Aerosol Generation and Mitigation During Methacholine Bronchoprovocation Testing: Infection Control Implications in the Era of COVID-19

被引:6
作者
Subat, Yosuf W. [1 ]
Hainy, Matthew E. [2 ]
Torgerud, Keith D. [3 ]
Sajgalik, Pavol [4 ]
Guntupalli, Siva Kamal [1 ]
Johnson, Bruce D. [4 ]
Chul-Ho, Kim [4 ]
Lim, Kaiser G. [1 ]
Helgeson, Scott A. [5 ]
Scanlon, Paul D. [1 ]
Niven, Alexander S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Engn, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Resp Care & Cardiopulm Diagnost, La Crosse, WI USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiol, Human Integrat & Environm Physiol Lab, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
Methacholine; Aerosol; Droplet; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Infection Control; Asthma; NEBULIZER OUTPUT; CHALLENGE; INHALATION; DOSIMETER; DELIVERY; ASTHMA;
D O I
10.4187/respcare.09236
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Methacholine bronchoprovocation or challenge testing (MCT) is commonly performed to assess airway hyper-responsiveness in the setting of suspected asthma. Nebulization is an aerosol-generating procedure, but little is known about the risks of MCT in the context of the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COV1D-19) pandemic. We aimed to quantify and characterize aerosol generMien during MCT by using different delivery methods and to assess the impact of adding a viral filter. METHODS: Seven healthy subjects performed simulated MCT in a near particle-free laboratory space with 4 different nehulizers and with a dosimeter. Two devices continuously sampled the ambient air during the procedure, which detected ultrafine particles, from 0.02-1 mu m, and particles of sizes 03, 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, and 10 mu m, respectively. Particle generation was compared among all the devices, with and without viral filter placement. RESULTS: Ultrafine-particle generation during simulated MCT was significant across all the devices. Ultrafine-particle (0.02-1 mu m) concentrations decreased 77%-91% with the addition of a viral filter and varied significantly between unfiltered (P < .001) and filtered devices (P < .001). Ultrafine-particle generation was lowest when using the dosimeter with filtered Hudson nebulizer (1,258 +/- 1,644 particle/mL). Ultrafine-particle concentrations with the filtered nebulizer devices using a compressor were higher than particle concentrations detected when using the dosimeter: Monaghan (3,472 +/- 1,794 particles/mL), PARI (4,403 +/- 2,948), Hudson (6,320 +/- 1,787) and AirLife (9,523 +/- 5,098). CONCLUSIONS: The high particle concentrations generated during MCT pose significant infection control concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic. Particle generation during MCT was significantly reduced by using breath-actuated delivery and a viral filter, which offers an effective mitigation strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:1858 / 1865
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysis of Surgery Residency Website Content: Implications during the COVID-19 Era
    Lambdin, Jacob
    Lin, Ryan P.
    DeAngelis, Erik J.
    Vaziri, Khashayar
    Lin, Paul
    Lee, Juliet
    Jackson, Hope T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 79 (04) : 904 - 908
  • [32] Infection Control in Dental Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Amato, Alessandra
    Caggiano, Mario
    Amato, Massimo
    Moccia, Giuseppina
    Capunzo, Mario
    De Caro, Francesco
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (13) : 1 - 12
  • [33] Trends in cholesterol testing during the COVID-19 pandemic COVID-19 and cholesterol testing
    Gumuser, Esra D.
    Haidermota, Sara
    Finneran, Phoebe
    Natarajan, Pradeep
    Honigberg, Michael C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 6
  • [34] A regional approach for infection prevention in death investigations during the COVID-19 era
    Nakamura, Mami
    Tojo, Misa
    Takaso, Marin
    Hitosugi, Masahito
    [J]. LEGAL MEDICINE, 2021, 48
  • [35] Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology during COVID-19 and in the post COVID-19 era
    Hallak, Joelle A.
    Scanzera, Angelica C.
    Azar, Dimitri T.
    Chan, R. V. Paul
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 31 (05) : 447 - 453
  • [36] Diagnostic bias during the COVID-19 era: COVID-19 or renal abscess?
    Amato, Marco
    Eissa, Ahmed
    Rosiello, Giuseppe
    Farinha, Rui
    Piazza, Pietro
    Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Bianchi, Giampaolo
    Micali, Salvatore
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Puliatti, Stefano
    [J]. UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2021, 88 (03) : 218 - 222
  • [37] Testing the Obligations of Presence in Academia in the COVID-19 Era
    Shelley-Egan, Clare
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (16)
  • [38] Implications of COVID-19 Pandemic on Solid Waste Generation during Movement Control Order in Peninsular Malaysia
    Kasavan, Saraswathy
    Ali, Nurul Izzati Mohd
    Ali, Sharif Shofirun Sharif
    Yusoff, Sumiani
    Siron, Rusinah
    [J]. AKADEMIKA, 2022, 92 (01) : 179 - 194
  • [39] Overview of COVID-19 testing and implications for otolaryngologists
    Vinh, Daniel B.
    Zhao, Xiao
    Kiong, Kimberley L.
    Guo, Theresa
    Jozaghi, Yelda
    Yao, Chris
    Kelley, James M.
    Hanna, Ehab
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2020, 42 (07): : 1629 - 1633
  • [40] Pediatric asthma control in tertiary care setting using telemedicine during COVID-19 era
    Sitthikarnkha, Phanthila
    Uppala, Rattapon
    Mairiang, Dara
    Suebsarakam, Porntipa
    Sirikarn, Prapassara
    Techasatian, Leelawadee
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL PEDIATRICS, 2022, 11 (12) : 1892 - 1898