Gaining access to a research site and participants in medical and nursing research: a synthesis of accounts

被引:8
作者
Hoyland, Sindre [1 ]
Hollund, Jan G. [2 ]
Olsen, Odd E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Ctr Risk Management & Soc Safety, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway
[2] Stavanger Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
SAFE WORK PRACTICES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; PALLIATIVE CARE; HEALTH-CARE; ETHNOGRAPHY; ISSUES; GATEKEEPERS; CHALLENGES; FIELDWORK; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1111/medu.12622
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe literature contains few accounts of how access to a research site and participants in medical and nursing research is gained, and few efforts to synthesise the existing accounts. Therefore, this article has two main goals: (i) to synthesise our own account of access with others in the medical and nursing literature, and (ii) to derive from this synthesis considerations of access and implications for health professions education. MethodsBased on field notes from a study conducted in an orthopaedic surgical section of a Norwegian university hospital, we provide an account of how access to the operating theatre (research site) and surgical teams (participants) was achieved. We synthesise the findings by comparing our account with existing accounts on access. ResultsOur synthesis translates into a number of considerations related to the gaining of access to a research site and participants in medical and nursing research. These include conducting continuous negotiations to ensure the agreement and consent of participants and gatekeepers, and demonstrating transparency regarding the researcher's identity and the nature of the particular project and findings. These considerations can raise awareness and preparedness for the process of gaining access, which will benefit health professions education researchers planning or undertaking studies in educational or clinical settings. Health professions educators can also include the considerations in structured educational programmes, specifically methods courses, to instil similar awareness and preparedness in students. ConclusionsWe suggest that future medical and nursing research should emphasise a detailed, unvarnished documentation of the access process that incorporates existing accounts of the process. Discuss ideas arising from the article at discuss.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 232
页数:9
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Research sensitivities to palliative care patients [J].
Addington-Hall, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2002, 11 (03) :220-224
[2]   Ethnography and the ethics of undertaking research in different mental healthcare settings [J].
Allbutt, H. ;
Masters, H. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2010, 17 (03) :210-215
[3]  
Allen Davina, 2004, Nurs Inq, V11, P14, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2004.00201.x
[4]  
Ames J C, 2001, Bull Med Ethics, P15
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Principles of Biomedical Ethics
[7]  
[Anonymous], RES PROCESS NURSING
[8]   Reflexivity A challenge for the researcher as practitioner? [J].
Arber, Anne .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2006, 11 (02) :147-157
[9]   Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? [J].
Barbour, RS .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7294) :1115-1117
[10]  
Barker John., 2003, QUAL RES, V3, P207