Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET in the follow-up of platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma

被引:48
作者
Garcia-Velloso, Maria Jose
Jurado, Matias
Ceamanos, Carolina
Manuel Aramendia, Jose
Puy Garrastachu, Maria
Lopez-Garcia, Guillermo
Angel Richter, Jose
机构
[1] Univ Navarra, Fac Med, Clin Univ, Dept Nucl Med, Pamplona 31008, Spain
[2] Univ Navarra, Clin Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gynecol, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain
[3] Univ Navarra, Clin Univ, Fac Med, Dept Oncol, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain
关键词
FDG-PET; recurrent ovarian cancer; diagnosis; conventional imaging; serum CA 125 levels;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-007-0366-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose This study was designed to retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic yield of FDG PET for the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer. Methods Eighty FDG PET scans were performed on 55 patients owing to suspicion of relapse, and 45 FDG PET scans were performed on 31 patients who were clinically disease free. PET results were compared with the results of conventional radiological imaging (CIM) and serum CA 125 levels, and related to pathological findings in 54 cases or clinical follow-up in 71 cases. Results CIM correctly identified 49 cases with recurrence [sensitivity (SE) 53.3%] ,and there were 27 true negatives [specificity (SP) 81.8%] However, 43 cases were false negative and six were false positive. The positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (ACC) of CIM were 89%, 38.6% and 60.8%, respectively. FDG PET correctly detected recurrent disease in 80/92 cases (SE 86.9%, p < 0.05) and ruled out relapse in 26/33 cases (SP = 78.8%). The PPV, NPV and ACC of PET were 91.9%, 68.4% and 84.8%, respectively. Standardised uptake values did not provide additional diagnostic accuracy compared with visual analysis. The CA 125 results showed an SE of 57.6%, an SP of 93.9% and an ACC of 67.2%. In 23 patients with positive serum CA 125 levels, but negative CIM, FDG PET was positive and relapse was confirmed. Furthermore, FDG PET was positive and relapse was confirmed in 11 patients with negative serum CA 125 levels and CIM. Conclusion FDG PET may detect recurrent ovarian cancer earlier than CIM, with higher sensitivity and even higher diagnostic accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:1396 / 1405
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT J GYNECOL OBSTET
[2]   Cancer control in women. Update 2003 [J].
Boyle, P ;
Leon, ME ;
Maisonneuve, P ;
Autier, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2003, 83 :179-202
[3]   Combined PET/CT for detecting recurrent ovarian cancer limited to retroperitoneal lymph nodes [J].
Bristow, RE ;
Giuntoli, RL ;
Pannu, HK ;
Schulick, RD ;
Fishman, EK ;
Wahl, RL .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 99 (02) :294-300
[4]   Clinically occult recurrent ovarian cancer: patient selection for secondary cytoreductive surgery using combined PET/CT [J].
Bristow, RE ;
del Carmen, MG ;
Pannu, HK ;
Cohade, C ;
Zahurak, ML ;
Fishman, EK ;
Wahl, RL ;
Montz, FJ .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 90 (03) :519-528
[5]   EXPERIENCE WITH POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (PET) SCANS IN PATIENTS WITH OVARIAN-CANCER [J].
CASEY, MJ ;
GUPTA, NC ;
MUTHS, CK .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1994, 53 (03) :331-335
[6]  
Chang WC, 2002, NEOPLASMA, V49, P329
[7]  
Garcia Velloso M J, 2003, Rev Esp Med Nucl, V22, P217
[8]  
GEARY M, 1995, IRAN MED J, V88, P698
[9]  
HAMACHER K, 1990, APPL RADIAT ISOTOPES, V41, P49
[10]   Evaluation of integrated whole-body PET/CT in the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer [J].
Hauth, EAM ;
Antoch, G ;
Stattaus, J ;
Kuehl, H ;
Veit, P ;
Bockisch, A ;
Kimmig, R ;
Forsting, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 56 (02) :263-268