Transabdominal open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is associated with higher rates of late reintervention and readmission compared with the retroperitoneal approach

被引:18
作者
Deery, Sarah E. [1 ,2 ]
Zettervall, Sara L. [1 ]
O'Donnell, Thomas F. X. [1 ,2 ]
Goodney, Philip P. [3 ]
Weaver, Fred A. [4 ]
Teixeira, Pedro G. [5 ]
Patel, Virendra I. [6 ]
Schermerhorn, Marc L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Div Vasc Surg & Endovasc Therapy, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[5] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Surg & Perioperat Care, Dell Med Sch, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[6] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Div Vasc Surg & Endovasc Intervent, New York, NY USA
关键词
Aortic aneurysm; Retroperitoneal; Laparotomy; Reintervention; Readmission; TRANSPERITONEAL; SURGERY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2019.03.045
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Limited data exist comparing the transabdominal and retroperitoneal approaches to open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, especially late mortality and laparotomy-related reinterventions and readmissions. Therefore, we compared long-term rates of mortality, reintervention, and readmission after open AAA repair through a transabdominal compared with a retroperitoneal approach. Methods: We identified all patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) undergoing open AAA repair from 2003 to 2015. Patients with rupture or supraceliac clamp were excluded. We used the VQI linkage to Medicare to ascertain rates of long-term outcomes, including rates of AAA-related and laparotomy-related (ie, hernia, bowel obstruction) reinterventions and readmissions. We used multivariable Cox regression to account for differences in comorbidities, aneurysm details, and operative characteristics. Results: We identified 1282 patients in the VQI with linkage to Medicare data, 914 (71%) who underwent a transperitoneal approach and 368 (29%) who underwent a retroperitoneal approach. Patients who underwent a retroperitoneal approach were slightly more likely to have preoperative renal insufficiency but were otherwise similar in terms of demographics and comorbidities. They more often had a clamp above at least one renal artery (61% vs 36%; P <.001) and underwent concomitant renal revascularization (9.5% vs 4.3%; P <.001). Patients who underwent a transabdominal approach more often presented with symptoms (14% vs 9.0%; P <.01) and had a femoral distal anastomosis (15% vs 7.1%; P <.001). There was no difference in 5-year survival (62% vs 61%; log-rank, P = .51). However, patients who underwent a transabdominal approach experienced higher rates of repair-related reinterventions and readmissions (5-year: 42% vs 34%; log-rank, P <.01), even after adjustment for demographic and operative differences (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.9; P <.01). Conclusions: A transabdominal exposure for AAA repair is associated with higher rates of late reintervention and readmission than with the retroperitoneal approach, which should be considered when possible in operative decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Risk of Late-Onset Adhesions and Incisional Hernia Repairs after Surgery [J].
Bensley, Rodney P. ;
Schermerhorn, Marc L. ;
Hurks, Rob ;
Sachs, Teviah ;
Boyd, Christopher A. ;
O'Malley, A. James ;
Cotterill, Philip ;
Landon, Bruce E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 216 (06) :1159-+
[2]   Retroperitoneal Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Offers Postoperative Benefits to Male Patients in the Veterans Affairs Health System [J].
Borkon, Matthew J. ;
Zaydfudim, Victor ;
Carey, Christopher D. ;
Brophy, Colleen M. ;
Guzman, Raul J. ;
Dattilo, Jeffery B. .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 24 (06) :728-732
[3]   Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the targeted vascular National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [J].
Buck, Dominique B. ;
Ultee, Klaas H. J. ;
Zettervall, Sara L. ;
Soden, Pete A. ;
Darling, Jeremy ;
Wyers, Mark ;
van Herwaarden, Joost A. ;
Schermerhorn, Marc L. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 64 (03) :585-591
[4]   Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression [J].
Bursac, Zoran ;
Gauss, C. Heath ;
Williams, David Keith ;
Hosmer, David W. .
SOURCE CODE FOR BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2008, 3 (01)
[5]   TRANSPERITONEAL VERSUS RETROPERITONEAL APPROACH FOR AORTIC RECONSTRUCTION - A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
CAMBRIA, RP ;
BREWSTER, DC ;
ABBOTT, WM ;
FREEHAN, M ;
MEGERMAN, J ;
LAMURAGLIA, G ;
WILSON, R ;
WILSON, D ;
TEPLICK, R ;
DAVISON, JK .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1990, 11 (02) :314-325
[6]   SVS practice guidelines for the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Executive summary [J].
Chaikof, Elliot L. ;
Brewster, David C. ;
Dalman, Ronald L. ;
Makaroun, Michel S. ;
Illig, Karl A. ;
Sicard, Gregorio A. ;
Timaran, Carlos H. ;
Upchurch, Gilbert R., Jr. ;
Veith, Frank J. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 (04) :880-896
[7]  
DARLING RC, 1992, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V33, P65
[8]   Racial disparities in outcomes after intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Deery, Sarah E. ;
O'Donnell, Thomas F. X. ;
Shean, Katie E. ;
Darling, Jeremy D. ;
Soden, Peter A. ;
Hughes, Kakra ;
Wang, Grace J. ;
Schermerhorn, Marc L. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 67 (04) :1059-1067
[9]   Open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries [J].
Deery, Sarah E. ;
Schermerhorn, Marc L. .
SURGERY, 2017, 162 (04) :721-731
[10]   Progressive shortfall in open aneurysm experience for vascular surgery trainees with the impact of fenestrated and branched endovascular technology [J].
Dua, Anahita ;
Koprowski, Steven ;
Upchurch, Gilbert ;
Lee, Cheong J. ;
Desai, Sapan S. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (01) :257-261