Why do papers from international collaborations get more citations? A bibliometric analysis of Library and Information Science papers

被引:33
作者
Velez-Estevez, A. [1 ]
Garcia-Sanchez, P. [2 ]
Moral-Munoz, J. A. [3 ]
Cobo, M. J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cadiz, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Cadiz 11519, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Dept Comp Architecture & Technol, Granada 18071, Spain
[3] Univ Cadiz, Dept Nursing & Physiotherapy, Cadiz 11009, Spain
[4] Univ Granada, Andalusian Res Inst Data Sci & Computat Intellige, Dept Comp Sci & Artificial Intelligence, Granada 18071, Spain
关键词
International research collaboration; Impact analysis; Science mapping analysis; Coword analysis; Library and Information Science; HIGHLY CITED PAPERS; CO-WORD ANALYSIS; IMPACT; NETWORK; COAUTHORSHIP; PUBLICATIONS; AUTHORS;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-022-04486-4
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Scientific activity has become increasingly complex in recent years. The need for international research collaboration has thus become a common pattern in science. In this current landscape, countries face the problem of maintaining their competitiveness while cooperating with other countries to achieve relevant research outputs. In this international context, publications from international collaborations tend to achieve greater scientific impact than those from domestic ones. To design policies that improve the competitiveness of countries and organizations, it thus becomes necessary to understand the factors and mechanisms that influence the benefits and impact of international research. In this regard, the aim of this study is to confirm whether the differences in impact between international and domestic collaborations are affected by their topics and structure. To perform this study, we examined the Library and Information Science category of the Web of Science database between 2015 and 2019. A science mapping analysis approach was used to extract the themes and their structure according to collaboration type and in the whole category (2015-2019). We also looked for differences in these thematic aspects in top countries and in communities of collaborating countries. The results showed that the thematic factor influences the impact of international research, as the themes in this type of collaboration lie at the forefront of the Library and Information Science category (e.g., technologies such as artificial intelligence and social media are found in the category), while domestic collaborations have focused on more well-consolidated themes (e.g., academic libraries and bibliometrics). Organizations, countries, and communities of countries must therefore consider this thematic factor when designing strategies to improve their competitiveness and collaborate.
引用
收藏
页码:7517 / 7555
页数:39
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Abderrahmane A., 2021, Our Regions
[2]   The rise of research networks [J].
Adams, Jonathan .
NATURE, 2012, 490 (7420) :335-336
[3]   International collaboration clusters in Africa [J].
Adams, Jonathan ;
Gurney, Karen ;
Hook, Daniel ;
Leydesdorff, Loet .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 98 (01) :547-556
[4]   The fourth age of research [J].
Adams, Jonathan .
NATURE, 2013, 497 (7451) :557-560
[5]   Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories [J].
Aksnes, Dag W. ;
Langfeldt, Liv ;
Wouters, Paul .
SAGE OPEN, 2019, 9 (01)
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Science Focus
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Science and Public Policy
[8]   How collaboration type, publication place, funding and author's role affect citations received by publications from Africa: A bibliometric study of LIS research from 1996 to 2015 [J].
Asubiaro, Toluwase .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2019, 120 (03) :1261-1287
[9]   On bibliographic networks [J].
Batagelj, Vladimir ;
Cerinsek, Monika .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 96 (03) :845-864
[10]   Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS): Authors, institutions, and network structures [J].
Bauer, Johann ;
Leydesdorff, Loet ;
Bornmann, Lutz .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 67 (12) :3095-3100