Phase I-II study of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and long-term oral etoposide (FLAME) in unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer

被引:1
作者
Bjarnason, GA
Cripps, C
Goel, R
Fine, S
Oza, AM
Skillings, JR
Kerr, I
Germond, CJ
Moore, MJ
Maroun, JA
Franssen, E
Dulude, H
机构
[1] Toronto Sunnybrook Reg Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Ottawa Reg Canc Ctr, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4K7, Canada
[3] Credit Valley Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
[5] Nova Scotia Canc Treatment & Res Fdn, Halifax, NS, Canada
[6] NE Ontario Reg Canc Ctr, Sudbury, ON, Canada
[7] Bristol Myers Squibb Canada Inc, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS | 1998年 / 21卷 / 06期
关键词
gastric cancer; phase I; phase II; Metastatic disease; 5-fluorouracil; leucovorin; doxorubicin; methotrexate; etoposide; chemotherapy;
D O I
10.1097/00000421-199812000-00001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The objective of this phase I-II study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and oral etoposide (FLAME) in patients with measurable unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer. Starting doses on the phase I study were as follows: methotrexate 50 mg/m(2) intravenous bolus day 1; leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) intravenous bolus days 2 through 4, starting 24 hours after the methotrexate dose; 5-fluorouracil 325 mg/m(2) intravenous bolus 15 minutes after leucovorin days 2 through 4; doxorubicin 25 mg/m(2) intravenous bolus day 8; and oral etoposide 50 mg/day for 14 days, starting on day 8. A new cycle started on day 28. A total of 42 patients were treated-10 patients in the phase I study and 32 patients in the phase II study. Dose-limiting toxicity was encountered in the phase I study on the second escalation step, when doxorubicin was escalated to 30 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil was escalated to 350 mg/m(2). In the phase II study 28 patients (109 courses) were evaluable for toxicity. Neutropenia grade 3 or more was dose limiting and was documented in 12 patients (43%) during 22 treatment courses (20%). Neutropenia was associated with febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization in four patients during five courses of therapy. Grade 3 stomatitis and grade 3 diarrhea was infrequent, documented in two patients (two courses) and three patients (four courses), respectively. All other toxicity was grade 1 and grade 2. The combined objective response rate in 38 evaluable patients entered in both studies was 23.3% (six partial responses and one complete response). Stable disease was documented in 15 patients (39.5%). The median survival for the 42 patients entered in both trials was 6.9 months (95% confidence interval, 5.9-8.5 months). The objective response rate and median survival for the combined group is comparable with that reported for the etoposide, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (ELF), and 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate (FMTX) regimens in a recently reported, multicenter, phase III study.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 542
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   HIGH-DOSE METHOTREXATE - A CRITICAL REAPPRAISAL [J].
ACKLAND, SP ;
SCHILSKY, RL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 5 (12) :2017-2031
[2]  
AJANI JA, 1990, CANCER S1, V67, P260
[3]   RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF 2 SCHEDULES OF FLUOROURACIL AND LEUCOVORIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED COLORECTAL-CANCER [J].
BUROKER, TR ;
OCONNELL, MJ ;
WIEAND, HS ;
KROOK, JE ;
GERSTNER, JB ;
MAILLIARD, JA ;
SCHAEFER, PL ;
LEVITT, R ;
KARDINAL, CG ;
GESME, DH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (01) :14-20
[4]   METHOTREXATE DISPOSITION IN HUMANS - CASE STUDIES IN OVARIAN CANCER AND FOLLOWING HIGH-DOSE INFUSION [J].
CHABNER, BA ;
STOLLER, RG ;
HANDE, K ;
JACOBS, S ;
YOUNG, RC .
DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS, 1978, 8 (01) :107-117
[5]   A COMPARISON OF 3 CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC REGIMENS IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PANCREATIC AND GASTRIC-CARCINOMA - FLUOROURACIL VS FLUOROURACIL AND DOXORUBICIN VS FLUOROURACIL, DOXORUBICIN, AND MITOMYCIN [J].
CULLINAN, SA ;
MOERTEL, CG ;
FLEMING, TR ;
RUBIN, JR ;
KROOK, JE ;
EVERSON, LK ;
WINDSCHITL, HE ;
TWITO, DI ;
MARSCHKE, RF ;
FOLEY, JF ;
PFEIFLE, DM ;
BARLOW, JF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1985, 253 (14) :2061-2067
[6]  
GRECO FA, 1991, CANCER, V67, P303
[7]   FAMTX VERSUS ETOPOSIDE, DOXORUBICIN, AND CISPLATIN - A RANDOM ASSIGNMENT TRIAL IN GASTRIC-CANCER [J].
KELSEN, D ;
ATIQ, OT ;
SALTZ, L ;
NIEDZWIECKI, D ;
GINN, D ;
CHAPMAN, D ;
HEELAN, R ;
LIGHTDALE, C ;
VINCIGUERRA, V ;
BRENNAN, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 10 (04) :541-548
[8]   5-FLUOROURACIL, DOXORUBICIN, AND MITOMYCIN (FAM) COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR ADVANCED GASTRIC-CANCER [J].
MACDONALD, JS ;
SCHEIN, PS ;
WOOLLEY, PV ;
SMYTHE, T ;
UENO, W ;
HOTH, D ;
SMITH, F ;
BOIRON, M ;
GISSELBRECHT, C ;
BRUNET, R ;
LAGARDE, C .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1980, 93 (04) :533-536
[9]   THE INFLUENCE OF DRUG INTERVAL ON THE EFFECT OF METHOTREXATE AND FLUOROURACIL IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED COLORECTAL-CANCER [J].
MARSH, JC ;
BERTINO, JR ;
KATZ, KH ;
DAVIS, CA ;
DURIVAGE, HJ ;
ROME, LS ;
RICHARDS, F ;
CAPIZZI, RL ;
FARBER, LR ;
PASQUALE, DN ;
STUART, R ;
KOLETSKY, AJ ;
MAKUCH, R ;
OHOLLAREN, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (03) :371-380
[10]   PRELIMINARY-REPORT OF THE NATIONAL CANCER DATA-BASE [J].
MENCK, HR ;
GARFINKEL, L ;
DODD, GD .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1991, 41 (01) :7-18