The use of Oral Health Impact on Daily Living (OHIDL) transition scale in measuring the change in oral health-related quality of life among older adults

Background This longitudinal study aimed to evaluate the longitudinal validity and reliability of the Oral Health Impact on Daily Living (OHIDL) transition scale and measure the perceived change in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) after dental treatments among older adults. Methods OHIDL was administered to older adults who sought dental treatments. Participants were asked to assess changes in impact for each OHIDL item retrospectively compared with that before the treatment. The responsiveness, minimal clinically important difference (MCID), internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the OHIDL transition scale were evaluated. Multiple linear regression was employed to predict the change in oral health impacts after dental treatment. Beta coefficients (beta) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. Results One hundred and seventy-six participants were followed-up with upon completing their dental treatments. The follow-up rate was 70.4% (176/250). The OHIDL transition score strongly correlated with the global rating of change (r(s) = 0.76, P < 0.01). MCID was determined by participants who reported "a little improved" in the perceived oral health impacts, and their mean transition score was 3.3. Cronbach's alpha of the transition scale was 0.87, and many items had a test-retest correlation of at least 0.60. Patients who perceived more oral health impacts at baseline as measured by the total intensity score (beta = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.44, P < 0.001) and those who had received endodontic treatment (beta = 8.04, 95% CI: 4.36, 11.71, P < 0.001) would have more improvement in perceived oral health impacts. Conclusions The OHIDL transition scale has good psychometric properties and is sensitive to change over time. After receiving dental treatment, most of the study's older adults perceived a lower intensity of OHIDL.