Identifying coal-fired power plants for early retirement

被引:46
|
作者
Maamoun, Nada [1 ,2 ]
Kennedy, Ryan [3 ]
Jin, Xiaomeng [4 ,5 ]
Urpelainen, Johannes [6 ]
机构
[1] Helmut Schmidt Univ, Dept Econ, Holstenhofweg 85,H1 Rm 2175, D-22043 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Inst Law & Econ, Johnsallee 35, D-20148 Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Houston, Dept Polit Sci, 3551 Cullen Blvd,Rm 447 PGH, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Palisades, NY 10964 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, Palisades, NY 10964 USA
[6] Johns Hopkins SAIS, Rome Bldg,4th Floor 1619 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036 USA
来源
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS | 2020年 / 126卷 / 126期
关键词
Coal energy; Plant retirement; Air pollution; Climate change; HYSPLIT model; CLIMATE POLICY; AIR-POLLUTION; EMISSIONS; HEALTH; IMPACT; CHINA; WIND; GENERATION; DIOXIDE; CAPTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2020.109833
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To ensure climate stability, the decarbonization of the global economy is necessary. Coal-fired power generation is both the most carbon-intensive form of electricity supply and associated with adverse health effects. Thus, retiring coal-fired power plants is essential for achieving the goals of the Paris agreement on climate change. Here we introduce a retirement index that ranks coal-fired power plants based on their age, carbon emissions, and potential for air pollution. We use data on 2143 operating coal-fired plants globally. Based on the index, the top plants identified for retirement are located in China, India and South Korea and account for a total capacity of 87 GW. These plants represent 1% of global coal fired plants yet account for 4.5% of global operating capacity. The results contrast with the commonly used approach that ranks plants based on age and thus prioritizes older plants in developed countries for early retirement rather than younger plants in developing countries. We run several sensitivity checks and results show that China and India remain consistently the top countries with most capacity in need of retirement.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Plasma or Retirement. Alternatives to the Coal-Fired Power Plants
    Matveev, Igor B.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 2011, 39 (12) : 3259 - 3262
  • [2] Coal-Fired Power Plants
    Peter Pauls
    热力透平, 2004, (02) : 105 - 107
  • [3] Coal-Fired Power Plants Alternative Petcoke Fired Power Plants
    Ozcelik, Ozlem
    Boran, Kurtulus
    JOURNAL OF POLYTECHNIC-POLITEKNIK DERGISI, 2016, 19 (04): : 531 - 535
  • [4] Coal ... Coal-fired power plants for the future
    Heyn, Klaus
    Brennstoff-Waerme-Kraft, 1999, 51 (5-6): : 18 - 24
  • [5] Coal-Fired Power Plants of Japan
    A. N. Tugov
    I. V. Artemeva
    Power Technology and Engineering, 2024, 58 (4) : 644 - 653
  • [6] Tribology in coal-fired power plants
    Moumakwa, DO
    Marcus, K
    TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 38 (09) : 805 - 811
  • [7] Future coal-fired power plants
    Pruschek, R
    BWK, 2001, 53 (12): : 40 - +
  • [8] Advanced coal-fired power plants
    Ruth, LA
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2001, 123 (01): : 4 - 9
  • [9] Modern coal-fired power plants
    Scheffknecht, G
    Stamatelopoulos, GN
    Lorey, H
    BWK, 2002, 54 (06): : 46 - +
  • [10] Measurement Solutions in Coal-fired Power Plants
    Gagg, Richard
    Stuart, Derek
    Hauer, Randy
    POWER ENGINEERING, 2010, 114 (11) : 136 - +