Fire and explosion risk assessment for large-scale oil export terminal

被引:24
作者
Shebeko, Yu. N. [1 ]
Bolodian, I. A. [1 ]
Molchanov, V. P. [1 ]
Deshevih, Yu. I. [1 ]
Gordlenko, D. M. [1 ]
Smolin, I. M. [1 ]
Kirillov, D. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] All Russian Sci Res Inst Fire Protect, Moscow 143903, Moscow Region, Russia
关键词
risk; oil terminal; explosion; fire;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2007.04.008
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Now in Russian Federation and other countries large-scale oil terminals (volume of one tank exceeds 100 000 m(3), total volume of tanks exceeds 300 000 m) are designed and constructed. Therefore fire safety of such objects becomes a very important task, solution of which is hardly possible without detail fire risk assessment. This study is aimed to a solution of this problem. Potential, individual and social risks were calculated. The potential risk was defined as a frequency of occurrence of hazardous factors of fires and explosions in a given point of space (the so-called risk contours). The individual risk was defined as a frequency of injuring a given person by hazardous factors of fires and explosions. Time of presence of this person in hazardous zones (near the hazardous installation) is taken into account during calculations of the individual risk. Social risk was defined as a dependence of frequency of injuring a given number of people by hazardous factors of fires and explosions on this number. In practice the social risk is usually determined on injuring not less than 10 people. The oil terminal under consideration includes the following main parts: crude oil storage consisting of three tanks of volume 100 000 m(3) each, input crude oil pipeline of diameter 0.6 m, crude oil pumps, output crude oil pipeline of diameter 0.8 m, auxiliary buildings and facilities. The following main scenarios of tank fires have been considered: rim seal fire, pool fire on a surface of a floating roof, pool fire on a total cross-section surface of the tank, pool fire in a dyke, explosions in closed or semiclosed volumes. Fires and explosions in other parts of the terminal are also taken into account. Effects of escalation of accidents are considered. Risk contours have been calculated both for the territory of the terminal and for the neighbouring space. The potential risk for the storage zone is near 10(-4)-10(-5) year(-1), and at a distance 500 m from the terminal the potential risk values do not exceed 10(-6) year(-1). The values of the individual risk for various categories of workers are in the range of 10(-5)-10(-6)year(-1). Because of low number of the workers on the terminal and large distances to towns and villages the social risk value is negligible. These risk values are consistent with practice of the best oil companies, and fire hazard level of the terminal can be accepted as tolerable. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 658
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   RISK ANALYSIS AND RISK POLICY IN THE NETHERLANDS AND THE EEC [J].
ALE, BJM .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 1991, 4 (01) :58-64
[2]  
BEZRODNY IP, 1996, EXTINGUISHING FIRES
[3]  
BOLODIAN IA, 2001, FIRE SAFETY, V1, P59
[4]  
CLAY GA, 1988, J HAZARD MATER, V20, P357, DOI 10.1016/0304-3894(88)87022-5
[5]  
*CPR 14 E, 1997, METH CALC PHYS EFF
[6]  
*CPR 16 E, 1989, METH DET POSS DAM
[7]  
*CPR 18 E, 1999, GUID QUANT RISK ASS
[8]  
ELOKHIN AN, 2000, ANAL CONTROL RISK TH
[9]  
GORSSTHWHITE PJ, 1988, I CHEM ENG S, P110
[10]  
GREENSPAN NP, 1987, J FLUID MECH, V87, P179