Teacher Perceptions and Preferences for 5 School Breakfast Program Models

被引:9
作者
Krueger, Emily B. [1 ]
Eggett, Dennis L. [1 ]
Stokes, Nathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Nutr Dietet & Food Sci, S-235 Eyring Sci Ctr, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
Breakfast in the Classroom; children; School Breakfast Program; teachers; ADOLESCENTS; OBESITY; PARTICIPATION; CONSUMPTION; NUTRIENT; CHILDREN; BELIEFS; HEALTH; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneb.2018.01.006
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objective: Identify differences in teacher perceptions of benefits, challenges, and preferences to different School Breakfast Program (SBP) service models. Design: A cross-sectional study design was used and an electronic survey was distributed to teachers throughout the state of Utah. Setting: Kindergarten through 12th-grade schools throughout Utah. Participants: A convenience sample of 369 kindergarten through 12th-grade teachers in Utah. Variables Measured: Demographics, benefits and challenges, and teacher preference for SBP models in Utah. Analysis: Frequencies and multiple comparison analysis tests were performed. A level of significance of <.001 was chosen to protect for multiple comparisons. Results: Traditional breakfast was the most preferred model, with a mean score of 2.8; Breakfast in the Classroom was the least preferred model by teachers, with a mean of -1.3 (scale used = -5 to 0 to 5). Children not going hungry was the greatest benefit (95.4%; n = 352) to SBP and food waste was the greatest challenge (45.8%; n = 168). Conclusions and Implications: Teachers prefer traditional SBP model over BIC and other nontraditional models. Increased awareness and education regarding benefits and challenges of SBP models may increase teacher preference for nontraditional SBP models, especially BIC.
引用
收藏
页码:788 / 794
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, FED REGISTER, V77, P1
  • [3] Understanding Perceptions of School Administrators Related to School Breakfast in a Low School Breakfast Participation State
    Askelson, Natoshia M.
    Golembiewski, Elizabeth H.
    Bobst, Ann
    Delger, Patti J.
    Scheidel, Carrie A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2017, 87 (06) : 427 - 434
  • [4] Exploring the Parents' Attitudes and Perceptions About School Breakfast to Understand Why Participation Is Low in a Rural Midwest State
    Askelson, Natoshia M.
    Golembiewski, Elizabeth H.
    Ghattas, Andrew
    Williams, Steven
    Delger, Patti J.
    Scheidel, Carrie A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR, 2017, 49 (02) : 107 - +
  • [5] Consumption of Low-Nutrient, Energy-Dense Foods and Beverages at School, Home, and Other Locations among School Lunch Participants and Nonparticipants
    Briefel, Ronette R.
    Wilson, Ander
    Gleason, Philip M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2009, 109 (02) : S79 - S90
  • [6] Center for Disease Control, CHILDH OV OB
  • [7] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011, CHILD OB FACTS PREV
  • [8] Conklin M. T., 2003, Topics in Clinical Nutrition, V18, P192
  • [9] Review and analysis of evaluation measures used in nutrition education intervention research
    Contento, IR
    Randell, JS
    Basch, CE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR, 2002, 34 (01) : 2 - 25
  • [10] The Relationship of Breakfast Skipping and Type of Breakfast Consumption with Nutrient Intake and Weight Status in Children and Adolescents: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2006
    Deshmukh-Taskar, Priya R.
    Nicklas, Theresa A.
    O'Neil, Carol E.
    Keast, Debra R.
    Radcliffe, John D.
    Cho, Susan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2010, 110 (06) : 869 - 878