Ecological Suitability of Island Development Based on Ecosystem Services Value, Biocapacity and Ecological Footprint: A Case Study of Pingtan Island, Fujian, China

被引:10
作者
Zheng, Weiheng [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Feng [2 ]
Chen, Shenliang [1 ]
Zhu, Jun [2 ]
Qi, Hongshuai [2 ]
Zhao, Shaohua [2 ]
Liu, Jianhui [2 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, State Key Lab Estuarine & Coastal Res, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources, Inst Oceanog 3, Xiamen 361005, Peoples R China
关键词
LUCC; ecosystem services value; ecological footprint; biocapacity; island development; WATER REQUIREMENTS; IMPACTS; RECLAMATION; ENVIRONMENT; MANAGEMENT; BASIN;
D O I
10.3390/su12062553
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The ecological environment and resource endowment of an island are more vulnerable compared to the mainland, and special assessment and measurement of the ecological suitability for development are significant. Pingtan Island (Fujian, China) was taken as a case study. Changes in ecosystem services value and the profit-and-loss balance between ecological footprint and biocapacity were assessed using land use/cover changes based on remote-sensing images taken in 2009, 2014 and 2017, and the ecological suitability of development was measured. Results show that island development led to a decrease in the ecosystem services value and an increase in ecological footprint and biocapacity. The key ecological factors restricting the scale of island development are topography, vegetation with special functions and freshwater. Biocapacity of islands can increase not only by changing from lower-yield land types to higher-yield construction land types but also by external investment. A new measurement framework was proposed that simply and clearly reveals the ecological suitability of island development and the underlying key constraints.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Struggling with social-ecological mismatches in marine management and conservation at Easter Island
    Aburto, Jaime A.
    Gaymer, Carlos F.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2018, 92 : 21 - 29
  • [2] Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation
    Al-mulali, Usama
    Weng-Wai, Choong
    Sheau-Ting, Low
    Mohammed, Abdul Hakim
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 48 : 315 - 323
  • [3] [Anonymous], AAAI
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING DE
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2003, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being
  • [6] Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Mace, Georgina M.
    Fezzi, Carlo
    Atkinson, Giles
    Turner, Kerry
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 48 (02) : 177 - 218
  • [7] Beyer R. M., 2019, RELOCATING AGR COULD, DOI [10.1101/488841, DOI 10.1101/488841]
  • [8] Analysis of the uncertainty in the monetary valuation of ecosystem services - A case study at the river basin scale
    Boithias, Laurie
    Terrado, Marta
    Corominas, Lluis
    Ziv, Guy
    Kumar, Vikas
    Marques, Montse
    Schuhmacher, Marta
    Acuna, Vicenc
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 543 : 683 - 690
  • [9] Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere's regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts' underlying methodology and framework
    Borucke, Michael
    Moore, David
    Cranston, Gemma
    Gracey, Kyle
    Iha, Katsunori
    Larson, Joy
    Lazarus, Elias
    Morales, Juan Carlos
    Wackernagel, Mathis
    Galli, Alessandro
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 24 : 518 - 533
  • [10] Brundtland G., 1987, Our common future