Additional Value of Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI for Evaluating Biliary Tract Cancer: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT

被引:9
作者
Yoo, Jeongin [1 ]
Lee, Jeong Min [2 ,3 ]
Yoon, Jeong Hee [4 ]
Joo, Ijin [4 ]
Lee, Dong Ho [4 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Inst Radiat Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Positron-emission tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Biliary tract neoplasms; Multidetector computed tomography; FDG PET/CT; PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT; HILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; LIVER METASTASES; MRI; CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.3348/kjr.2020.0689
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI added to contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in initial staging, assessment of resectability, and postoperative follow-up of biliary tract cancer. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 100 patients (initial workup [n = 65] and postoperative follow-up [n = 35]) who had undergone PET/MRI and CECT for bile duct or gallbladder lesions between January 2013 and March 2020. Two radiologists independently reviewed the CECT imaging set and CECT plus PET/MRI set to determine the likelihood of malignancy, local and overall resectability, and distant metastasis in the initial workup group, and local recurrence and distant metastasis in the follow-up group. Diagnostic performances of the two imaging sets were compared using clinical-surgical-pathologic findings as standards of reference. Results: The diagnostic performance of CECT significantly improved after the addition of PET/MRI for liver metastasis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [A(z)]: 0.77 vs. 0.91 [p = 0.027] for reviewer 1; 0.76 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.021] for reviewer 2), lymph node metastasis (0.73 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.004]; 0.81 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.023]), and overall resectability (0.79 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.007]; 0.82 vs. 0.94 [p = 0.021]) in the initial workup group. In the follow-up group, the diagnostic performance of CECT plus PET/MRI was significantly higher than that of CECT imaging for local recurrence (0.81 vs. 1.00 [p = 0.029]; 0.82 vs. 0.94 [p = 0.045]). Conclusion: PET/MRI may add value to CECT in patients with biliary tract cancer both in the initial workup for staging and determination of overall resectability and in follow-up for Local recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 724
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CT in whole-body staging of recurrent breast cancer
    Sawicki, Lino M.
    Grueneisen, Johannes
    Schaarschmidt, Benedikt M.
    Buchbender, Christian
    Nagarajah, James
    Umutlu, Lale
    Antoch, Gerald
    Kinner, Sonja
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (02) : 459 - 465
  • [32] Imaging Features of Multiple Myeloma Extramedullary Lesions in the Liver with 18F-FDG PET/CT, Contrast-Enhanced CT and MRI
    Papamichail, Dimitris
    Hog, Robert
    Goldschmidt, Hartmut
    Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2019, 9 (04)
  • [33] Measurement Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET/CT Versus 18F-FDG PET/MRI in Solid Tumors of the Pelvis
    Fraum, Tyler J.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Crandall, John P.
    Laforest, Richard A.
    Salter, Amber
    An, Hongyu
    Jacobs, Michael A.
    Grigsby, Perry W.
    Dehdashti, Farrokh
    Wahl, Richard L.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 60 (08) : 1080 - 1086
  • [34] Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET-CT as a prognostic marker in advanced biliary tract cancer
    Braghiroli, Maria I.
    Mota, Jose M.
    Duarte, Paulo S.
    Morita, Tiago O.
    Bariani, Giovanni M.
    Nebuloni, Daniela
    Buchpiguel, Carlos A.
    Hoff, Paulo M.
    Riechelmann, Rachel P.
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 39 (03) : 252 - 259
  • [35] Incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the colon: value of contrast-enhanced CT correlation with colonoscopic findings
    Kirchner, Julian
    Schaarschmidt, Benedikt M.
    Kour, Firas
    Sawicki, Lino M.
    Martin, Ole
    Bode, Johannes
    vom Dahl, Stephan
    Keitel, Verena
    Haeussinger, Dieter
    Antke, Christina
    Buchbender, Christian
    Antoch, Gerald
    Heusch, Philipp
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2020, 47 (04) : 778 - 786
  • [36] Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent uterine cancer: comparison with PET and enhanced CT
    Kitajima, Kazuhiro
    Murakami, Koji
    Yamasaki, Erena
    Domeki, Yasushi
    Kaji, Yasushi
    Morita, Satoru
    Suganuma, Narufumi
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2009, 36 (03) : 362 - 372
  • [37] Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in Predicting the Clinicopathologic Subtypes of Invasive Breast Cancer
    Miyake, Kanae Kawai
    Nakamoto, Yuji
    Kanao, Shotaro
    Tanaka, Shiro
    Sugie, Tomoharu
    Mikami, Yoshiki
    Toi, Masakazu
    Togashi, Kaori
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 203 (02) : 272 - 279
  • [38] Characterization of tubo-ovarian abscess mimicking adnexal masses: Comparison between contrast-enhanced CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI
    Fan, Hua
    Wang, Ting-Ting
    Ren, Gang
    Fu, Hong-Liang
    Wu, Xiang-Ru
    Chu, Cai-Ting
    Li, Wen-Hua
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 57 (01): : 40 - 46
  • [39] Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the staging and restaging of colorectal cancer: Comparison with PET and enhanced CT
    Dirisamer, Albert
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Floery, Daniel
    Wolf, Florian
    Beheshti, Mohsen
    Mayerhoefer, Marius E.
    Langsteger, Werner
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 73 (02) : 324 - 328
  • [40] Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/contrast-enhanced CT versus contrast-enhanced CT alone for post-treatment detection of ovarian malignancy
    Tawakol, Ahmed
    Abdelhafez, Yasser G.
    Osama, Amr
    Hamada, Emad
    El Refaei, Sherif
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 37 (05) : 453 - 460