Paediatric upper limb fracture healing time prediction using a machine learning approach

被引:3
作者
Lau, Chia Fong [1 ]
Malek, Sorayya [1 ]
Gunalan, Roshan [2 ]
Chee, W. H. [2 ]
Saw, A. [2 ]
Aziz, Firdaus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Inst Biol Sci, Bioinformat, Fac Sci, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaya, Dept Orthopaed NOCERAL, Fac Med, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
关键词
Upper limb; paediatric orthopaedic; Support Vector Regression; Random Forest; self-organising maps; machine learning; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; CLASSIFICATION; OSTEOPOROSIS; SVM;
D O I
10.1080/26895293.2022.2064923
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To analyse and predict the healing time of upper limb fractures in children, machine learning algorithms were used. Paediatric orthopaedic data was obtained from the University Malaya Medical Centre. The data set includes radiographs of upper limb fractures involving the radius, ulna, and humerus in children under the age of twelve, with ages recorded from the date and time of initial injury. Inputs assessment included: age, gender, bone type, the number of bones involved, fracture type, angulation and the distance of the fracture. Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) algorithms were used to predict and identify variables associated with fracture healing time. Self Organizing Maps was then used for visualization and ordination of factors associated with healing time. Algorithms performance was measured using root mean square error (RMSE). A significant determinant in fracture healing includes age, bone part, fracture angulation, and distance. The Wilcoxon signed ranked test reported there is a significant difference between the prediction result of the SVR model (RMSE = 2.56) and the RF model (RMSE = 2.66). Predicting healing time can be used in the treatment process and follow up period for general practitioners and medical officers. The algorithm is deployed online at https://kidsfractureexpert.com/.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 499
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures
    Archer, Kelfie J.
    Kirnes, Ryan V.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2008, 52 (04) : 2249 - 2260
  • [2] Armstrong JS, 2001, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V30, P443
  • [3] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [4] Budd L, 2012, BASIC TYPES PEDIAT F
  • [5] Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression
    Bursac, Zoran
    Gauss, C. Heath
    Williams, David Keith
    Hosmer, David W.
    [J]. SOURCE CODE FOR BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2008, 3 (01):
  • [6] Cristianini N., 2000, INTRO SUPPORT VECTOR
  • [7] Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest -: art. no. 3
    Díaz-Uriarte, R
    de Andrés, SA
    [J]. BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2006, 7 (1)
  • [8] Augmented Backward Elimination: A Pragmatic and Purposeful Way to Develop Statistical Models
    Dunkler, Daniela
    Plischke, Max
    Leffondre, Karen
    Heinze, Georg
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11):
  • [9] Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney or t-test? On assumptions for hypothesis tests and multiple interpretations of decision rules
    Fay, Michael P.
    Proschan, Michael A.
    [J]. STATISTICS SURVEYS, 2010, 4 : 1 - 39
  • [10] GEISSER S, 1993, AM J HUM GENET, V53, P1103