Feeling we're biased: Autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict

被引:84
作者
De Neys, Wim [1 ,3 ]
Moyens, Elke [2 ]
Vansteenwegen, Debora [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse, Toulouse, France
[2] Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
[3] CNRS, Toulouse, France
关键词
BELIEF-BIAS; COGNITIVE CONTROL; 2; SYSTEMS; THINKING; ACCOUNTS; CORTEX; BRAIN; ERROR;
D O I
10.3758/CABN.10.2.208
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Human reasoning is often biased by intuitive beliefs. A key question is whether the bias results from a failure to detect that the intuitions conflict with logical considerations or from a failure to discard these tempting intuitions. The present study addressed this unresolved debate by focusing on conflict-related autonomic nervous system modulation during biased reasoning. Participants' skin conductance responses (SCRs) were monitored while they solved classic syllogisms in which a cued intuitive response could be inconsistent or consistent with the logical correct response. Results indicated that all reasoners showed increased SCRs when solving the inconsistent conflict problems. Experiment 2 validated that this autonomic arousal boost was absent when people were not engaged in an active reasoning task. The presence of a clear autonomic conflict response during reasoning lends credence to the idea that reasoners have a "gut" feeling that signals that their intuitive response is not logically warranted. Supplemental materials for this article may be downloaded from http://cabn.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 216
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]   The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control [J].
Ridderinkhof, KR ;
Ullsperger, M ;
Crone, EA ;
Nieuwenhuis, S .
SCIENCE, 2004, 306 (5695) :443-447
[32]   The domain specificity and generality of belief bias:: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill [J].
Sá, WC ;
West, RF ;
Stanovich, KE .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 91 (03) :497-510
[33]   The empirical case for two systems of reasoning [J].
Sloman, SA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 119 (01) :3-22
[34]   Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? [J].
Stanovich, KE ;
West, RF .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2000, 23 (05) :645-+
[35]  
Thompson V.A., 2009, 2 MINDS DUAL PROCESS, P171
[36]   Scanning the "Fringe" of consciousness: What is felt and what is not felt in intuitions about semantic coherence [J].
Topolinski, Sascha ;
Strack, Fritz .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2009, 18 (03) :608-618
[37]   Neural correlates of dual-task effect on belief-bias syllogistic reasoning: A near-infrared spectroscopy study [J].
Tsujii, Takeo ;
Watanabe, Shigeru .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2009, 1287 :118-125
[38]   Conflict and cognitive control in the brain [J].
van Veen, Vincent ;
Carter, Cameron S. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 15 (05) :237-240
[39]   DUAL PROCESSES IN REASONING [J].
WASON, PC ;
EVANS, JSBT .
COGNITION, 1975, 3 (02) :141-154
[40]   Unconscious emotion [J].
Winkielman, P ;
Berridge, KC .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 13 (03) :120-123