Testing overall and moderator effects in random effects meta-regression

被引:87
作者
Huizenga, Hilde M. [1 ]
Visser, Ingmar [1 ]
Dolan, Conor V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
SMALL SAMPLE INFERENCE; METAANALYSIS; MODEL; HETEROGENEITY; COEFFICIENTS; DISORDERS; POWER;
D O I
10.1348/000711010X522687
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Random effects meta-regression is a technique to synthesize results of multiple studies. It allows for a test of an overall effect, as well as for tests of effects of study characteristics, that is, (discrete or continuous) moderator effects. We describe various procedures to test moderator effects: the z, t, likelihood ratio (LR), Bartlett-corrected LR (BcLR), and resampling tests. We compare the Type I error of these tests, and conclude that the common z test, and to a lesser extent the LR test, do not perform well since they may yield Type I error rates appreciably larger than the chosen alpha. The error rate of the resampling test is accurate, closely followed by the BcLR test. The error rate of the t test is less accurate but arguably tolerable. With respect to statistical power, the BcLR and t tests slightly outperform the resampling test. Therefore, our recommendation is to use either the resampling or the BcLR test. If these statistics are unavailable, then the t test should be used since it is certainly superior to the z test.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Epilepsy in autism is associated with intellectual disability and gender: Evidence from a meta-analysis [J].
Amiet, Claire ;
Gourfinkel-An, Isabelle ;
Bouzamondo, Anissa ;
Tordjman, Sylvie ;
Baulac, Michel ;
Lechat, Philippe ;
Mottron, Laurent ;
Cohen, David .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 64 (07) :577-582
[2]   An empirical comparison of permutation methods for tests of partial regression coefficients in a linear model [J].
Anderson, MJ ;
Legendre, P .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 1999, 62 (03) :271-303
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Applied Regression Analysis
[4]  
BARNDORFFNIELSEN OE, 1988, BIOMETRIKA, V75, P374, DOI 10.2307/2336188
[5]   A RANDOM-EFFECTS REGRESSION-MODEL FOR METAANALYSIS [J].
BERKEY, CS ;
HOAGLIN, DC ;
MOSTELLER, F ;
COLDITZ, GA .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (04) :395-411
[6]   Meta-analysis of raw mean differences [J].
Bond, CF ;
Wiitala, WL ;
Richard, FD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 8 (04) :406-418
[7]  
Browne M.W., 1995, HDB STAT MODELING SO, P185, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4899-1292-3_4, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-1292-3_4]
[8]   A model for integrating fixed-, random-, and mixed-effects meta-analyses into structural equation modeling [J].
Cheung, Mike W. -L. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2008, 13 (03) :182-202
[9]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[10]   Effectiveness of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program on Parenting: A Meta-Analysis [J].
de Graaf, Ireen ;
Speetjens, Paula ;
Smit, Filip ;
de Wolff, Marianne ;
Tavecchio, Louis .
FAMILY RELATIONS, 2008, 57 (05) :553-566