Environmental impact assessment of a real geothermal driven power plant with two-stage ORC using enhanced exergo-environmental analysis

被引:30
作者
Gurbuz, Emine Yagiz [1 ]
Guler, Onur Vahip [1 ]
Kecebas, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Technol Fac, Dept Energy Syst Engn, Mugla, Turkey
关键词
Geothermal driven power plant; Organic rankine cycle; Enhanced exergo-environmental analysis; Environmental impact; Exergy destruction; Pollution formation; ADVANCED EXERGOENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SYSTEM; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.097
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Geothermal driven power plants (GPPs) with two-stage ORC are mostly used in low-temperature geothermal fields around the World. The environmental impacts of these GPPs create a gap in the literature. In this study, enhanced exergo-environmental analysis for the GPP and its components is conducted as a case study. With the analysis, the component-related, exergy degradation-related, and pollution formation-related environmental impacts (EIs) are separated endogenous/exogenous and avoidable/unavoidable parts. In this way, detailed information about the interaction and improvement potential between components is acquired by using the recommended performance indicators. The results of the study show that for the enhanced exergo-environmental analysis, EI related to exergy destruction of components is predominated. In the traditional exergo-environmental analysis the total amount of EI is condenser with 1.386 Pt/h while in the enhanced one the highest avoidable-endogenous exergy destruction is condenser with 716 Pt/h. The value of EI which is caused by electricity generation is 0.108 Pts/kWh. The EI value of geothermal fluid is 11.8 Pt/GJ. The EI value of the plant's avoidable endogenous pollution formation is 8 Pt/h. As the reason for this, the mass flow rate of the geothermal fluid steam and the amount of NCG gas in it are effective. Eventually, if the plant could be operated under enhanced analysis' operation conditions, the EI of released CO2 value can be reduced by 8.4% by carbon capture and storage. Thus, the details of the analyzes performed for the plant are expected to guide the researchers. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1110 / 1123
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Advanced exergoenvironmental assessment of a natural gas-fired electricity generating facility [J].
Acikkalp, Emin ;
Aras, Haydar ;
Hepbasli, Arif .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 81 :112-119
[2]  
Aksoy N, 2015, PROC WORLD GEOTHERM, V1, P19
[3]   Environmental assessment of a binary geothermal sourced power plant accompanied by exergy analysis [J].
Basogul, Yusuf .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 195 :492-501
[4]   Review on life cycle environmental effects of geothermal power generation [J].
Bayer, Peter ;
Rybach, Ladislaus ;
Blum, Philipp ;
Brauchler, Ralf .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 26 :446-463
[5]   Geothermal power generation in the world 2010-2014 update report [J].
Bertani, Ruggero .
GEOTHERMICS, 2016, 60 :31-43
[6]   Conventional and advanced exergoenvironmental analysis of a steam methane reforming reactor for hydrogen production [J].
Boyano, A. ;
Morosuk, T. ;
Blanco-Marigorta, A. M. ;
Tsatsaronis, G. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 20 (01) :152-160
[7]   Exergoenvironmental analysis of a steam methane reforming process for hydrogen production [J].
Boyano, A. ;
Blanco-Marigorta, A. M. ;
Morosuk, T. ;
Tsatsaronis, G. .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (04) :2202-2214
[8]  
Bruyn ST., 2018, Environmental prices handbook. Methods and numbers for valuation of environmental impacts
[9]   Exergoenvironmental results of a eucalyptus biomass-fired power plant [J].
Cavalcanti, Eduardo J. C. ;
Carvalho, Monica ;
Azevedo, Jonathan L. B. .
ENERGY, 2019, 189
[10]   Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated solar combined cycle system [J].
Cidade Cavalcanti, Eduardo Jose .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 :507-519