The role of routine abdominal drainage after bariatric surgery: a metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program study

被引:25
作者
Doumouras, Aristithes G. [1 ]
Maeda, Azusa [2 ,3 ]
Jackson, Timothy D. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Hlth Network, Div Gen Surg, Toronto Western Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Bariatric surgery; Abdominal drainage; Anastomotic leak; Y GASTRIC BYPASS; PROFILING HOSPITALS; COMPOSITE MEASURES; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKS; SURGICAL QUALITY; PATIENT SAFETY; MORBID-OBESITY; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.soard.2017.08.019
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The efficacy of drains has long been debated in bariatric surgery. Drains may provide some theoretical benefits to early detection of anastomotic leaks and potential nonoperative treatment; however, there has never been data to support the practice. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of drain placement after bariatric surgery. Setting: This retrospective cohort study includes all hospitals in the United States that participated in the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. Methods: Only patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass were included for the analysis. The main outcomes of interest were anastomotic leak, reoperation, all-cause morbidity, readmission, and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of abdominal drainage on the outcomes of interest. Results: A total of 142,631 patients were identified in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. After adjustment for major clinical variables, the odds of anastomotic leaks increased by 30% with the placement of a drain (odds ratio: 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.57, P = .01) while the odds of reoperation increased by 17% (95% CI: 1.06-1.30, P = .01). The odds of all cause morbidity increased 19% (95% CI: 1.141.25, P < .01), and odds of readmission were significantly higher (odds ratio:1.12, 95% CI:1.061.19, P < .01). The odds of mortality did not change significantly with the placement of a drain. Conclusions: Using a large observational cohort, this study provided no evidence that routine drainage is beneficial to patients, but rather may increase major morbidity. Our findings suggest that the use of routine abdominal drainage should be restricted to very select, high-risk cases. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1997 / 2003
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Routine Abdominal Drains after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Review of 353 Patients [J].
Albanopoulos, Konstantinos ;
Alevizos, Leonidas ;
Linardoutsos, Dimitrios ;
Menenakos, Evangelos ;
Stamou, Konstantinos ;
Vlachos, Konstantinos ;
Zografos, George ;
Leandros, Emmanuel .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2011, 21 (06) :687-691
[2]   How safe is metabolic/diabetes surgery? [J].
Aminian, A. ;
Brethauer, S. A. ;
Kirwan, J. P. ;
Kashyap, S. R. ;
Burguera, B. ;
Schauer, P. R. .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2015, 17 (02) :198-201
[3]   Routine Drainage of the Operative Bed Following Elective Distal Pancreatectomy Does Not Reduce the Occurrence of Complications [J].
Behrman, Stephen W. ;
Zarzaur, Ben L. ;
Parmar, Abhishek ;
Riall, Taylor S. ;
Hall, Bruce L. ;
Pitt, Henry A. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (01) :72-79
[4]   Are There Risk Factors That Increase the Rate of Staple Line Leakage in Patients Undergoing Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity? [J].
Benedix, Frank ;
Benedix, Diana D. ;
Knoll, Christian ;
Weiner, Rudolf ;
Bruns, Christiane ;
Manger, Thomas ;
Stroh, Christine .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2014, 24 (10) :1610-1616
[5]   Hospital Complication Rates With Bariatric Surgery in Michigan [J].
Birkmeyer, Nancy J. O. ;
Dimick, Justin B. ;
Share, David ;
Hawasli, Abdelkader ;
English, Wayne J. ;
Genaw, Jeffrey ;
Finks, Jonathan F. ;
Carlin, Arthur M. ;
Birkmeyer, John D. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 304 (04) :435-442
[6]   Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery [J].
Cheng, Yao ;
Xia, Jie ;
Lai, Mingliang ;
Cheng, Nansheng ;
He, Sirong .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (10)
[7]   Optimizing ACS NSQIP Modeling for Evaluation of Surgical Quality and Risk: Patient Risk Adjustment, Procedure Mix Adjustment, Shrinkage Adjustment, and Surgical Focus [J].
Cohen, Mark E. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. ;
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Zhou, Lynn ;
Huffman, Kristopher ;
Wang, Xue ;
Liu, Yaoming ;
Kraemer, Kari ;
Meng, Xiangju ;
Merkow, Ryan ;
Chow, Warren ;
Matel, Brian ;
Richards, Karen ;
Hart, Amy J. ;
Dimick, Justin B. ;
Hall, Bruce L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (02) :336-+
[8]   Back to basics - clinical diagnosis in bariatric surgery. Routine drains and upper GI series are unnecessary [J].
Dallal, Ramsey M. ;
Bailey, Linda ;
Nahmias, Nissin .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (12) :2268-2271
[9]   Composite Measures for Profiling Hospitals on Bariatric Surgery Performance [J].
Dimick, Justin B. ;
Birkmeyer, Nancy J. ;
Finks, Jonathan F. ;
Share, David A. ;
English, Wayne J. ;
Carlin, Arthur M. ;
Birkmeyer, John D. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (01) :10-16
[10]   Composite Measures for Profiling Hospitals on Surgical Morbidity [J].
Dimick, Justin B. ;
Staiger, Douglas O. ;
Hall, Bruce L. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. ;
Birkmeyer, John D. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (01) :67-72