Additional Value of Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI for Evaluating Biliary Tract Cancer: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT

被引:9
|
作者
Yoo, Jeongin [1 ]
Lee, Jeong Min [2 ,3 ]
Yoon, Jeong Hee [4 ]
Joo, Ijin [4 ]
Lee, Dong Ho [4 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Inst Radiat Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Positron-emission tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Biliary tract neoplasms; Multidetector computed tomography; FDG PET/CT; PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT; HILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; LIVER METASTASES; MRI; CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.3348/kjr.2020.0689
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI added to contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in initial staging, assessment of resectability, and postoperative follow-up of biliary tract cancer. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 100 patients (initial workup [n = 65] and postoperative follow-up [n = 35]) who had undergone PET/MRI and CECT for bile duct or gallbladder lesions between January 2013 and March 2020. Two radiologists independently reviewed the CECT imaging set and CECT plus PET/MRI set to determine the likelihood of malignancy, local and overall resectability, and distant metastasis in the initial workup group, and local recurrence and distant metastasis in the follow-up group. Diagnostic performances of the two imaging sets were compared using clinical-surgical-pathologic findings as standards of reference. Results: The diagnostic performance of CECT significantly improved after the addition of PET/MRI for liver metastasis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [A(z)]: 0.77 vs. 0.91 [p = 0.027] for reviewer 1; 0.76 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.021] for reviewer 2), lymph node metastasis (0.73 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.004]; 0.81 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.023]), and overall resectability (0.79 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.007]; 0.82 vs. 0.94 [p = 0.021]) in the initial workup group. In the follow-up group, the diagnostic performance of CECT plus PET/MRI was significantly higher than that of CECT imaging for local recurrence (0.81 vs. 1.00 [p = 0.029]; 0.82 vs. 0.94 [p = 0.045]). Conclusion: PET/MRI may add value to CECT in patients with biliary tract cancer both in the initial workup for staging and determination of overall resectability and in follow-up for Local recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 724
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance of integrated FDG PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer: Comparison with integrated FDG PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and enhanced CT
    Kitajima, Kazuhiro
    Murakami, Koji
    Yamasaki, Erena
    Domeki, Yasushi
    Tsubaki, Masahiro
    Sunagawa, Masakatsu
    Kaji, Yasushi
    Suganuma, Narufumi
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2009, 36 (09) : 1388 - 1396
  • [22] Detection of underlying malignancy in patients with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT
    Schramm, N.
    Rominger, A.
    Schmidt, C.
    Morelli, J. N.
    Schmid-Tannwald, C.
    Meinel, F. G.
    Reiser, M. F.
    Rist, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 (07) : 1014 - 1024
  • [23] Diagnostic value of integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI for staging of endometrial carcinoma: comparison with PET/CT
    Yu, Yang
    Zhang, Le
    Sultana, Bilkis
    Wang, Bo
    Sun, Hongzan
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [24] Multiple Pathologies Seen on a Single Contrast-Enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Sharma, Punit
    Marangmei, Chung
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 40 (09) : 750 - 751
  • [25] Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT compared with that of contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast at 3 T
    Magometschnigg, Heinrich F.
    Baltzer, Pascal A.
    Fueger, Barbara
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Karanikas, Georgios
    Dubsky, Peter
    Rudas, Margaretha
    Weber, Michael
    Pinker, Katja
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 (11) : 1656 - 1665
  • [26] Additional Value of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT Comparing to MRI in Treatment Approach of Anal Cancer Patients
    Manafi-Farid, Reyhaneh
    Kupferthaler, Alexander
    Wundsam, Helwig
    Gruber, Georg
    Vali, Reza
    Venhoda, Clemens
    Track, Christine
    Beheshti, Ali
    Langsteger, Werner
    Geinitz, Hans
    Beheshti, Mohsen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (09) : 1 - 16
  • [27] Is integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT in the differentiation of incidental tracer uptake in the head and neck area?
    Schaarschmidt, Benedikt Michael
    Gomez, Benedikt
    Buchbender, Christian
    Grueneisen, Johannes
    Nensa, Felix
    Sawicki, Lino Morris
    Ruhlmann, Verena
    Wetter, Axel
    Antoch, Gerald
    Heusch, Philipp
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 23 (02) : 127 - 132
  • [28] Consequences of additional use of contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT in target volume delineation and dose distribution for pancreatic cancer
    Li, X-X
    Liu, N-B
    Zhu, L.
    Yuan, X-K
    Yang, C-W
    Ren, P.
    Gong, L-L
    Zhao, L-J
    Xu, W-G
    Wang, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1051)
  • [29] Evaluating the Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Cancer of Unknown Primary
    Sivakumaran, Tharani
    Cardin, Anthony
    Callahan, Jason
    Wong, Hui-li
    Tothill, Richard W.
    Hicks, Rodney J.
    Mileshkin, Linda R.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 65 (10) : 1557 - 1563
  • [30] Prospective comparison of combined 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET/CT vs. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for detection of malignancy
    Lin, Frank I.
    Rao, Jyotsna E.
    Mittra, Erik S.
    Nallapareddy, Kavitha
    Chengapa, Alka
    Dick, David W.
    Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam
    Iagaru, Andrei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2012, 39 (02) : 262 - 270