Aerosol Generation and Mitigation During Methacholine Bronchoprovocation Testing: Infection Control Implications in the Era of COVID-19

被引:6
|
作者
Subat, Yosuf W. [1 ]
Hainy, Matthew E. [2 ]
Torgerud, Keith D. [3 ]
Sajgalik, Pavol [4 ]
Guntupalli, Siva Kamal [1 ]
Johnson, Bruce D. [4 ]
Chul-Ho, Kim [4 ]
Lim, Kaiser G. [1 ]
Helgeson, Scott A. [5 ]
Scanlon, Paul D. [1 ]
Niven, Alexander S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Engn, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Resp Care & Cardiopulm Diagnost, La Crosse, WI USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiol, Human Integrat & Environm Physiol Lab, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
Methacholine; Aerosol; Droplet; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Infection Control; Asthma; NEBULIZER OUTPUT; CHALLENGE; INHALATION; DOSIMETER; DELIVERY; ASTHMA;
D O I
10.4187/respcare.09236
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Methacholine bronchoprovocation or challenge testing (MCT) is commonly performed to assess airway hyper-responsiveness in the setting of suspected asthma. Nebulization is an aerosol-generating procedure, but little is known about the risks of MCT in the context of the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COV1D-19) pandemic. We aimed to quantify and characterize aerosol generMien during MCT by using different delivery methods and to assess the impact of adding a viral filter. METHODS: Seven healthy subjects performed simulated MCT in a near particle-free laboratory space with 4 different nehulizers and with a dosimeter. Two devices continuously sampled the ambient air during the procedure, which detected ultrafine particles, from 0.02-1 mu m, and particles of sizes 03, 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, and 10 mu m, respectively. Particle generation was compared among all the devices, with and without viral filter placement. RESULTS: Ultrafine-particle generation during simulated MCT was significant across all the devices. Ultrafine-particle (0.02-1 mu m) concentrations decreased 77%-91% with the addition of a viral filter and varied significantly between unfiltered (P < .001) and filtered devices (P < .001). Ultrafine-particle generation was lowest when using the dosimeter with filtered Hudson nebulizer (1,258 +/- 1,644 particle/mL). Ultrafine-particle concentrations with the filtered nebulizer devices using a compressor were higher than particle concentrations detected when using the dosimeter: Monaghan (3,472 +/- 1,794 particles/mL), PARI (4,403 +/- 2,948), Hudson (6,320 +/- 1,787) and AirLife (9,523 +/- 5,098). CONCLUSIONS: The high particle concentrations generated during MCT pose significant infection control concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic. Particle generation during MCT was significantly reduced by using breath-actuated delivery and a viral filter, which offers an effective mitigation strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:1858 / 1865
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aerosol Generation During Methacholine Challenge Testing: Clinical Implications During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Subat, Y.
    Sajgalik, P.
    Hainy, M.
    Torgerud, K.
    Guntupalli, S.
    Helgeson, S.
    Johnston, J.
    Scanlon, P. D.
    Johnson, B. D.
    Niven, A. S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 203 (09)
  • [2] Aerosol Generation During Peak Flow Testing: Clinical Implications for COVID-19
    Subat, Yosuf W.
    Guntupalli, Siva Kamal
    Sajgalik, Pavol
    Hainy, Matthew E.
    Torgerud, Keith D.
    Helgeson, Scott A.
    Johnson, Bruce D.
    Allison, Thomas G.
    Lim, Kaiser G.
    Niven, Alexander S.
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2021, 66 (08) : 1291 - 1298
  • [3] Aerosol Generation During Peak Flow Testing: Clinical Implications During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Subat, Y.
    Guntupalli, S.
    Sajgalik, P.
    Hainy, M.
    Johnson, B. D.
    Helgeson, S.
    Niven, A. S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 203 (09)
  • [4] Aerosol Generation During Myringotomy With Tympanostomy Tube Insertion: Implications for Otolaryngology in the COVID-19 Era
    Campiti, Vincent J.
    Ye, Michael J.
    Sharma, Dhruv
    Matt, Bruce H.
    Mitchell, Ryan M.
    Ting, Jonathan Y.
    Illing, Elisa A.
    Park, Jae Hong
    Burgin, Sarah J.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2021, 165 (04) : 532 - 535
  • [5] Reducing visible aerosol generation during phacoemulsification in the era of Covid-19
    Kieren Darcy
    Omar Elhaddad
    Asaf Achiron
    Johannes Keller
    Duncan Leadbetter
    Derek Tole
    Sidath Liyanage
    Eye, 2021, 35 : 1405 - 1410
  • [6] Reducing visible aerosol generation during phacoemulsification in the era of Covid-19
    Darcy, Kieren
    Elhaddad, Omar
    Achiron, Asaf
    Keller, Johannes
    Leadbetter, Duncan
    Tole, Derek
    Liyanage, Sidath
    EYE, 2021, 35 (05) : 1405 - 1410
  • [7] Assessing visible aerosol generation during vitrectomy in the era of Covid-19
    Sidath Liyanage
    Pathma Ramasamy
    Omar Elhaddad
    Kieren Darcy
    Andrew Hudson
    Johannes Keller
    Eye, 2021, 35 : 1187 - 1190
  • [8] Assessing visible aerosol generation during vitrectomy in the era of Covid-19
    Liyanage, Sidath
    Ramasamy, Pathma
    Elhaddad, Omar
    Darcy, Kieren
    Hudson, Andrew
    Keller, Johannes
    EYE, 2021, 35 (04) : 1187 - 1190
  • [9] Demonstration and Mitigation of Aerosol and Particle Dispersion During Mastoidectomy Relevant to the COVID-19 Era
    Chen, Jenny X.
    Workman, Alan D.
    Chari, Divya A.
    Jung, David H.
    Kozin, Elliott
    Lee, Daniel J.
    Welling, D. Bradley
    Bleier, Benjamin S.
    Quesnel, Alicia M.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2020, 41 (09) : 1230 - 1239
  • [10] Aerosol generation and droplet spread during nasogastric intubation in the COVID-19 era
    Verbeure, Wout
    Geeraerts, Annelies
    Huang, I-Hsuan
    Timmermans, Lien
    Toth, Joran
    Geysen, Hannelore
    Cools, Louise
    Carbone, Florencia
    Schol, Jolien
    Devriese, Herman
    Haesaerts, Rico
    Mori, Hideki
    Vanuytsel, Tim
    Tack, Jan
    GUT, 2021, 70 (10) : 2017 - +