Development of the CT Syndesmophyte Score (CTSS) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: data from the SIAS cohort

被引:71
作者
de Bruin, Freek [1 ]
de Koning, Anoek [2 ]
van den Berg, Rosaline [2 ]
Baraliakos, Xenofon [3 ]
Braun, Juergen [3 ]
Ramiro, Sofia [2 ]
van Gaalen, Floris A. [2 ]
Reijnierse, Monique [1 ]
van der Heijde, Desiree [2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Dept Rheumatol, Med Ctr, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Zuid Holland, Netherlands
[3] Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Dept Rheumatol, Herne, Germany
关键词
ankylosing spondylitis; outcomes research; spondyloarthritis;
D O I
10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212553
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To develop the CT Syndesmophyte Score (CTSS) for low-dose CT (ldCT) to assess structural damage in the spine of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and test its reliability. Methods P atientswith AS in the SIAS cohort had whole spine ldCT at baseline and 2 years. Syndesmophytes were scored in coronal and sagittal planes in eight quadrants per vertebral unit (VU) as absent=0, < 50% of the intervertebral disc space (IDS)=1, =50%=2 or bridging the IDS=3 (range 0-552). Images were scored by two readers, paired by patient, blinded to time order. Whole spine and spinal segment status and change scores were calculated. Interreader reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), smallest detectable change (SDC) and frequency of scores per VU. Results 49 patients (mean age 50 years (SD 9.8), 84% men, 88% human leucocyte antigen B27 positive) were included. Mean (SD) scores of reader 1 were: whole spine baseline status score 163 (126) and change score 16 (21), spinal segment baseline status scores 30 (41), 97 (77) and 36 (36) and change scores 2 (7), 12 (18) and 3 (4) for the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine, respectively. Scores of reader 2 were similar. Whole spine status score ICC was 0.99 and 0.97-0.98 for spinal segments. Whole spine change score ICC was 0.77 and 0.32-0.75 for spinal segments. Whole-spine SDC was 14.4. Score distribution pattern per VU was similar between readers. Conclusions Using the CTSS, new bone formation in the spine of patients with AS can be assessed reliably. Most progression was seen in the thoracic spine.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 377
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, RAD PROT 99 GUID MED, V14
[2]   Deciding on progression of joint damage in paired films of individual patients: smallest detectable difference or change [J].
Bruynesteyn, K ;
Boers, M ;
Kostense, P ;
van der Linden, S ;
van der Heijde, D .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2005, 64 (02) :179-182
[3]   Assessment of outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: an extended radiographic scoring system [J].
Creemers, MCW ;
Franssen, MJAM ;
van't Hof, MA ;
Gribnau, FWJ ;
van de Putte, LBA ;
van Riel, PLCM .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2005, 64 (01) :127-129
[4]  
Dutch government, LON STRAL BRONN EFF
[5]  
Lukas C, 2007, J RHEUMATOL, V34, P862
[6]   Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: A catalog [J].
Mettler, Fred A., Jr. ;
Huda, Walter ;
Yoshizumi, Terry T. ;
Mahesh, Mahadevappa .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (01) :254-263
[7]   Scoring radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis: should we use the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) or the Radiographic Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (RASSS)? [J].
Ramiro, Sofia ;
van Tubergen, Astrid ;
Stolwijk, Carmen ;
Landewe, Robert ;
van de Bosch, Filip ;
Dougados, Maxime ;
van der Heijde, Desiree .
ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2013, 15 (01)
[8]  
Spoorenberg A, 2004, J RHEUMATOL, V31, P125
[9]   Quantitative measurement of syndesmophyte volume and height in ankylosing spondylitis using CT [J].
Tan, Sovira ;
Yao, Jianhua ;
Flynn, John A. ;
Yao, Lawrence ;
Ward, Michael M. .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2014, 73 (03) :544-550
[10]   Improved precision of syndesmophyte measurement for the evaluation of ankylosing spondylitis using CT: a phantom and patient study [J].
Tan, Sovira ;
Yao, Jianhua ;
Yao, Lawrence ;
Ward, Michael M. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (14) :4683-4704