Optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure during nasal continuous airway pressure for severe bronchiolitis: a prospective study

被引:2
|
作者
Yin, Lijuan [1 ]
Li, Linwei [2 ]
Peng, Donghong [1 ]
Chen, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Childrens Hosp,Chongqing Key Lab Pediat, Dept Resp Med,Key Lab Child Dev & Disorders,China, Natl Clin Res Ctr Child Hlth & Disorders,Minist E, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangjin Cent Hosp Chongqing, Dept Pediat, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
Severe bronchiolitis; nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP); positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP); pediatrics; EXHALED NITRIC-OXIDE; PULMONARY-FUNCTION; INFANTS;
D O I
10.21037/tp-21-205
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) has been increasingly applied in the pediatric setting. However, there is no uniform standard for setting and titrating positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level, which is paramount to the effectiveness of the treatment. This study aimed to investigate the optimal parameters for nCPAP in the treatment of severe bronchiolitis based on clinical efficacy and pulmonary function parameters. Methods: A before-after prospective study was conducted with a total of 152 study subjects. These 152 hospitalized patients with severe bronchiolitis were treated and observed from December 2018 to February 2019. Comparisons were made between subjects for clinical symptoms, oxygenation improvement, correction of CO2 retention, degree of airway obstruction and respiratory mechanics improvement between three different positive end-expiratory pressure levels (PEEP). Results: nCPAP could effectively improve the clinical manifestations, blood gas analysis, pulmonary function and respiratory muscle energy consumption. The m-WCAS score, PaCO2, TPTEF/TE, VPEF/VE, respiratory system compliance (Crs) and resistance (Rrs) were significantly different at different PEEP levels (P<0.05). Although there were no hemodynamic changes at peep parameter levels in the three groups. Group 2 (PEEP: 6 cmH(2)O) had optimal clinical effects, and improvement in airway obstruction and respiratory mechanics compared with the group 1 (PEEP: 4 cmH(2)O) and the group 3 (PEEP: 7 cmH(2)O). Conclusions: PEEP of 6 cmH(2)O via nCPAP is considered as the optimal level in the treatment of infants with severe bronchiolitis.
引用
收藏
页码:1843 / 1850
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal level of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in severe viral bronchiolitis
    Sandrine Essouri
    Philippe Durand
    Laurent Chevret
    Laurent Balu
    Denis Devictor
    Brigitte Fauroux
    Pierre Tissières
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2011, 37 : 2002 - 2007
  • [2] Optimal level of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in severe viral bronchiolitis
    Essouri, Sandrine
    Durand, Philippe
    Chevret, Laurent
    Balu, Laurent
    Devictor, Denis
    Fauroux, Brigitte
    Tissieres, Pierre
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 37 (12) : 2002 - 2007
  • [3] POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY AIRWAY PRESSURE IN SEVERE ARTERIAL HYPOXEMIA
    MCMAHON, SM
    HALPRIN, GM
    SIEKER, HO
    AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1973, 108 (03): : 526 - 535
  • [4] THE EFFECT OF CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE VERSUS POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE ON THE DIAPHRAGM
    ROAD, JD
    LEEVERS, AM
    GRASSINO, A
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 1991, 6 (03) : 136 - 142
  • [5] PROXIMAL SYSTEM FOR POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE (PEEP) AND CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE (CPAP)
    DUPUIS, YG
    VERGILIO, GC
    SPOEREL, WE
    CANADIAN ANAESTHETISTS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 1979, 26 (04) : 331 - 334
  • [6] NASAL CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE IN BRONCHIOLITIS
    BEASLEY, JM
    JONES, SEF
    ANAESTHESIA, 1982, 37 (03) : 381 - 381
  • [7] Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Bronchiolitis
    Chetan, Chinmay
    Basu, Srikanta
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2018, 55 (05) : 438 - 438
  • [8] Positive end-expiratory pressure or no positive end-expiratory pressure: is that the question to be asked?
    Villar, J
    CRITICAL CARE, 2003, 7 (02): : 192 - 192
  • [9] Positive end-expiratory pressure or no positive end-expiratory pressure: is that the question to be asked?
    Jesús Villar
    Critical Care, 7
  • [10] CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE (CPAP) AND NASAL POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION (NPPV) FOR SEVERE BRONCHIOLITIS
    Borgi, A.
    Louati, A.
    Kbeir, S.
    Miraoui, A.
    Ayari, A.
    Hajji, A.
    Bouziri, A.
    Menif, K.
    Benjaballah, N.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (11)