Quantifying the relative impact of hydrological and hydraulic modelling parameterizations on uncertainty of inundation maps

被引:35
作者
Annis, A. [1 ]
Nardi, F. [1 ,2 ]
Volpi, E. [3 ]
Fiori, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Foreigners Perugia, WARREDOC, Perugia, Italy
[2] Florida Int Univ, Inst Water & Environm, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Univ Roma Tre, Dept Engn, Rome, Italy
来源
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES | 2020年 / 65卷 / 04期
关键词
Flood mapping; uncertainty; hydrologic modelling; hydraulic modelling; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS; FLOOD; RAINFALL; INFORMATION; FRAMEWORK; RIVER;
D O I
10.1080/02626667.2019.1709640
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Flood risk management strongly relies on inundation models for river basin zoning in flood-prone and risk-free areas. Floodplain zoning is significantly affected by the diverse and concurrent uncertainties that characterize the modelling chain used for producing inundation maps. In order to quantify the relative impact of the uncertainties linked to a lumped hydrological (rainfall-runoff) model and a FLO-2D hydraulic model, a Monte Carlo procedure is proposed in this work. The hydrological uncertainty is associated with the design rainfall estimation method, while the hydraulic model uncertainty is associated with roughness parameterization. This uncertainty analysis is tested on the case study of the Marta coastal catchment in Italy, by comparing the different frequency, extent and depth of inundation simulations associated with varying rainfall forcing and/or hydraulic model roughness realizations. The results suggest a significant predominance of the hydrological uncertainty with respect to the hydraulic one on the overall uncertainty associated with the simulated inundation maps.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 523
页数:17
相关论文
共 59 条
[31]  
Mesa O.J., 1986, Scale Problems in Hydrology, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-4678-11
[32]  
Moghadasi N., 2018, NATURAL HAZARDS RISK
[33]   Flood hazard assessment of Atrato River in Colombia [J].
Mosquera-Machado, S. ;
Ahmad, Sajjad .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2007, 21 (03) :591-609
[34]   Efficient incorporation of channel cross-section geometry uncertainty into regional and global scale flood inundation models [J].
Neal, Jeffrey C. ;
Odoni, Nicholas A. ;
Trigg, Mark A. ;
Freer, Jim E. ;
Garcia-Pintado, Javier ;
Mason, David C. ;
Wood, Melissa ;
Bates, Paul D. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 529 :169-183
[35]  
OBrien J. S., 2018, FLO-2D Reference manual, version 2018
[36]   2-DIMENSIONAL WATER FLOOD AND MUDFLOW SIMULATION [J].
OBRIEN, JS ;
JULIEN, PY ;
FULLERTON, WT .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1993, 119 (02) :244-261
[37]  
Papaioannou G., 2017, Advances in Geosciences, V44, P23, DOI [10.5194/adgeo-44-23-2017, DOI 10.5194/ADGEO-44-23-2017]
[38]   Ignorance is bliss: Or seven reasons not to use uncertainty analysis [J].
Pappenberger, F. ;
Beven, K. J. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2006, 42 (05)
[39]   Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations [J].
Pappenberger, F ;
Beven, K ;
Horritt, M ;
Blazkova, S .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2005, 302 (1-4) :46-69
[40]   Influence of uncertain boundary conditions and model structure on flood inundation predictions [J].
Pappenberger, Florian ;
Matgen, Patrick ;
Beven, Keith J. ;
Henry, Jean-Baptiste ;
Pfister, Laurent ;
de, Paul Fraipont .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2006, 29 (10) :1430-1449