Daylight and thermal harvesting performance evaluation of a liquid filled prismatic facade using the Radiance five-phase method and EnergyPlus

被引:30
作者
Vlachokostas, Alex [1 ,2 ]
Madamopoulos, Nicholas [2 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, 902 Battelle Blvd, Richland, WA 99354 USA
[2] CUNY, City Coll, Dept Elect Engn, 160 Convent Ave, New York, NY 10031 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Daylighting; Complex fenestration system; Prismatic louvers; Daylight harvesting facade; Thermal harvesting facade; Five-phase Radiance method; SCATTERING DISTRIBUTION-FUNCTIONS; WINDOW FILM; REDIRECTION; SIMULATION; DESIGN; SYSTEM; VALIDATION; PREDICTION; BLINDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.017
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A dynamic liquid filled prismatic louver (LFPL) facade is evaluated both as a daylight redirecting and an energy harvesting system. The LFPL performs daylight redirection due to its transparent daylight redirecting geometry, whereas it performs thermal harvesting due to its heat absorbing water medium inside the transparent prisms. We evaluate the illuminance levels and daylight glare probability (DGP) of the LFPL system through the Radiance simulation tool, and in particular using the Radiance five-phase method for complex fenestration systems (CFS). In addition, we assess the thermal harvesting potential of the LFPL system and the impact of the enhanced daylight penetration on the reduction of heating, cooling, and fan energy consumption through EnergyPlus simulations. Our study shows that (a) the LFPL system enhances the indoor natural light by 9% and reduces the glare by 20% and (b) although the facade elements have the potential to be rotated, a fixed position of the LFPL works equally well as the dynamic rotation scenarios. A fixed LFPL position is a passive design and thus does not require powering for controlling the facade, which makes the approach simpler. Furthermore, in terms of energy harvesting, the LFPL system shows (c) a 52.4% enhanced solar radiation absorption at the facade level, compared to the baseline glass glazing and (d) a reduction in cooling, heating, and fan requirements by 6.5%, 1.5%, and 5.7%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 409
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   A low environmental impact anidolic facade [J].
Altherr, R ;
Gay, JB .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 37 (12) :1409-1419
[2]  
[Anonymous], BUILD SIM OPT C BSO1
[3]  
Brembilla E., 2017, J BUILD PERFORM SIMU, P1
[4]  
Briggs R.S., ASHRAE WINT M CHIC
[5]   Experimental performance evaluation of aerogel glazing systems [J].
Buratti, C. ;
Moretti, E. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 97 :430-437
[6]   Glazing systems with silica aerogel for energy savings in buildings [J].
Buratti, C. ;
Moretti, E. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 98 :396-403
[7]   High energy-efficientwindows with silica aerogel for building refurbishment: Experimental characterization and preliminary simulations in different climate conditions [J].
Buratti C. ;
Moretti E. ;
Zinzi M. .
Buildings, 2017, 7 (01)
[8]  
C-T Chen, US patent, Patent No. [US5102598 A, 5102598]
[9]   Thermal and lighting effects of an external venetian blind: Experimental analysis in a full scale test room [J].
Carletti, Cristina ;
Sciurpi, Fabio ;
Pierangioli, Leone ;
Asdrubali, Francesco ;
Pisello, Anna Laura ;
Bianchi, Francesco ;
Sambuco, Sara ;
Guattari, Claudia .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 106 :45-56
[10]   Seasonal shading of vertical south-facades with prismatic panes [J].
Christoffers, D .
SOLAR ENERGY, 1996, 57 (05) :339-343