Laparoscopic suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse

被引:106
作者
Maher, CF [1 ]
Carey, MP [1 ]
Murray, CJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Womens & Mercy Hosp, Urogynaecol Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01376-X
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Vaginal hysterectomy remains the accepted surgical treatment for women with uterine prolapse. The Manchester repair is favored in women wishing uterine preservation. Vaginal hysterectomy alone fails to address the pathologic cause of the uterine prolapse. The Manchester repair has a high failure rate and may cause difficulty sampling the cervix and uterus in the future. The laparoscopic suture hysteropexy offers physiologic repair of uterine prolapse. Method: At the laparoscopic suture hysteropexy, the pouch of Douglas is closed and the uterosacral ligaments are plicated and reattached to the cervix. Results: Forty-three women with symptomatic uterine prolapse were prospectively evaluated and underwent laparoscopic suture hysteropexy with a mean follow-up of 12 +/- 7 months (range 6-32). The mean operating time for the laparoscopic suture hysteropexy alone was 42 +/- 15 minutes (range 22-121), and the mean blood loss was less than 50 mL. On review, 35 women (81%) had no symptoms of prolapse and 34 (79%) had no objective evidence of uterine prolapse. Two women subsequently completed term pregnancies and were without prolapse. Both underwent elective cesarean delivery. Conclusion: The laparoscopic suture hysteropexy is effective and safe in the management of symptomatic uterine prolapse. The result is physiologically correct, without disfiguring the cervix. This may be an appropriate procedure for women with uterine prolapse wishing uterine preservation. (Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:1010-14. (C) 2001 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).
引用
收藏
页码:1010 / 1014
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Baden W F, 1972, Clin Obstet Gynecol, V15, P1048, DOI 10.1097/00003081-197212000-00020
[2]   The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in the management of menorrhagia [J].
Barrington, JW ;
BowenSimpkins, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 104 (05) :614-616
[3]  
Bonney V, 1934, J OBSTET GYNECOL BR, V41, P669, DOI [10.1111/j.1471-0528.1934.tb08799.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1934.TB08799.X]
[4]   Colposacropexy with Gore-tex mesh in marked vaginal and uterovaginal prolapse [J].
Costantini, E ;
Lombi, R ;
Micheli, C ;
Parziani, S ;
Porena, M .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1998, 34 (02) :111-117
[5]   SACROSPINOUS FIXATION - SHOULD THIS BE PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY [J].
CRUIKSHANK, SH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 164 (04) :1072-1076
[6]  
Marana HRC, 1999, J REPROD MED, V44, P529
[7]   Laparoscopic management of pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Margossian, H ;
Walters, MD ;
Falcone, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1999, 85 (01) :57-62
[8]  
MASTERS WH, 1966, HUM SEX RESPONSE, P238
[9]   EXTENDED MANCHESTER OPERATION - A REVIEW OF 289 CASES [J].
OLEARY, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1970, 107 (04) :546-&
[10]   Apical vault repair, the cornerstone or pelvic vault reconstruction [J].
Ross J.W. .
International Urogynecology Journal, 1997, 8 (3) :146-152