Understanding Bibliometric Parameters and Analysis

被引:217
作者
Choudhri, Asim F. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Siddiqui, Adeel [1 ,2 ]
Khan, Nickalus R. [3 ]
Cohen, Harris L. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Le Bonheur Childrens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Memphis, TN 38103 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiol, Memphis, TN USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Memphis, TN USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Memphis, TN USA
[5] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pediat, Memphis, TN USA
[6] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Obstet, Memphis, TN USA
关键词
FREQUENTLY CITED ARTICLES; H-INDEX; CITATION-CLASSICS; JOURNALS; IMPACT; RADIOLOGY; WORKS; INDICATOR; UROLOGY; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1148/rg.2015140036
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Bibliometric parameters have become an important part of modern assessment of academic productivity. These parameters exist for the purpose of evaluating authors (publication count, citation count, h-index, m-quotient, h(c)-index, epsilon-index, g-index, i-10 [i-n] index) and journals (impact factor, Eigenfactor, article influence score, SC-Imago journal rank, source-normalized impact per paper). Although in recent years there has been a proliferation of bibliometric parameters, the true meaning and appropriate use of these parameters is generally not well understood. Effective use of existing and emerging bibliometric tools can aid in assessment of academic productivity, including readiness for promotions and other awards. However, if not properly understood, the data can be misinterpreted and may be subject to manipulation. Familiarity with bibliometric parameters will aid in their effective implementation in the review of authors-whether individuals or groups-and journals, as well as their possible use in the promotions review process, maximizing the effectiveness of bibliometric analysis. (C) RSNA, 2015 . radiographics.rsna.org
引用
收藏
页码:736 / 746
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields [J].
Alonso, S. ;
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. ;
Herrera, F. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2009, 3 (04) :273-289
[2]   The 50 most cited articles in pediatric orthopedic surgery [J].
Baldwin, Keith D. ;
Kovatch, Kevin ;
Namdari, Surena ;
Sankar, Wudbhuv ;
Flynn, John M. ;
Dormans, John P. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2012, 21 (05) :463-468
[3]   Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar [J].
Bar-Ilan, Judit .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, 74 (02) :257-271
[4]   Does Citation Analysis Reveal Association Between h-Index and Academic Rank in Urology? [J].
Benway, Brian M. ;
Kalidas, Poonam ;
Cabello, Jose M. ;
Bhayani, Sam B. .
UROLOGY, 2009, 74 (01) :30-33
[5]  
Bergstrom C., 2007, COLL RES LIBR NEWS, V68, P314, DOI DOI 10.5860/CRLN.68.5.7804
[6]   The Eigenfactor™ Metrics [J].
Bergstrom, Carl T. ;
West, Jevin D. ;
Wiseman, Marc A. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 28 (45) :11433-11434
[7]   The 100 Most-cited Articles in the Imaging Literature [J].
Brinjikji, Waleed ;
Klunder, Alexa ;
Kallmes, David F. .
RADIOLOGY, 2013, 269 (01) :272-276
[8]   Top 100 cited AJR articles at the AJR's centennial [J].
Bui-Mansfield, LT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (01) :3-6
[9]   Whatever happened to the 50 most frequently cited articles published in AJR? [J].
Bui-Mansfield, LT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 185 (03) :597-601