Comparison of 3 T mpMRI and pelvic CT examinations for detection of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer

被引:5
作者
Valentin, B. [1 ]
Arsov, C. [2 ]
Ullrich, T. [1 ]
Demetrescu, D. [1 ]
Morawitz, J. [1 ]
Al-Monajjed, R. [2 ]
Quentin, M. [1 ]
Kirchner, J. [1 ]
Esposito, I [3 ]
Albers, P. [2 ]
Antoch, G. [1 ]
Schimmoeller, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Dept Urol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Pathol, Med Fac, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; interventional; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; SCORING SYSTEM; MRI; VALIDATION; DISSECTION; BLADDER; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110110
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study investigates preoperative lymph node metastases (LNM) detection accuracy by MRI and CT in patients with prostate cancer (PCA). Methods: All patients with preoperative MRI, CT or both and subsequent radical prostatectomy (RPE) and lymphadenectomy (LA) were included in this retrospective cohort study. Prostate specific antigen (PSA), PIRADS, ISUP grade group, clinical and pathological tumor (T) stage was compared between negative and positive nodal (N) stage. LNM were assessed with size and localization and weather they were preoperatively detected or not. In patients with preoperative CT and MRI, the results were compared intermodally. The reference standard was the histopathological results after RPE and LA. Results: A total of 228 patients were analysed including 24 patients with confirmed LNM (N1; 11%). PSA (median 9.7 vs. 14 ng/ml), PI-RADS (median 4 vs. 5), ISUP (median 2 vs. 4), and cT/pT-stage (median T2 vs. T3) was significantly higher in patients with LNM. No LNM were found in patients with ISUP-1-PCA. MRI was able to detect 67% of patients with LNM. Lymph node metastases presented on MRI predominantly small, round-shaped, located parailiacally with a minimum SAD of 4 mm (vs. CT SAD of 8 mm). In comparison, MRI was superior to CT in the detection of LNM (sensitivity 81% vs. 33%; specificity 99% vs. 97). Conclusion: LNM were very rare in patients with PSA < 10 ng/ml, PI-RADS < 4, and < cT2. MRI could detect LNM up to 4 mm with a moderate sensitivity and high specificity. Thus, MRI might optimise the preoperative diagnostic and therapy planning of patients with PCA, whereas CT was clearly limited for N-stage assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Contemporary Incidence and Outcomes of Prostate Cancer Lymph Node Metastases
    Bernstein, Adrien N.
    Shoag, Jonathan E.
    Golan, Ron
    Halpern, Joshua A.
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Hsu, Wei-Chun
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Sedrakyan, Art
    Chen, Ronald C.
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Hu, Jim C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (06) : 1511 - 1518
  • [42] Development of a Radiomic-Based Model Predicting Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer Patients
    Bourbonne, Vincent
    Jaouen, Vincent
    Nguyen, Truong An
    Tissot, Valentin
    Doucet, Laurent
    Hatt, Mathieu
    Visvikis, Dimitris
    Pradier, Olivier
    Valeri, Antoine
    Fournier, Georges
    Schick, Ulrike
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (22)
  • [43] PI-RADS version 2: Preoperative role in the detection of normal-sized pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer
    Park, Sung Yoon
    Shin, Jin
    Jung, Dae Chul
    Cho, Nam Hoon
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Hong, Sung Joon
    Oh, Young Taik
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 91 : 22 - 28
  • [44] Prevalence and size of pelvic sentinel lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer
    Bollino, Michele
    Geppert, Barbara
    Lonnerfors, Celine
    Masback, Anna
    Kasselaki, Ioanna
    Persson, Jan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, 209
  • [45] Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Atef, Y.
    Koedam, T. W.
    van Oostendorp, S. E.
    Bonjer, H. J.
    Wijsmuller, A. R.
    Tuynman, J. B.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 43 (12) : 3198 - 3206
  • [46] Prediction of pelvic lymph node metastases and PSMA PET positive pelvic lymph nodes with multiparametric MRI and clinical information in primary staging of prostate cancer
    Hotker, Andreas M.
    Muhlematter, Urs
    Beintner-Skawran, Stephan
    Ghafoor, Soleen
    Burger, Irene
    Huellner, Martin
    Eberli, Daniel
    Donati, Olivio F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2023, 10
  • [47] Assessing the most accurate formula to predict the risk of lymph node metastases from prostate cancer in contemporary patients treated with radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection
    Abdollah, Firas
    Cozzarini, Cesare
    Sun, Maxine
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Gallina, Andrea
    Passoni, Niccolo Maria
    Bianchi, Marco
    Tutolo, Manuela
    Fossati, Nicola
    Nini, Alessandro
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Salonia, Andrea
    Karakiewicz, Pierre
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 109 (02) : 211 - 216
  • [48] Cost-analysis of staging methods for lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer:: MRI with a lymph node-specific contrast agent compared to pelvic lymph node dissection or CT
    Hövels, AM
    Heesakkers, RAM
    Adang, EM
    Jager, GJ
    Barentsz, JO
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (09) : 1707 - 1712
  • [49] High body mass index predicts multiple prostate cancer lymph node metastases after radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection
    Porcaro, Antonio B.
    Tafuri, Alessandro
    Sebben, Marco
    Processali, Tania
    Pirozzi, Marco
    Amigoni, Nelia
    Rizzetto, Riccardo
    Shakir, Aliasger
    Cerruto, Maria Angela
    Brunelli, Matteo
    Siracusano, Salvatore
    Artibani, Walter
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2020, 22 (03) : 323 - 329
  • [50] Cost-analysis of staging methods for lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: MRI with a lymph node-specific contrast agent compared to pelvic lymph node dissection or CT
    Anke M. Hövels
    Roel A. M. Heesakkers
    Eddy M. Adang
    Gerrit J. Jager
    Jelle O. Barentsz
    European Radiology, 2004, 14 : 1707 - 1712