Yield potential of modern soybean cultivars under high and low input levels

被引:0
作者
Tonatto, Matheus [1 ]
Zdziarski, Andrei Daniel [2 ]
Meira, Daniela [1 ]
Panho, Maiara Cecilia [1 ]
Zanella, Rodrigo [1 ]
Menegazzi, Caroline Patricia [1 ]
Colonelli, Lucas Leite [1 ]
Tolentino Fernandes, Roge Afonso [1 ]
Campagnolli, Otavio Ramos [1 ]
Benin, Giovani [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tecnol Fed Parana, Campus Pato Branco,Via Conhecimento,Km 1, BR-85503390 Pato Branco, PR, Brazil
[2] GDM Seeds, 454E 300N Rd, Gibson City, IL USA
关键词
Glycine max; grain yield; high performance management; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2022.v57.02852
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The objective of this work was to evaluate the grain yield potential of modern soybean (Glycine max) cultivars subjected to high- and low-input management levels on different sowing dates, in the southwestern region of the state of Parana, Brazil. The experiment was carried out in the 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 crop seasons in the municipality of Itapejara D'Oeste. Five soybean cultivars (BMX Zeus IPRO, BMX Ativa RR, BMX Lanca IPRO, NS 5445 IPRO, and NA 5909 RG) were evaluated in four environments formed by the combination of input management levels (high and low) and sowing dates (first and second). The experimental design was a randomized complete block with three replicates. The evaluated traits were: grain yield potential (kg ha(-1)), in the R5 phenological stage; and grain yield (kg ha(-1)) and its components, in the R8 stage. Cultivar, sowing date, and input management are determinant for maximizing grain yield potential. In the first sowing date, in October, the BMX Zeus IPRO cultivar shows a better response to the high level management, with a higher yield potential in the R5 stage (19,682 kg ha(-1)) and a higher grain yield (8,248 kg ha(-1)), whereas NA 5909 RG shows the best results with the low input management.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] Yield gap of the double-crop system of main-season soybean with off-season maize in Brazil
    Noia Junior, Rogerio de Souza
    Sentelhas, Paulo Cesar
    [J]. CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 2020, 71 (05) : 445 - 458
  • [22] High-Input Management Systems Effect on Soybean Seed Yield, Yield Components, and Economic Break-Even Probabilities
    Orlowski, John M.
    Haverkamp, Bryson J.
    Laurenz, Randall G.
    Marburger, David. A.
    Wilson, Eric W.
    Casteel, Shaun N.
    Conley, Shawn P.
    Naeve, Seth L.
    Nafziger, Emerson D.
    Roozeboom, Kraig L.
    Ross, William J.
    Thelen, Kurt D.
    Lee, Chad D.
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (04) : 1988 - 2004
  • [23] Soft Red and White Winter Wheat Response to Input-Intensive Management
    Quinn, D.
    Steinke, K.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2019, 111 (01) : 428 - 439
  • [24] R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM, 2019, R: a language and environ- ment for statistical computing
  • [25] Rambo Lisandro, 2004, Cienc. Rural, V34, P33, DOI 10.1590/S0103-84782004000100006
  • [26] Integrated Management of Important Soybean Pathogens of the United States in Changing Climate
    Roth, Mitchell G.
    Webster, Richard W.
    Mueller, Daren S.
    Chilvers, Martin I.
    Faske, Travis R.
    Mathew, Febina M.
    Bradley, Carl A.
    Damicone, John P.
    Kabbage, Mehdi
    Smith, Damon L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [27] SANTOS H.G., 2018, SISTEMA BRASILEIRO C
  • [28] Assessment of agricultural efficiency and yield gap for soybean in the Brazilian Central Cerrado biome
    Santos, Thaynara Garcia
    Battisti, Rafael
    Casaroli, Derblai
    Alves Jr, Jose
    Pego Evangelista, Adao Wagner
    [J]. BRAGANTIA, 2021, 80
  • [29] SIMEPAR, SIST TECN MON AMB PA
  • [30] USDA. United States Department of Agriculture, 2022, USDA CIRC SER WAP, V2