Additional Value of Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI for Evaluating Biliary Tract Cancer: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT

被引:9
作者
Yoo, Jeongin [1 ]
Lee, Jeong Min [2 ,3 ]
Yoon, Jeong Hee [4 ]
Joo, Ijin [4 ]
Lee, Dong Ho [4 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Inst Radiat Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Positron-emission tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Biliary tract neoplasms; Multidetector computed tomography; FDG PET/CT; PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT; HILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; LIVER METASTASES; MRI; CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.3348/kjr.2020.0689
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI added to contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in initial staging, assessment of resectability, and postoperative follow-up of biliary tract cancer. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 100 patients (initial workup [n = 65] and postoperative follow-up [n = 35]) who had undergone PET/MRI and CECT for bile duct or gallbladder lesions between January 2013 and March 2020. Two radiologists independently reviewed the CECT imaging set and CECT plus PET/MRI set to determine the likelihood of malignancy, local and overall resectability, and distant metastasis in the initial workup group, and local recurrence and distant metastasis in the follow-up group. Diagnostic performances of the two imaging sets were compared using clinical-surgical-pathologic findings as standards of reference. Results: The diagnostic performance of CECT significantly improved after the addition of PET/MRI for liver metastasis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [A(z)]: 0.77 vs. 0.91 [p = 0.027] for reviewer 1; 0.76 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.021] for reviewer 2), lymph node metastasis (0.73 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.004]; 0.81 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.023]), and overall resectability (0.79 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.007]; 0.82 vs. 0.94 [p = 0.021]) in the initial workup group. In the follow-up group, the diagnostic performance of CECT plus PET/MRI was significantly higher than that of CECT imaging for local recurrence (0.81 vs. 1.00 [p = 0.029]; 0.82 vs. 0.94 [p = 0.045]). Conclusion: PET/MRI may add value to CECT in patients with biliary tract cancer both in the initial workup for staging and determination of overall resectability and in follow-up for Local recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 724
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Response assessment of colorectal liver metastases with contrast enhanced CT/18F-FDG PET
    Garcia Vicente, Ana Maria
    Dominguez Ferreras, Esther
    Sanchez Perez, Victoria
    Poblete Garcia, Victor Manuel
    Villa Guzman, Jose Carlos
    Jimenez Aragon, Fatima
    Pineda Pineda, Maria Dolores
    Molino Trinidad, Ceferino
    Soriano Castrejon, Angel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (06) : E255 - E261
  • [42] Enchondroma of Clivus: Appearance on 18F-FDG PET-CT in Contrast With MRI
    Mukherjee, Anirban
    Singla, Suhas
    Das, Chandan Jyoti
    Bal, Chandrasekhar
    Kumar, Rakesh
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 40 (01) : E53 - E54
  • [43] Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of MRI and Whole Body 18F-FDG PET/CT in Diagnosis of Spondylodiscitis
    Altini, Corinna
    Lavelli, Valentina
    Niccoli-Asabella, Artor
    Sardaro, Angela
    Branca, Alessia
    Santo, Giulia
    Ferrari, Cristina
    Rubini, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (05)
  • [44] 99mTc-Methionine Hybrid SPECT/CT for Detection of Recurrent Glioma: Comparison With 18F-FDG PET/CT and Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Arora, Geetanjali
    Sharma, Punit
    Sharma, Anshul
    Mishra, Anil Kumar
    Hazari, Puja Panwar
    Biswas, Ahitagni
    Garg, Ajay
    Aheer, Deepak
    Kumar, Rakesh
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 43 (05) : e132 - e138
  • [45] Does 18F-FDG PET/MRI reduce the number of indeterminate abdominal incidentalomas compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT?
    Schaarschmidt, Benedikt M.
    Grueneisen, Johannes
    Heusch, Philipp
    Gomez, Benedikt
    Umutlu, Lale
    Ruhlmann, Verena
    Rosenbaum-Krumme, Sandra
    Antoch, Gerald
    Buchbender, Christian
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 36 (06) : 588 - 595
  • [46] Head-to-head comparison between 18F-FDG PET/low-dose CT and 18F-FDG PET/contrast-enhanced CT in relapsing ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Massollo, Michela
    Treglia, Giorgio
    Trimboli, Pierpaolo
    Fiz, Francesco
    Ugolini, Martina
    Piccardo, Arnoldo
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL IMAGING, 2021, 9 (01) : 73 - 81
  • [47] 18F-FDG PET/CT in lung cancer. The added value of quantification
    Lapa, P.
    Marques, M.
    Isidoro, J.
    Barata, F.
    Costa, G.
    de Lima, J. P.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE MEDICINA NUCLEAR E IMAGEN MOLECULAR, 2017, 36 (06): : 342 - 349
  • [48] The value of whole-body contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in the diagnosis and staging of patients with laryngeal carcinoma
    Tatar, Gamze
    Cermik, Tevfik F.
    Karagoz, Yesim
    Gundogan, Cihan
    Karacetin, Didem
    Yildiz, Elif
    Yigit, Ozgur
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 39 (04) : 334 - 342
  • [49] The value of combined MRI, enhanced CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of recurrence and metastasis after surgery for ovarian cancer
    Hong, Yong
    Peng, Jianfeng
    Zeng, Yanni
    Deng, Xuewen
    Xu, Wanjun
    Wang, Juanting
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 26 (12) : 3013 - 3019
  • [50] Pretherapeutic Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer: Comparison of FDG PET/CT Plus Delayed PET/MR and Contrast-Enhanced CT/MR
    Zhang, Zaizhu
    Zhou, Nina
    Guo, Xiaoyi
    Li, Nan
    Zhu, Hua
    Yang, Zhi
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11