Ecological Suitability of Island Development Based on Ecosystem Services Value, Biocapacity and Ecological Footprint: A Case Study of Pingtan Island, Fujian, China

被引:10
作者
Zheng, Weiheng [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Feng [2 ]
Chen, Shenliang [1 ]
Zhu, Jun [2 ]
Qi, Hongshuai [2 ]
Zhao, Shaohua [2 ]
Liu, Jianhui [2 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, State Key Lab Estuarine & Coastal Res, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources, Inst Oceanog 3, Xiamen 361005, Peoples R China
关键词
LUCC; ecosystem services value; ecological footprint; biocapacity; island development; WATER REQUIREMENTS; IMPACTS; RECLAMATION; ENVIRONMENT; MANAGEMENT; BASIN;
D O I
10.3390/su12062553
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The ecological environment and resource endowment of an island are more vulnerable compared to the mainland, and special assessment and measurement of the ecological suitability for development are significant. Pingtan Island (Fujian, China) was taken as a case study. Changes in ecosystem services value and the profit-and-loss balance between ecological footprint and biocapacity were assessed using land use/cover changes based on remote-sensing images taken in 2009, 2014 and 2017, and the ecological suitability of development was measured. Results show that island development led to a decrease in the ecosystem services value and an increase in ecological footprint and biocapacity. The key ecological factors restricting the scale of island development are topography, vegetation with special functions and freshwater. Biocapacity of islands can increase not only by changing from lower-yield land types to higher-yield construction land types but also by external investment. A new measurement framework was proposed that simply and clearly reveals the ecological suitability of island development and the underlying key constraints.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [21] [方恺 Fang Kai], 2010, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V25, P1013
  • [22] Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making
    Fisher, Brendan
    Turner, R. Kerry
    Morling, Paul
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (03) : 643 - 653
  • [23] Fujian Statistics Bureau, 2019, FUJ STAT YB
  • [24] Fuzhou Statistics Bureau, 2019, FUZHOU STAT YB
  • [25] Hanafiah Marlia M., 2010, Sustainability, V2, P963, DOI 10.3390/su2040963
  • [26] Monitoring 20 years of increased grazing impact on the Greek island of Crete with earth observation satellites
    Hill, J
    Hostert, P
    Tsiourlis, G
    Kasapidis, P
    Udelhoven, T
    Diemer, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 1998, 39 (02) : 165 - 178
  • [27] Three stages in the history of land reclamation in the Netherlands
    Hoeksema, Robert J.
    [J]. IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2007, 56 : S113 - S126
  • [28] Water footprint: methodologies and a case study for assessing the impacts of water use
    Jeswani, Harish Kumar
    Azapagic, Adisa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (12) : 1288 - 1299
  • [29] The Waste Absorption Footprint (WAF): A methodological note on footprint calculations
    Jiao, Wenjun
    Min, Qingwen
    Cheng, Shengkui
    Li, Wenhua
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 34 : 356 - 360
  • [30] Jin M., 2013, J AGR RESOUR ENV, V30, P53