Motivational influences on performance maintained by food reinforcement

被引:14
作者
North, ST [1 ]
Iwata, BA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Psychol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
motivating operations; establishing operations; abolishing operations; meal effects; satiation; stimulus variation; choice; intermittent reinforcement;
D O I
10.1901/jaba.2005.93-04
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In Study 1, we examined the independent effects of reinforcer consumption during sessions and meal consumption prior to sessions on performance maintained by food reinforcement. Nine individuals with developmental disabilities participated. On alternate days, a preferred edible item was delivered during (a) seven sessions conducted before lunch (repeated-reinforcement condition) versus (b) one session each conducted before and after lunch (pre- and postmeal conditions). Results for 7 of 9 participants showed decreased response rates across sessions in the repeated-reinforcement condition; results for 3 of 9 participants showed decreased rates during postmeal relative to premeal conditions. Two participants who did not show a decrement in responding during either comparison participated in Study 2, in which reinforcer consumption during sessions, combined with meal consumption prior to sessions, also had no effect on their performance. In Study 3, we determined whether (a) choice of reinforcers, (b) increased break time between sessions, (c) varied reinforcers, or (d) intermittent reinforcement schedules mitigated the satiation effects observed for the 7 participants in Study 1. Presession choice of reinforcers resulted in maintained performance for 2 of 6 participants exposed to this condition. Varied reinforcement resulted in maintained performance for only I of 5 participants exposed to this condition. Neither the increased break between sessions nor the intermittent reinforcement schedule was effective in maintaining performance for the participants who were exposed to these conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 333
页数:17
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Assessment of a response bias for aggression over functionally equivalent appropriate behavior [J].
DeLeon, IG ;
Fisher, VW ;
Herman, KM ;
Crosland, KC .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2000, 33 (01) :73-77
[2]   Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments [J].
DeLeon, IG ;
Fisher, WW ;
Rodriguez-Catter, V ;
Maglieri, K ;
Herman, K ;
Marhefka, JM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2001, 34 (04) :463-473
[3]   Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences [J].
DeLeon, IG ;
Iwata, BA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1996, 29 (04) :519-533
[6]   A COMPARISON OF 2 APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES [J].
FISHER, W ;
PIAZZA, CC ;
BOWMAN, LG ;
HAGOPIAN, LP ;
OWENS, JC ;
SLEVIN, I .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1992, 25 (02) :491-498
[7]   On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences [J].
Fisher, WW ;
Thompson, RH ;
Piazza, CC ;
Crosland, K ;
Gotjen, D .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1997, 30 (03) :423-438
[8]   Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures [J].
Geckeler, AS ;
Libby, ME ;
Graff, RB ;
Ahearn, WH .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2000, 33 (03) :347-351
[9]   The effects of establishing operations on preference assessment outcomes [J].
Gottschalk, JM ;
Libby, ME ;
Graff, RB .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2000, 33 (01) :85-88
[10]   Comparison of presession and within-session reinforcement choice [J].
Graff, RB ;
Libby, ME .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1999, 32 (02) :161-173