of Fragile X

被引:16
作者
Casten, Kimberly S. [1 ]
Gray, Annette C. [1 ]
Burwell, Rebecca D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Dept Cognit Linguist & Psychol Sci, Dept Neurosci, Providence, RI 02906 USA
关键词
prefrontal; cognition; transgenic mice; behavior; FMR1 KNOCKOUT MICE; FUNCTIONAL BRAIN ACTIVATION; MENTAL-RETARDATION; DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT; DENDRITIC SPINES; GENE-EXPRESSION; WORKING-MEMORY; FULL MUTATION; YOUNG MALES; DEFICITS;
D O I
10.1037/a0023561
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Fragile X Syndrome is the most prevalent genetic cause of mental retardation. Selective deficits in executive function, including inhibitory control and attention, are core features of the disorder. In humans, Fragile X results from a trinucleotide repeat in the Fmr1 gene that renders it functionally silent and has been modeled in mice by targeted deletion of the Fmr1 gene. Fmr1 knockout (KO) mice recapitulate many features of Fragile X syndrome, but evidence for deficits in executive function is inconsistent. To address this issue, we trained wild-type and Fmr1 KO mice on an experimental paradigm that assesses attentional set-shifting. Mice learned to discriminate between stimuli differing in two of three perceptual dimensions. Successful discrimination required attending only to the relevant dimension, while ignoring irrelevant dimensions. Mice were trained on three discriminations in the same perceptual dimension, each followed by a reversal. This procedure normally results in the formation of an attentional set to the relevant dimension. Mice were then required to shift attention and discriminate based on a previously irrelevant perceptual dimension. Wild-type mice exhibited the increase in trials to criterion expected when shifting attention from one perceptual dimension to another. In contrast, the Fmr1 KO group failed to show the expected increase, suggesting impairment in forming an attentional set. Fmr1 KO mice also exhibited a general impairment in learning discriminations and reversals. This is the first demonstration that Fmr1 KO mice show a deficit in attentional set formation.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 479
页数:7
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   NUCLEUS BASALIS MAGNOCELLULARIS AND HIPPOCAMPUS ARE THE MAJOR SITES OF FMR-1 EXPRESSION IN THE HUMAN FETAL BRAIN [J].
ABITBOL, M ;
MENINI, C ;
DELEZOIDE, AL ;
RHYNER, T ;
VEKEMANS, M ;
MALLET, J .
NATURE GENETICS, 1993, 4 (02) :147-153
[2]  
BAKKER CE, 1994, CELL, V78, P23
[3]  
Birrell JM, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20, P4320
[4]   Double Dissociation of the Effects of Medial and Orbital Prefrontal Cortical Lesions on Attentional and Affective Shifts in Mice [J].
Bissonette, Gregory B. ;
Martins, Gabriela J. ;
Franz, Theresa M. ;
Harper, Elizabeth S. ;
Schoenbaum, Geoffrey ;
Powell, Elizabeth M. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 28 (44) :11124-11130
[5]   Discrimination of multidimensional visual stimuli by mice: Intra- and extradimensional shifts [J].
Brigman, JL ;
Bussey, TJ ;
Saksida, LM ;
Rothblat, LA .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 119 (03) :839-842
[6]   Fragile X mice develop sensory hyperreactivity to auditory stimuli [J].
Chen, L ;
Toth, M .
NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 103 (04) :1043-1050
[7]   Attentional set-shifting in mice:: modification of a rat paradigm, and evidence for strain-dependent variation [J].
Colacicco, G ;
Welzl, H ;
Lipp, HP ;
Würbel, H .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 132 (01) :95-102
[8]   Abnormal dendritic spines in fragile X knockout mice: Maturation and pruning deficits [J].
Comery, TA ;
Harris, JB ;
Willems, PJ ;
Oostra, BA ;
Irwin, SA ;
Weiler, IJ ;
Greenough, WT .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (10) :5401-5404
[9]   Theory of mind deficits in children with fragile X syndrome [J].
Cornish, K ;
Burack, JA ;
Rahman, A ;
Munir, F ;
Russo, N ;
Grant, C .
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2005, 49 :372-378
[10]   Attention and language in fragile X [J].
Cornish, K ;
Sudhalter, V ;
Turk, J .
MENTAL RETARDATION AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2004, 10 (01) :11-16